DailyDirt: Healthier Rice... From Science
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Billions of people around the world eat rice. So if rice can be made to be more healthy, the benefits could be globally significant. Sure, there are plenty of folks trying to genetically engineer better rice (eg. Golden Rice), but if you don't like GMOs for whatever reason, you're not out of luck. There are a few things that might help improve rice without messing around with rice DNA.- Cooking low calorie rice can be accomplished by adding coconut oil to the water used to cook rice. The coconut oil prevents some of the resistant starches in rice from becoming digestible starches, thereby reducing the calories available to whoever eats it. [url]
- Arsenic content in rice can be reduced by relatively simple rinsing and cooking techniques. A coffee-pot percolation method for cooking rice could eliminate more than half of the arsenic in contaminated rice. [url]
- Studying the microbiome of rice could help reduce the arsenic levels in the grain and plant. Bacteria in the soil has been found to lessen the uptake of arsenic significantly -- potentially increasing food production productivity and improving food safety and chronic health conditions for the people who eat this staple daily. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: arsenic, bacteria, cooking, food, gmo, golden rice, health, how-to, low calorie, microbiome, rice, starches
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is there really a thing about GMOs being actually unhealthy?
So far I haven't found any case for all GMOs being labeled as unhealthy, given we're happy to eat crush beetle carapace and artificial sweeteners that are allegedly safe but give people headaches, without big warning labels on either of those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is there really a thing about GMOs being actually unhealthy?
If I was worried about food safety, I would have eaten that burrito today from a street vendor with prison tattoos.
There are a lot of reasons, political, economic, and simple consumer preference to not want to purchase GMO foods. And one might be simple contrariness. When an industry is willing to spend billions to make sure you never find out how their products are made, consumers can tell those companies to go to hell.
Because ultimately, the consumer is paying the bill for all the research, all the marketing and all the lobbying around GMOs. And the one who pays gets to decide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Let's all agree to hate on Monsanto for their massive IP abuses instead of for GMO silliness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The one who pays the bill gets to find out what they're paying for. And the unwillingness to disclose the provenance of their products is what's giving the GMO industry a bad name.
One wonders why they don't just take all the money that they use to lobby congress and fight labeling laws and just use it on marketing their products' supposed wonderful properties. When you hide something, it makes people suspicious, and make no mistake: consumers are suspicious about GMOs and have a right to be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kinda what I gathered before.
From what I've read here, Monsanto is a really big fact dick and should be boycotted if not burned down and turned into a community garden.
From what I've heard about labeling, it is very lacking in details. The bug carapace is from natural red food coloring which renders many things non-kosher, which is why it's a big deal, which is why I know about ground bug carapaces as a food product in the first place.
No one puts powdered beetle carapace on their ingredients list. They put natural food coloring.
And I think putting a GMO warning on our labels is going to be much like putting natural food coloring. Uninformative and not useful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Kinda what I gathered before.
I don't want to eat patented basic foodstuffs. If every goddamn patent is listed when I buy a phone or a video game, why shouldn't every goddamn patent be listed when I buy food?
As you say, the food industry tries very hard to hide what's really in their products (like bug carapaces). If I'm the one paying, I want to know little details like that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why reduce calories?
What a stunning disconnect to go from feeding people to tips on how to get less food value from your food.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]