TSA Starts Testing New Scanners That Don't Show Your Naked Body
from the well,-that's-a-start dept
Despite all the protests from the TSA that there was nothing (nothing!) wrong with requiring everyone to display their naked body or be groped by TSA employees in order to board an airplane, it appears that even TSA officials are recognizing that the nudie scanners may have gone a bit too far. The TSA is now testing new screening machines that display a generic body outline, rather than showing a person's actual body. Of course, there's no word on if the TSA will similarly mislead the public about the safety (or lack of safety) in these new machines. Also, there's no indication if these new machines will be as easily defeated as the old ones.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
New scanners?
While eliminating body images will likely address the concerns of privacy and civil liberties groups, some critics still worry that the machines give off unsafe levels of radiation. TSA argues that the radiation levels are not harmful.
Appears to be the same machines with "new" software.
File> Properties> Show boobies.
I would love to see the options of an elevated account.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: New scanners?
You are attempting to use a restricted command
Please enter a valid username/password to enter
Username: system\pervert
Password: ********
__________________________________________
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The system does not involve new machines. Instead, it relies on new software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The system does not involve new machines. Instead, it relies on new software.
This is what I heard. The hardware is the same, but the scanned 3d model is distorted and applied onto a generic figure.
Safety concerns are still relevant.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The system does not involve new machines. Instead, it relies on new software.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Chertoff, Most Holy
Regardless, this change will clearly protect America from Terror, which is the leading cause of diarrhea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems like an admission that the head of the TSA is a lying sack of shit, doesn't it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Our security services have never lied to us before. Why should they start now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$$$
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just more TSA lies and misdirection
The machines are the _same_. _Same_ privacy invading tech, _same_ potential health concerns, _same_ waste of tax dollars with this ineffectual system.
The new software purportedly 'displays' the results on a generic outline. It still _records_ and _stores_ (remember when the TSA was/is telling everyone that none of the images are capable of being stored?) the original image in all it's privacy invading glory.
Oh, and just to add insult to injury, the TSA is requiring new scanners to not only have large storage capacity, but high speed network links.
Now, if the scanners just display images draped a generic outline (you can dump most of the image right there) and they _never_ store any images, just what would large hard drives and fast network links be used for? It couldn't possibly be for storing large detailed privacy invading images of people and quickly transferring them to 'somewhere safe' (from subpoena and embarrassing, to the TSA at least, disclosures) now could it?
I mean this is the TSA, they would _never_ lie to the public, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]