DailyDirt: Weapons Of Some Destruction

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

Wed, Apr 13th 2011 5:00pm — Michael Ho

Projectile weapons are so old school. There are so many other kinds of weapons to choose from nowadays. Some are non-lethal, but others are just as lethal -- even though they only send out electromagnetic waves. Here are some examples of new weapons under development that could cause some damage (temporary or permanent).

Set your flashlight to "stun" your enemies -- there's a stun ray gun that incapacitates with a really really bright light. It's not even a laser, but it causes "the inverse of blindness" -- disorienting a person from 200 feet away. Just hope that your attackers aren't wearing sunglasses..? [url]
A green laser can be used to temporarily blind pirates on the open water. Sunglasses won't stop these lasers, but maybe more pirates will start wearing an eye patch to save one eye from this laser-induced blindness. [url]
The US Navy is testing a new high energy laser that can destroy small boats at sea. Now they just need to put these lasers on sharks... [url]
Apparently, a cyber-army could be built with just $100 million in 2 years. But an experienced spammer could probably take down that cyber army with a fraction of those resources. [url]
To discover more interesting war-related stuff, check out what's currently floating around the StumbleUpon universe. [url]

By the way, StumbleUpon can recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: cyber-army, lasers, navy, stun ray

5 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 13 Apr 2011 @ 5:57pm

Speaking Of Eyepatches ...
... is it true that B52 bomber pilots do, or used to, fly with an eyepatch over one eye?

So if the working eye gets blinded in a nuclear blast, they can just switch the eyepatch and keep on flying.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Angry Puppy (profile), 13 Apr 2011 @ 7:34pm

Re: Speaking Of Eyepatches ...
Possibly at one point, but strategic bombers have blackout curtains/shutters and pilots fly on instruments only until clear of probable target areas. An eye patch is not thick enough and may slip out of place and even the loss of sight in one eye is not desirable.

I want a fricken mutant shark with a fricken laser mounted on its head!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Michael Ho (profile), 13 Apr 2011 @ 11:59pm

Re: Speaking Of Eyepatches ...
hmm. not sure about bomber pilots wearing eyepatches... but I'd think bombs are mostly dropped by drones now, so no eyepatches necessary for drone pilots.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 14 Apr 2011 @ 9:29am

I don't know about bombers, but I heard that pirate used to wear them to preserve their night vision between upper and lower decks on the ship.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bdhoro (profile), 15 Apr 2011 @ 3:19pm

Point of the eye patch
Yeah thats what I thought too, they kept one eye in the dark at all times to have an advantage below the deck. I really need to test that out one day.
[ link to this | view in thread ]