Techno-Panic Reporting: The Media Deserves No Mercy
from the laughing-at-not-with dept
I've always felt that the maxim "history repeats" is a little oversimplified. There are countless patterns and cycles in history, but they are simply elements of a whole that is always changing. When history repeats, it's rarely identical.
That might be what makes the techno-panic mentality so astonishing: it's one of the few examples where nothing seems to change. Today's anti-videogame rhetoric is no different from the objections raised to telephones, movie theatres and chess. A 1972 documentary on Future Shock is almost indistinguishable from Sherry Turke's latest book.
Now, people can believe what they want about technology, misguided as their views might be. But in one group, it is unforgivable: the news media. It's tough to find any large news organizations that don't turn technology into the star villain of every story in which it is even tangentially related--and they aren't afraid to misrepresent the facts to do so. This highlights several broad cultural problems that plague modern journalism: lazy reporting, pandering to viewers instead of educating them, and an internal techno-panic attitude among journalists and publishers who are failing to adapt to a changing marketplace.
All that brings me around to one of my favorite websites, Cracked.com. I wrote about them not long ago, but boy have they been hitting the nail on the head a lot recently. They just took on some examples of the media exaggerating or flat-out inventing techno-panic stories, and their ruthless analysis is both spot-on and hilarious (and a tad profane). Some highlights:
On some trash-texting between rival football players that made the news rounds in Austin:
In real life, if some high school dudes yell, "I'm gonna tear you limb from fucking limb" across a football field, the ref probably wouldn't throw a flag. Hell, the ref probably wouldn't hear it over all the grown-ups in the stands yelling equally violent threats at the opposing players. That kind of thing is said verbally, from one high school male to another, while in striking distance, on a weekly basis. But take those exact same words and transmit them electronically via a new technology, and it's a goddamned crisis.
We could also write that one off as a slow news day, but two months later, they ran a fucking follow-up report. Why? Because "cyberbullying" is everywhere! "Hide your children, lest the demonic spirit of cyberbullying ingest their innocent, untarnished souls! What is it about these new devil devices that makes our teenage boys act... exactly the way they did before?"
On a Telegraph article titled War Games Fanatic Matthew Pyke Killed by Gamer from Germany:
If you Google his name, you'll find dozens upon dozens of news websites proclaiming that this was a gamer feud gone wrong. A violent game, to boot! He was a "war games" fanatic! Something must be done!
Oh, hey, look at this. It turned out that the killer was obsessed with Pyke's girlfriend. But because the three met on Pyke's gaming forum, every goddamn headline about the case was, "GAMING GAMER KILLS GAMER FROM GAMING GAMELAND GAME GAME!"
On a dispute that ended in murder and, according to the headlines, started on Twitter (but in fact started in person):
Twitter is not simply a means by which people communicate, the same as they would at a bar or by postcards. No, it's new and scary and must have some alien ability to influence men's minds to make them do what they otherwise would not. Right?
Do I even need to point out that if I call your house and tell you you're a worthless cocksucker and threaten your life, that I'm the asshole here? Not my fucking phone?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, moral panics, reporting, techno panics
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No mercy
And War Games was a great movie.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No mercy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: No mercy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this a Techdirt record?
"GAMING GAMER KILLS GAMER FROM GAMING GAMELAND GAME GAME!"
And I particularly like that one. Having said all that, you should hear what's going around the sporting newsbands after the whole Jay Cutler injured/not-injured curfluffle, with active and retired players tweeting in support or disdain of him, and the effects of those social media expressions on the overall labor negotiations between owners and players.
Pretty interesting that Twitter might save football by showing a divided players union....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is this a Techdirt record?
Hehe yeah I added the "tad profane" warning for that exact reason
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It drives me crazy watching the lazy coverage
The majority of the news nowadays just seems to pander to the lowest common denominator, which means at best it's mediocre and at it's worst it's just the mouthpiece for whatever organization sent them the "hot tip" of the day. Then they just parrot the talking points without actually looking into any of it. Lazy reporting and a lack of integrity is whats killing the "big" news media IMHO, and the whole head in the sand about how the market is changing.. but that's like beating a dead horse on this site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
On one hand we have news organizations inflating stories or even creating them out of whole cloth. On the other, we have a reasonable and restrained information/opinion service (techdirt) that highlights the real and often glaring flaws in many systems.
A news organization printing "Teen Shoots Self Due To Video Game" because the unfortunate young person happened to be in a house that held a game console is bad "journalism"
techdirt highlighting the "innovation tax" created by patent thickets or some new lawsuit based on a broad patent that claims to cover all forms of pressing buttons on a keyboard(for example) is simply unfortunate truth.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Close to home...
I was on those Abvance Wars forums when Pyke was murdered...
It was surreal to hear about it. And the news media, being the lazy dicks they are, took a few quotes from the forums and did NO investigative work. Suffice to say, I think the media can't ever get it right. I'll talk more later...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is why humans don't live forever.
Fortunately the world moves on and the younger folk can thank our gods for limited lifespans ... until it's THEIR turn.
I'm 44.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
*Takes a Wii controller and pantomimes using it like a grenade and tosses it at MissingFrame*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
Do you want me to scare the shit out of you? I will tell you what is coming over the next couple year technology wise. At your age its 50 / 50 you will have a heart attack.
PS I am older than you and don't have a problem with it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
So imagine what will happen when the latest, greatest technology is something that makes it so they do
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
Telomere extension, nanotech implants that generate stem cells and repair damage, etc. Fun times be coming soon to a pharmacist or doctors office near you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
Question for you. Overpopulation and all, what do you think is going to happen to all the LCD and "lawyer" :) types when this happens?
David
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
Fortunately, Hephaestus, I've avoided many of the nasty statistics by keeping a healthy lifestyle. In that 50/50, what percentage are smokers who don't exercise ...
BTW, informal survey, to test my generalizations: How many people over 50 do you know that text-message daily?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
I understand you worse now. What a confusing comment.
?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: This is why humans don't live forever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really low tech example
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
this is why we love tech dirt
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
History repeats in different ways
Yes. Hegel's oversimplification was noted by Karl Marx, who pointed out the difference between repetitions:
Hegel remarks somewhere that all facts and personages of great importance in world history occur, as it were, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as a tragedy, the second time as farce.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]