DailyDirt: Planning For A Mars Colony
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
The Martian is inspiring some re-vitalized enthusiasm for manned missions to Mars. Along with the discovery of liquid water flowing on the surface of the red planet, science fiction combined with actual science is making space exploration sound cool again. However, there are still plenty of harsh realities for manned space exploration. Men have walked (and driven) on the moon, but beyond that, it's unclear how much anyone really benefits from having people touch the surface of another moon or planet -- without a plan to stay there and accomplish even more significant tasks. Becoming an interplanetary species sounds like a nice idea, but it's not a pressing issue to actually do it -- and we probably won't be ready for it until we can actually set long term goals (ahem, and pass budgets on time).- NASA has thought through the steps that could take people to Mars -- and published its plan to try to give it a boost in Congress. The report gives a brief overview of how NASA plans to move from space stations that need to be constantly re-supplied to "Earth independent" stations that wouldn't require a consistent supply line from terrestrial resources. [url]
- There's a socio-economic argument that Martian "cities" are unlikely to exist simply because Mars is so remote and isolated, and cities require a network of trade and commerce. Essentially, there is a vast amount of infrastructure and resources to build up on Mars before it's anything more than a scientific curiosity outpost. No unobtainium exists to make Mars a worthwhile location for anything (yet?). [url]
- Mars simulations have been performed on isolated camps, and NASA is also working with Navy submarine training facilities to get a better idea of how to deal with living in sealed environments for long periods of time. NASA wants to avoid situations that some reality TV shows (eg. Big Brother and Real World) encourage. (Even Mars One isn't going to do a reality show anymore.) [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: interplanetary travel, manned missions, mars, mars colony, mars simulation, martian cities, navy, space exploration, submarine
Companies: mars one, nasa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I plan on retiring on Mars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I plan on retiring on Mars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I plan on retiring on Mars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I plan on retiring on Mars
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting. I thought it might instill some skepticism about one's odds of survival.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
However, that does not mean it would be a cake walk for humans. So many things that could, and eventually would, go bad. Why did they not have a backup comm system? Manned missions usually have backup for the backup.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]