Judge In Limewire Case Wants To Explore How Much File Sharing Really Costs Record Labels
from the this-could-be-interesting... dept
With Limewire officially shutting down following its (totally expected) legal loss earlier this year, you might have though the case was totally over. However, the record labels quickly claimed that with the loss, Limewire should have to pay a billion dollars, which seemed a bit extreme. In typical RIAA fashion, the labels didn't feel like they should have to prove any damages at all, but that the judge should just order statutory rates. However, Limewire asked the judge to have the record labels actually prove their losses -- and, somewhat stunningly -- it appears the judge has agreed, despite the record labels' claim that trying to prove damages would represent a "crushing burden":On Tuesday, Judge Freeman said tough noogies, with some interesting language written in the margins of a court-endorsed memo to the parties. She scribbled -- barely legible -- that Lime Wire should enjoy enough discovery to mount a defense on the damages issue. Both Lime Wire and the labels must pick 100 works -- 80 songs and 20 albums -- that each believes to be representative of the damage (real or not) that file-sharing has on the record companies. In addition, 100 more works -- another 80 songs and 20 albums -- will be selected at random.It's not entirely clear, from there, how each side will go about showing damages, but it is interesting that the plan seems to be to look for empirical evidence to determine actual damages. I'm really surprised by this -- since my understanding was that with statutory rates, the whole idea was that the copyright holder never had to bother proving any actual damage (something I disagree with -- but it's what I thought the law said...). Either way, it certainly would be nice if there were some reasonable data to work with, so this should be worth following.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, damages, file sharing, statutory rates
Companies: limewire, riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1 song @ $1 x 1 billeeon pirates = 1 Billeeeonon per song!
'Proof of losses has been duly noted and requested damages increased accordingly'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wouldn't it be nice if ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Unless they can somehow prove that when I buy a pizza from Pizza Hut then Domino's should have the right to sue me for 'lost profits' or some such bullshit.
On a separate note, LimeWire should've used the Chewbacca defense...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Which is true. The last thing the Recording Industry wants to show is any of their $$ figures, especially for 80-100 works. Imagine if the judge sees how much they've been screwing people over?
I expect this case to be dropped pronto now. Oh wait, it's already reached a judgment...does that mean they can't drop this?
I eagerly await the fallout.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Backfire
PS- Can we please have a TD mobile site? Pleeeease?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Backfire
http://www.techdirt.com/index_lite.php
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Backfire
Can we get mobile browsers to redirect to it automagically?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Backfire
Can I please have a pony?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I am wondering because judges seem to have smartened up on copyright related issues recently.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Backfire
No!! But if you want I have a slightly used camel with a broken back ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
Are all the straws that killed it still usable?
...I'm on a girl.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Backfire
Holy hell, I'm needy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
....See what you've done Mike? You give us good news, and we get all giddy. Bad Mike. Bad news from now on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
Yes they are. They are yours for the taking. I am sure the recording industry will create more than enough straws to kill my new Camel.
"...I'm on a girl."
The whole "I'm on a horse" thing seems kind of distrubing now ;)
I'm not scottish, but, I'm on a sheep ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Exsessive Burden my ass...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The RIAA and the Record Companies
Mark montgomery NYC, NY boboberg@nyc.rr.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Backfire
A lot of them already do. We don't do it for iPhone/Android because those browsers seem to work pretty well with full pages. For now, maybe bookmark it? And we'll look at other options...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Backfire
A more functional mobile offering is on the list of things to work on, but not an immediate priority right now. We're working on a bunch of new things to launch next year, and then we'll look at other priorities.
One of the issues with the mobile site is that it's a lot of work, and it's not clear that it would impact *that* many people. It is something we'd like to do, but it may take a little while.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Exsessive Burden my ass...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
Sorry about threadjacking, btw. I'm done now. :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
given whats happened so far..
Judge refuses.
RIAA gives a bribe to someone in power.
Government threatens to either sell judge's children as sex slaves in afghanistan, or list them as "unlawful combatants" for an argument they had in the playground and threatens to have them executed).
Judge sides with RIAA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If that happens, you are looking at a process that would make judging losses much easier, and make it easier for the courts to assign a cost to it. It would also potentially make it easier to get lawyers to do the work on percentage, because they have an idea what a guilty outcome will bring.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Statutory damages
There's an unwritten tradition in case law that statutory damages should bear some relationship to actual damages.
So, the RIAA will certainly get statutory damages. But there is a huge range in statutory awards - from $750 to $30,000 per infringement. (Assuming it's not "willful," which I don't think was proven.)
I'm guessing that since the RIAA can't come up with any actual numbers, they'll get a much lower award, probably less than five grand per song.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Any number that is determined will be magnitudes smaller than the $600k or $1.9mil that have been handed out.
Right now all of their legal bluster is BECAUSE they can hand out multimillion dollar lawsuits for minor infringement. The numbers can only get smaller from there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I have my reservations about this lawsuit. It seems like they are making this company pay for the illegal activities of other people. It's like having my brother convicted of murder when my sister is the one that did it. True, they are the gateway that these people used to commit the crimes, but does that mean they should be held responsible???
Google wasn't when Viacom sued them for other people posting their content on Youtube.
So why should Limewire be considered guilty? What's your take?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The RIAA and MPAA are notorious for "creative accounting", heck the MPAA even shutdown an initiative to trade stocks on movies and my guess is because it would require an amount of scrutiny on their accounting books that they don't want to have, it would mean they would have to be honest and pay more taxes and who would like that?
If they are loosing billions I want to see how much taxes do they pay, I want to see the books. Basically I want proof and so should the government because I don't think they are being entirely honest here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
If they'd have just said, "We're a gnutella and torrent tracking service, and the only interaction we have ourselves is to remove dead links reported to us...", I'd see them as having a similar case to what Google has with YouTube. They didn't do that though. Same reason I don't feel sorry for TBP. They flaunted it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The judge must be from STL
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The Avast story is a great example, with a single pirated serial number being used almost 775,000 times to install their software illegally. From a single share (the person with the license) comes 35 million dollars worth of illegally installed software.
There is no minor infringements on torrents. Once you put it out there, it is out there pretty much forever and never goes away. You may no longer seed the file, but the file you seeded continues to move along. Your single seeded file for a week can end up with millions of people in that time, and millions more after you stop seeding.
It is fairly easy to show how a single file moves, and how many people can end up with it. At even pennies a copy (which is way lower than retail) it still can easily run into the millions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Furthermore, it is impossible using bit torrent technology to tell with any amount of certainty how many people download a file.
In short, you can't *prove* any actual damages at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sharing?
Better yet, how many people do you think would "Share" their music files on Limewire if they couldn't use the file themselves until the person that they shared the file with gave I back?
We were at a property recently where our company offers free Wi Fi & has been having problems with people using it to share music and our regional manager was expressing her displeasure with the fact that people were sharing stolen music that put us at risk and someone asked her where she got her music, to which, she replied:
"I get all of my music from LIMEWIRE!"
Now that is what I call sharing!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Backfire
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sharing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
good idea: at least shows if any damages did occur
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sharing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Right, it's a great example of a company pulling a number out of thin air using it as advertizing for their goal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sharing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Wouldn't it be nice if ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
proof of loss
I doubt whether the record companies want to reveal any of this information to Limewire. Even though the judgment has already been delivered, the parties could agree on a settlement. The RIAA could announce that they can't prove damages and the case would be over. The only question is, how much will Limewire charge to let that happen?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NEVER BUY MUSIC
I'm not just a listener, but I'm also an artist and this is a slap in the face to everyone. It's bad enough that Limewire is shutting down, but they want a BILLION DOLLARS?
As in the words of Trent Reznor: "Steal it... Steal away and steal some more. Steal it and then give to your friends. Keep on stealing"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
im big fan of limewire
[ link to this | view in thread ]