DailyDirt: Bring Out Your Dead... With CGI
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
We often talk about big budget movies and how, every day, it's getting cheaper and cheaper to produce quality films. The real revolution may come when special effects don't really seem all that special. CGI is really getting impressive (by that I mean it's hard to know when it's actually being used sometimes) and here are just a few links we've come across on this topic:If you've seen other cool CGI projects, tell us about them in the comments....Hephaestus points out this trend -- around the same time that George Lucas is denying the rumors that he's going to bring back dead actors via "computer trickery" and the purchased rights of deceased movie legend images. Sir Alec Guinness may want to roll over soon. [url] Movie Reshape has demonstrated its cool capabilities at Siggraph. And I don't think I'll ever look at BayWatch in the same way again. [url] Folks that make quartz countertops would not be my first guess for a sponsor putting CGI fruits in their commercial. Incidentally, this video clip looks a lot more realistic if you've ever shattered a banana with liquid nitrogen. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cgi, george lucas, siggraph
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Pretty dark...
Nice find... Yogi Bear just shouldn't go out like that. not like that. He's supposed to be smarter than the average bear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
3rd & 7th
stunning stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
LoL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Obligitory Blender works
However, the results of these and the improvements from one to the other, is impressive.
Giving these tools to the world for free will definitely help work to push down the cost of CGI even further and further.
Blender's website: http://www.blender.org/
In order of creation:
http://www.elephantsdream.org/
http://www.bigbuckbunny.org/
http://www.sintel.org/
I might be missing some, if so: sorry ahead of time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Obligitory Blender works
Quite interesting because a lot of the film is CGI (in a lot of the scenes within the spaceships, only the actors and a few props near them are not CGI). Be sure to read the parts of the website mentioning how they did it:
http://www.starwreck.com/tech.php
http://www.starwreck.com/tech_post.php
http://www.starwre ck.com/faq.php
[ link to this | view in thread ]
While the creepiness factor, for true life CGI people will remain for a short while, eventually it will be solved. Allowing for MaxHeadroom (bad example but the only one I could think of) style characters to be dropped and dragged into any video.
This will lead to everyone being a producer. Like today where everyone is a photographer. With much the same results, producers like photographers will become a dime a dozen. Actors will be replaceable with virtual characters, making the high salaries some actors make obsolete. With lower production costs, tons of competition (almost every single person on earth), TV shows going to singles and not containers-networks, and free distribution. It doesn't bode well for the TV networks.
Being a monopoly they are not ready to compete in a free market ... sucks for them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]