State Department, Once Again, Asks Wikileaks To 'Return' Leaked Cables
from the that's-not-how-digital-works dept
Earlier this year, we all had a good laugh over the demand from the Pentagon that Wikileaks "return" the leaked documents it held. Lots of people pointed out that they were digital copies. You don't "return" stuff that's digital. All this demand did was make the Pentagon look totally clueless about how digital information works. It looks like the PR geniuses at the State Department have decided to do the same thing. They've put out a demand that Wikileaks "return" the remaining diplomatic cables in its possession.Once again, this just makes the State Department look clueless, out of date and confused about the internet. First of all, you don't "return" digital documents. But, more importantly, Wikileaks has already shown that it has no intention of doing any such thing -- and making such a request just looks silly by the State Department. It's foot stamping rather than doing anything productive. Given the State Department's ridiculous PR over this whole Wikileaks thing, is it really any wonder why those old attempts by the US government to hire PR people to convince the people we were invading that it was for their own good turned out so disastrously bad?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: digital, documents, state department, wikileaks
Companies: wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Of course, there probably is something in that demand that says something about destroying any other copies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Physical thinking
The same sort of thinking can be seen on the attempts by copyright owners to find a way - any way - to make digital data behave as if it were physical objects, being moved instead of copied.
They do not seem to be able to comprehend that, on the digital world, copying is the natural action, unlike on the physical world, where moving is the natural action.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Impossible
Maybe they should print the lot out onto paper, pack it into cardboard boxes, and post it to the state department.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That might be crazy enough to work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
at risk?
Well, who ARE these people? If they really are "at risk" what are you doing to "protect" them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Under normal circumstances, you would be able to retrieve your copy of the cables from Wikileaks.com. However, due to circumstances beyond our control (ie political pressure being exerted by parts of the US Government) our site is experiencing technical difficulties.
Sorry for any inconvenience, but your request cannot be processed at this time. Go DIAF.
Sincerely,
Wikileaks
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Probably a legal loophole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Please accept this spider as payment ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: at risk?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What if...
Also, they may be asking for legal reasons... later on, they can use their apparently unwillingness of "Wikileaks" to return 'stolen' goods, or something to that effect. I dunno, just brainstorming here
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
How hard is that to understand?
It plays into the US government's hand here too. The demand for the return of the documents, no matter how much you don't like the term, sets up the basis for legal action.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I wonder if the Guys at DynCorp are going to be arrested for rape and molestation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is it a point of law?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DMCA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not Suprised
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Back the the Future (Or Shades of Dr. Strangelove)
Christ; even the motionless media "cassettes" in Star Trek were larger than our microSD forms we have today, but at least they were on the right track only a few years after Dr. Strangelove.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: at risk?
representative democracy is just oligarchy where those on top found a better way to solve questions of who should be in charge at any one time than assasinating each other.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not Suprised
"If I delete it on my blackberry. Will the person I sent it to still be able to see it?"
"But if I copy a disk, I have two disks. What do you mean? If I copy a file I only need one hard drive, thats amazing"
Analog -vs- Digital some people haven't gotten out of the "This Is Physical Stuff" mentality.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seriously?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: at risk?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Probably a legal loophole
So, if its a crime to "possess or transmit" said docs, how many people could get screwed here? If they only go after Assange is that selective prosecution?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sorry, that bugs me for some reason.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Yes Sir, the Internet IS a series of tubes.... lol"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
So ..."They've put out a demand that Wikileaks "return" the remaining diplomatic cables in its possession".....
Just pointing out that this is merely a legal formality to set up a case against Assange. They have put it in writing that they think this information could harm or injure the US and they have asked for it back. That is in preparation for a case. Wikileaks actually "returning" the cables is impossible and I am sure the government knows it.
This letter serves not only as the basis for a case against Assange, but also a warning. Read between the lines.... What the government is really saying is "Don't release anymore cables, asshole".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I stole the files back for them
* stole in the MAFIAA sense of the word.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What it really does is show the world how corrupt they are and will stop at nothing even in the face of the absurd or impossible.
It removes any doubt that whatever happens it is happening not because of justice, common sense or whatever it is happening because someone is angry and have the power to do it regardless of what others think.
Those people are spitting in the face of society.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They are asking for the documents back because they themselves don't have a copy (or can't find them). Plus they are too technically inept to scrape them from wikileaks.
They just want to have their own copy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not Suprised
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Probably a legal loophole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lage Raho Wikileaks!
[Analogue Method] Print out several of these leaked cables, package them in envelopes and/or boxes along with flowers and "Get Well Soon"/"Deepest Condolences" cards (roses if the former, daisies if the latter), and send these packages to various State Department addresses.
[Digital Method] Do the ZIP file idea, but also rig the package with a Rick Roll video and make it show the document names (but not the contents) and only play the Rick Roll when the ZIP file is opened.
How does this sound?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Probably a legal loophole
It is truly a shame to see TD and the community that comes with it doing all the things they damn their opponents with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Suprised
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Impossible
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Probably a legal loophole
So, do you want to see the same rush on an unofficial level? Just blindly "stand by your government", right?
And, oh man where are you looking to, that is the US government that reacts here and now first, without even any promise to think later...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I stole the files back for them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The key is the 'remaining'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Suprised
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Please accept this spider as payment ...
Just look at some of the comments on the site you referenced: "I like you am associated with carpet cleaning and it is wonderful to see fellows associated this industry with the same mentalities and thoughts" Yeeeaaa ..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: at risk?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: at risk?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
old bash.org quote....
lol
I download something from Napster
And the same guy I downloaded it from starts downloading it from me when I'm done
I message him and say "What are you doing? I just got that from you"
"getting my song back fucker"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Back the the Future (Or Shades of Dr. Strangelove)
Yes, but today's storage is limited to 16-32GB at best. They never said what the capacity of those cartridges was. For all you know, they could hold 1,000 petabytes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]