Latest Google Spam Technique: Invent Fake Street Addresses And Show Up In Google Listings
from the spam-spam-spam-spam dept
John Nagle, who famously highlighted the massive problems with Craigslist spam a few years ago, alerts us to his latest report, showing how Google's regular listings are getting filled up with Google Places spam (pdf). Apparently, Google integrated its Places offering into Google's regular search back at the end of October, and almost immediately various search engine optimizers (both the "white hats" and the "black hats") almost immediately realized that it was really easy to game the system: you just create a "business" at a fake, but real-sounding, address. Some companies are quite upfront about how to do this:- Set up a listing in Google Maps at an address that does not currently exist. For example, where there is a 60 Main St., Anytown and a 64 Main St, Anytown and these represent real addresses. Set up your listing at 62 Main St.
- Name your business USKeyword-City, or Keyword-Pro-city or Fictitious name of person plus keyword for the personal touch.
- Build citations to your listing. These listings contain citations from Yahoo Local, Hotfrog, Guidespot, local.newstimelive.com.
- Create a blog on one of the sites for the purpose of creating a perfect citation for thousands of listings.
- Link build
- Give your new listing a sparkling review
- Now find an adjacent town and repeat. Again and again and again again
Apparently, the more aggressive, less ethical "black hat" SEOs are seeking to take this to a new level, with new software on the way that will make it easier to bypass various attempts by Google to control this and, at the same time, use spamming engines to write fake "reviews" for these spammed "businesses."
As the report notes, there are two key areas of weakness in the way Google has implemented this:
The two phases of spamming Google Places are the insertion of fake business locations and the creation of fake reviews. Both are embarrassingly easy using the techniques described above.Considering how much work has been done by SEO folks in just a few months, it will be interesting to see how Google responds. The company has always promoted its "anti-spam" efforts, but it sounds like not much forethought was put into the Places integration.
Google Places obtains business locations from web pages created by the business itself, advertising directories ("Yellow Pages") entries paid for by the business, and from "place pages", also created by the business itself. There is little if any verification against objective data sources, such as business licenses, corporation registrations, and business credit rating services such as Dun and Bradstreet. This makes it possible to create fake Google Places entries.
Recommendations are obtained from recommendation web sites. Most recommendation sites allow free account creation and have little information about their members, so the cost of creating phony identities for recommendation spam is low. Because the typical local business has a relatively small number of recommendations, only a few phony recommendations are needed to promote an individual business location.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: google places, spam
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
link
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Windfall
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Windfall
LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matter of Time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
huh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Verification options
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Verification options
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google Nashville Harley Davidson
The one that comes up as "B" Nashville Harley Davidson on Arcade St does not exist. It provides an out of town phone number and a website that is garbage, and probably chock full of scripts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
SEO influences Google Places
Other than the occasional Google Places forum comment, support for existing problems is nonexistent.
The information given above by John Nagle would have been accurate a few weeks back, however position hierarchy for business websites in Google Places is now (subject to change again at anytime) largely dependent upon the site's SEO.
The format of the SERPS also differs dependent upon your browser, your web history, your IP location, keyword searched, etc. For the most part, Google Places has been merged with the organic results.
After this last algo change I'm referring to, many of our clients, who had excellent organic rankings with poor Google Places positions, suddenly saw their profiles moved into Google Places. The common denominator I've observed for this is the SEO factor.
John Barremore
Houston, TX
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
white hat?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google has changed the verification process
I'd like to add that Google is also partly to blame for this spamming. It's frustrating that they place so much weight on proximity to center point which should have zero relevance for service businesses that come to you, and less relevance for others. Their proximity policy pushes many white-hat SEOs over to the dark side out of frustration.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So much of this its gonna end
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]