Rapper Sues ESPN, Amazon, And1 For Promoting His Song Like Crazy
from the how-dare-you... dept
Eric Goldman was kind enough to send over this somewhat odd lawsuit by the rapper Michael "Dutch" Jackson, filed against And1, ESPN, Amazon and others. The lawsuit is a little confusing and odd on many levels, but let's see if we can get through the basics. Jackson apparently wrote a hiphop song called "I Am The Greatest," which he claims he had not published or released. Somehow (and it does not appear to be explained how), shoe maker And1 got ahold of this unpublished unreleased song and (according to Jackson) put it on one of a series of mixtapes it was releasing as part of a marketing ploy to sell shoes. Apparently, even though the mixtapes were widely released for download and copying, Amazon also sold the mixtapes. ESPN's involvement is not at all clearly spelled out. Basically, it says that ESPN "associated itself" with And1's mixtapes, but does not say how:As a result, the ESPN Defendants recognized that by associating their various products and services with the hip hop, rap and R7B musical genres and with And1 and the Marketing Plan, the ESPN Defendants would also receive increased good will and brand name recognition among the Urban Oriented Consumer demographic, would receive increased website traffic to their websites, and would enjoy increased marketing, sale and distribution of the various products and services sold by ESPN Defendants, including those involving the game of basketball, to such Consumers.This seems like guilt by association, even though the details of that association are never actually made clear.
The ESPN Defendants thus intentionally set out to associate themselves with the Mixtapes distributed by And1 and the ripple effect copies, described above, that it also knew would be produced, distributed and shared by others, and to profit therefrom.
As for Amazon, anyone can set up a store and sell stuff. It doesn't automatically make Amazon guilty of infringement. There's no indication that any sort of DMCA notice was sent to Amazon concerning these mixtapes either.
More oddities: apparently Jackson wrote the song in November 2006, but did not release it. And1 is accused of including the song in a mixtape in 2008. Yet... Jackson didn't actually get around to getting a registered copyright on the song until May 10th of 2010. That, of course, would limit whatever damages he might be able to get (perhaps significantly). If it's true that And1 took and used the song without permission, then it sounds like he may have a decent case against that company... but the others seem like a big stretch.
Oh, and just to make the whole thing even more confusing. I just checked out YouTube, and it appears Dutch Jackson has his own YouTube channel... and on that YouTube channel, posted back on September 30th, 2009 is a video of the song -- complete with a ton of clips of Lebron James. You would have to imagine that Jackson does not have permission to make use of those clips. In fact, it didn't take long to notice that at least some of the clips in the video are from ESPN. So, it seems that Jackson was perfectly thrilled that he was getting all this attention and promotion for free in relation to the NBA. And while he was aware of that, he didn't go rush out to get that song registered at the copyright office. Also, if you're going to sue ESPN for infringement, you probably shouldn't put up a video that includes clips from ESPN.
If you step back and look at it, it appears that Jackson and this song got an amazing amount of free promotion from the use of his song in the mixtape. Even if it was "unauthorized," it seems like a massive amount of attention that Jackson could capitalize on to get more attention for himself -- something he appeared to realize himself with that video. In the lawsuit itself, Jackson's lawyers admit that the mixtape went viral. So why not just build off of that, rather than suing a bunch of companies who probably had no idea about the song?
Anyway, I've embedded the video below. I'm guessing it may disappear soon after I do, so I've also got a screenshot of the YouTube page below that, with the video stopped at a point showing an ESPN clip:
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, dutch jackson, i am the greatest, mixtapes, promotions
Companies: amazon, and1, espn
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: go through my catalogue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He's a joke
"And at the end of the day they still used my shit without authorization....so pay up bitches!!!!lol"
dutchjackson1 27 minutes ago
And at the end of the day this guy has next to no talent, and should be kissing the ass of anyone who played his "music" in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He's a joke
Not someone... I did. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: He's a joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: He's a joke
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
* He makes a song
* ESPN, Amazon, And1, etc somehow get a hold of the song a make a profit off it
* The guy makes none of this money, but it's ok because he got 1 minute of fame.
'Fame' isn't going to feed a family, and under no circumstances should it ever be right that other parties are taking 100%+ of all money made and giving not a penny of it back to the performer. I thought mike was against record companies screwing musicians, I didn't think he'd oppose a musician fighting back against this kind of treatment. What will he do with that fame? It will still take even more money to channel that into more production, websites, advertisement campaigns, product sales, etc.; money he may not have (hypothetically).
I think mike just justified the abuse faced by 30 seconds to mars, because hell, they still got famous on the backs of the record company and it's time to pay their debt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 'Fame' isn't going to feed a family,
"And at the end of the day they still used my shit without authorization....so pay up bitches!!!!lol"
But sees not problem with using ESPN's shit to possibly make money.
Hypocrite much?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here I am....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LOL!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]