New Congressional Leadership Talks Up Transparency... While Planning To Attack Wikileaks
from the say-what-now? dept
We had just noted that the new Republican leadership in Congress had decided that investigating Wikileaks is a priority, as they're upset that Attorney General Eric Holder has been "too slow" to bring legal action against the site (perhaps because it's not clear any laws were broken...). So it seems rather ironic that at the very same time, the same Republican leadership is also claiming to support much greater transparency in Congress. Apparently they're going to do a lot more to use technology to show the public what's going on in Congress. This will apparently mean that audio and video recordings of committee meetings will be permanently posted, "in a manner that is easily accessible to the public," and all votes in those committees will now be disclosed. On top of that, all legislation will supposedly be posted in full online three days before a vote. Of course, the Obama administration promised something similar, which it promptly ignored upon taking office. Also they're doing some more gimmicky things like streaming a Congressional session live on Facebook. I think that bringing more transparency to Congress is a good idea -- and I at least applaud the sentiment, but it seems rather silly to be doing that at the very same time as attacking Wikileaks, which was a clear reaction to the lack of transparency in government.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: congress, transparency, wikileaks
Companies: wikileaks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Transparency in general, not just for a special branch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The Executive branch's many many offices and departments are where most of the harmful secrecy is practiced. All your 3 letter agencies are the executive branch as is the state department. These are the organizations we most desperately need to have more transparency in. (Coincidentally those are the organizations that Mr Transparency Promising But Not Delivering Obama has the most direct power over)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Further, you have to wonder if this would be any real transparency, or just a bunch of elected officials trying to play to the masses and "ride a wave of discontent" until it dies down.
In this case A does not preclude B. Sorry TD, fail!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Exactly what do you think Wikileaks did wrong?
Specifically name a single law or statute that was broken or violated.
I'm waiting...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Actually, with the republicans blocking Obamanomics the housing market is going to fail in about 12-18 months. With no more free ride at the fed. That mean a second round of people loosing their houses and jobs. This will continue until the housing prices fall 10-25% below the inflation line. Then a recovery can occur. The possibility of greater "discontent" is at the 60%+ level. So AC you fail it won't die down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Discontent only as applied to Wikileaks and transparency. I didn't speculate how the Republicans are going to perform a low tech hanging of the black man in the white house.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Secrecy is to easy nowadays, Wikileaks is the thing that brings back some resemblance of balance to the equation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
No answer has been forthcoming.
>>>Ad hominem sneering does not make your argument.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We'll see...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Grandstanding
...wait, isn't that just a "goddamn piece of paper"?
http://www.infowars.net/articles/december2005/121205neocons.htm
Rest assured friends, all this bluster will blow over and they'll get right back to trampling the constitution that they are so eager to throw in our face this week.
CBMHB
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Grandstanding
As an aside, I actually hate both sides of the aisle equally - just so everyone understands I'm not sticking up for the Reps or Dems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm going to try to put this eloquently as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm going to try to put this eloquently as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm going to try to put this eloquently as possible.
But most people would call you crazy.
You crazy little fucker, STFU.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I'm going to try to put this eloquently as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I'm going to try to put this eloquently as possible.
It rubs both ways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-demands-twitter-release-assange-de tails-2179740.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]