Prostitutes Have Just Moved From Craigslist To Facebook

from the big-help dept

Wed, Feb 9th 2011 10:02am — Mike Masnick

When Craigslist -- under a peer pressure campaign from grandstanding state attorneys general and some misguided activists groups -- shut down its adult services section, it wasn't difficult to predict that this would do little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution. Instead, it would just drive those activities to other sites, and those sites might not work quite as closely with law enforcement as Craigslist did. In fact, we noted that Craigslist was a very useful tool for law enforcement to actually track down and crack prostitution rings.

Anyway, as expected, it appears that the activity hasn't gone away, it's just moved elsewhere. News.com highlights how it appears that Facebook has become the site of choice for prostitutes, picking up on a small bit of some new research on prostitution by Sudhir Venkatesh. The report suggested that Facebook had already been growing as a tool for prostitutes, but the exodus from Craigslist may have just sped that whole process up a bit.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: grandstanding, prostitution
Companies: craigslist, facebook

94 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Dark Helmet (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 9:52am

YES!
This is going to make Failbook sooooooo much better....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 4:03pm
  
  Re: YES!
  I am going to suggest anyone dating a hooker with 10,000 friends use a condom.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- G Thompson (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 6:34pm
  
  Re: YES!
  You sure they were not talking about Attention Whores instead? Since then umm Facebook would be the place!
  
  Muwahahahahaha
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John batty, 7 Nov 2012 @ 9:20am
  
  Re: Prostitutes
  I have just joined twitter. The first two followers i get are prostitutes askin would i like to be a bit of a friend. Or a date. My wife would go balmy
  
  Thank
  You
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:04am

The question won't be if they are on facebook (prostitutes are people as well) but rather how facebook will handle their solicitations.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:10am
  
  Re:
  Well, first, AGs will whine with no legal basis until Facebook creates a special adult section. Then the AGs will whine with no legal basis until Facebook charges a premium to get access to the adult section. Then the AGs will whine with no legal basis because Facebook is making money off of prostitution!
  
  The adult section will be shut down, the prostitutes will move somewhere else (maybe Twitter is next?), the AGs will get reelected because the electorate is ignorant, and we'll repeat the whole process over again.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Liz, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:11am
    
    Re: Re:
    I guess it's possible to solicit someone with just 140 characters.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Kris B, 9 Feb 2011 @ 1:11pm
      
      RE 140 Characters
      ..or you could use one digit :)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 4:04pm
  
  Re:
  "but rather how facebook will handle their solicitations."
  
  By running ads for them of course ...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kevin (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:16am

Not to offend
All this did was move the "professional" to facebook. Your run of the mill tramp has been available for free on facebook for since it was created.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anothermike, 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:07pm
  
  Re: Not to offend
  I thought LinkedIn was the social network for professionals.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Scott Crawford (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:21am

Or...
...we could just legalize, regulate and tax prostitution like sensible people would, but in the long run, that would give women way too much control over what they do with their bodies, so that'd never fly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jay (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:24am
  
  Re: Or...
  Didn't Ontario Canada have this exact issue come up about 6 months ago?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - btrussell (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 7:51pm
    
    Re: Re: Or...
    Yes.
    
    But it is okay to do so in newspapers, yellow pages, etc...
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- MartinidaGreat, 27 Jul 2011 @ 12:59pm
  
  Re:
  Prostitution is already legal in the UK, it's just frowned upon like it has been for hundreds of years.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Daryl, 9 Feb 2020 @ 4:37am
    
    Re: Re:
    Its not in US though
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
John Doe, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:24am

This will make i tharder to fight
On Craigslist, law enforcement just had to monitor the adult services section in their area to keep tabs on what was going on. Facebook is completely decentralized so it is going to make their job harder.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Eugene (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:58am
  
  Re: This will make i tharder to fight
  Well, honestly we won't know if this will make their job harder or easier. What we DO know is that these zero tolerance policies are going to make it impossible for law enforcement to figure that out either. The second they get a sense of how to handle Facebook-related prostitution, it's going to get grandstanded off the site. Which puts law enforcement right back at square one. That's the real problem.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - John Doe, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:14am
    
    Re: Re: This will make i tharder to fight
    I think the real problem is, they want it to go back underground. You know, out of sight, out of mind. If it is on public websites, they have to acknowledge it and do something about it. So they aren't really worried about prostitution so much as they are worried they will have to do their job. It is much easier and more profitable to be out giving traffic tickets than stopping actual crime.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Eugene (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re: This will make i tharder to fight
      Stats over solutions.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Brian Schroth (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re: This will make i tharder to fight
      Ah yes, two people consensually doing something totally natural that harms no one is "real crime".
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - John Doe, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:29am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: This will make i tharder to fight
        Technically, yes it is a crime. I made no argument about whether it should or should not be a crime.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Eugene (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:45pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: This will make i tharder to fight
        Well, the immoral part is actually in the way the business is set up structurally, rather than the act itself. But god forbid we actually go after pimps. *They* aren't defiling anyone :p
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joe Ew, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:24am

Ew
That puts a whole new spin on "1 million friends", doesn't it?

*Joe Ew Likes This!*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:50am
  
  Re: Ew
  It also enhances the meaning of poke.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Joe Ew, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:27am

Tinfoil hat FIRMLY on
Considering that Facebook is far more interested in tracking its users, and so is lousy with information about them, wouldn't this make catching Johns and the Pros easier?
Maybe this is what Law Enforcement had in mind all along!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:46am
  
  Re: Tinfoil hat FIRMLY on
  Facebook still gives users the options for setting up privacy screens. This is not easier for law enforcement to deal with, but much harder, since craigslist offers no such privacy options. Anyone can see a CL add, but only a friended person would be able to see private solicitations.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Joe Ew, 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:30pm
    
    Re: Re: Tinfoil hat FIRMLY on
    I guess it would also depend on how zealously Facebook will defend the information they have gathered so far for a user behind the screens from LE. Screens or no, I'd imagine they'd have a lot of info on their hands.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nobody, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:39am

Good Luck
I really love how optimistic politicians and the AG's are.

I mean, come on, do you really think you can get rid of something that has been around longer than any religion you may be a part of?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:44am

Oh no! Next they will move back to street corners where the police can't see them at all!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:47am

Do we have any of their Facebook profiles for um...research purposes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:48am

I bet you see a bunch of older guys on facebook now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kevin (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:53am

hmmm.
How long before they turn it into one of the flash based games where I can pay using facebook credits for upgrades and bonuses? Paypal? Direct Billing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 2:38pm
  
  Re: hmmm.
  I would so play "Hookerville"...
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Junior, 9 Feb 2011 @ 10:59am

prostitutes should b tax help pay our taxes not just fines
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btrussell (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 7:55pm
  
  Re:
  They are.
  They can also write off work related expenses, fishnet stockings for example.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sexy blonde, 30 Apr 2011 @ 9:16am
  
  Re:
  just to let you know pro's DO pay taxes. It's a business like any other .Great job in fact bringing pleasure to others
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Daryl, 9 Feb 2020 @ 4:42am
  
  Re: foreal thoe
  Exactly pay us back for all the help we give them
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
average_joe (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:01am

When Craigslist -- under a peer pressure campaign from grandstanding state attorneys general and some misguided activists groups -- shut down its adult services section, it wasn't difficult to predict that this would do little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution.

How do you know for a fact that shutting down the section on Craigslist did "little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution"? What evidence do you have to support this claim?

I'm going to have to say it, Mike: It's faith-based FUD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jay (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:10am
  
  Re:
  Average...
  
  Did you even READ any of the back articles describing craigslist problems and their solutions? Do you read the articles or just come here to say it's FUD?
  
  Seriously, your entire scare/FUD campaign is getting old.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jay (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:15am
  
  Re:
  And just because you seem to want to be rather belligerant until a link is right in front of you:
  
  Craigslist Shuts Down Adult Services; Says It's Being Censored - and in the article, near the bottom:
  
  Salon.com - sex ads linger on Craigslist
  
  Your Post-Craigslist Guide to Buying Sex Online
  
  It's NOT FUD. It's actual fact based knowledge that you constantly ignore to pile up the rhetoric. Stop doing that!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - average_joe (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:40am
    
    Re: Re:
    Which of those articles prove that shutting down Craigslist did "little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution"?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Jay (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:48am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      *sigh*
      
      The last two, where it shows that the prostitutes merely moved elsewhere...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - average_joe (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:09pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        *sigh*
        
        The last two, where it shows that the prostitutes merely moved elsewhere...
        
        Some prostitution may have moved elsewhere, but that doesn't mean that overall prostitution wasn't slowed down or otherwise prevented.
        
        And for future reference, Gawker, where "today's gossip is tomorrow's news," is not generally cited as "proof" of anything. Nor is salon.com for that matter.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Jay (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 1:33pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        I'm merely showing the articles. I bet if you also looked at Vhenkar's evidence as well, it would show that prostitution has become quite complex.
        
        The reason I'm more inclined to believe his research is because this is the man that hung out with a crack den for 5 years to see their affect on a community.
        
        You absolutely ignored the graph on the Wired article that shows that it isn't going away.
        
        Basically, average, there's more evidence that the Craigslist option hasn't affected a prostitute's (or escort's) chances at the world's oldest profession.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:22pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Good point after millenia there are still hookers everywhere including in very very hazardous places for that profession like Iran or Pakistan LoL
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 6:15am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Actually, you might want to consider some of what goes on with something like CL escort ads:
        
        CL made it very easy for girls to casually work in that business. Buy a disposable phone, take a couple of mirror pics that don't show your face, put an ad on CL, and make a little fast money on your back. If you go looking on escort boards and stuff, you would have seen that CL was valued for it's "gems", girls who would appear for a day or two and disappear, usually students, house wives, and the like trying to make some extra cash the old fashioned way. CL makes it easy because it is the ultimate in fast communication, no commitment, no nothing. If you get up today and your husband is away on a business trip, heck, fire up CL and make a few hundred while he is gone.
        
        In the end, that is the real risk on a site like CL (or backpages now): It makes it to easy to work illegally in a casual manner, making it too easy, too simple, and too normal.
        
        Is prostitution itself going away? Nope. World's oldest profession isn't going to just disappear. The key question would be "who is buying, and who is selling". If the client base changes because there are no CL ads, or the girls working change because there are no CL ads, then there has been a change and a difference.
        
        The reason I'm more inclined to believe his research is because this is the man that hung out with a crack den for 5 years to see their affect on a community.
        
        Your mistake is assuming that crack-hoes are the entire market. Crack addled people will do whatever to get crack, CL or no CL. But they are only a subset of all working girls, and it is very hard to take that experience and broad brush it onto the rest of that "industry".
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:12pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Google search for scorts reviews about 1,590,000 results (0.15 seconds)
      
      WTF!
      
      Not to mention the scandals involving ex-AG's.
      
      Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal
      
      Now a WTF!
      
      Google search for "American prostitutes scandals" equals about 1,680,000 results (0.22 seconds)
      
      Prostitution is so pervasive that not even Sarah Pallin is getting it out of the shit storm (Sarah Palin husband paid for sex according Shailey Tripp)
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rekrul, 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:35pm
  
  Re:
  How do you know for a fact that shutting down the section on Craigslist did "little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution"? What evidence do you have to support this claim?
  
  What evidence do you have to support that it DID slow down or prevent prostitution?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - average_joe (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:51pm
    
    Re: Re:
    What evidence do you have to support that it DID slow down or prevent prostitution?
    
    None. But keep in mind, I'm not the one making a claim either way.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - anothermike, 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:18pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Yes, you are. You're questioning the existing claim without evidence to support an alternate view. Lern2scientificmethod, n00b. You can't present an different hypothesis without evidence to back it up. And all the evidence indicates that the delta, the change in prostitution, is a non-negative number.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - average_joe (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:18am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Yes, you are. You're questioning the existing claim without evidence to support an alternate view. Lern2scientificmethod, n00b. You can't present an different hypothesis without evidence to back it up. And all the evidence indicates that the delta, the change in prostitution, is a non-negative number.
        
        I am being scientific. Mike claimed that shutting down Craigslist did "little to nothing to actually slow down or prevent prostitution," yet he offered no evidence to support that claim. I don't believe there is any such evidence, so I'm not surprised he didn't offer any. I think he's so desperate to say how dumb it is that he's just making stuff up, so I called him out on it. I'm not presenting "an different hypothesis." I'm pointing out the lack of basis for someone else's hypothesis. Why don't you learn how to use reason, and then get back to me.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 5:48am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      The intention wasn't to "slow down" prostitution, so whether it did or not is irrelevant. Why so obsessed with some side-issue, or more precisely, the semantics of the side issue.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - average_joe (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:26am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        What is the source of your claim that "the intention wasn't to 'slow down' prostitution"? Whether or not it did is relevant to whether or not Mike's claim was based in reality. I think he just made it up, so that's why I pointed it out. It's interesting because he makes a living nitpicking every last detail of his opponents' statements, but he himself just makes up stuff when it suits him.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
        
        btrussell (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 8:04am
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
        Well, they recently shut it down in Toronto, even though prostitution isn't illegal, now look what is happening:
        http://www.seroundtable.com/google-maps-escorts-12929.html
        
        Apparently it is still okay to advertise in newspapers and phone books though.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 2:42pm
  
  Re:
  I don't know about him but here is how do I know it was all smoke and mirrors.
  
  Google search for "Los Angeles scorts" equals about 3,890,000 results (0.23 seconds)
  
  They even use Google maps to show you where they operate and go.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Not an electronic Rodent, 10 Feb 2011 @ 1:33am
  
  Re:
  I'm going to have to say it, Mike: It's faith-based FUD.
  Or possibly common wisdom since prostitution has been around for thousands of years and not a lot has ever slowed it down in any significant manner. Plus a very short trawl of the internet suggests that such services are available in many many many many other places so pure logic suggests that any single site is unlikely to have any effect. In central London for example you can't walk into a phone box without seeing 40 cards offering such services (despite putting up the cards being illegal), and such services are advertised in local papers (which is legal, sort of).
  So I'd say the onus is on you to come up with proof that it did have an effect.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - average_joe (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:19am
    
    Re: Re:
    So I'd say the onus is on you to come up with proof that it did have an effect.
    
    There is no onus on me, as I've made no claim about prostitution either way. I only pointed out that Mike's claim was baseless as he presented it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- nasch (profile), 13 Feb 2011 @ 6:36pm
  
  Re:
  Did you know "FUD" doesn't mean "something I disagree with"?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ron Rezendes (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:19am

AJ is the true FUD...
C'mon Joe - if there were a single shred of evidence (even doctored evidence)anywhere in the USA, then every damn Congressman, local AG, and sheriff who lynch mobbed Craigslist would be on Faux News and CNN showcasing what a great job they did in cracking down on prostitution. Of course, they'll expect to be re-elected for their efforts.

It didn't happen, so there is no evidence!

Tell you what Joe, why don't you go out into space and prove to me there isn't a vacuum out there and take your eff'd up FUD with you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- average_joe (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:41am
  
  Re: AJ is the true FUD...
  Stating something as a fact with no evidence to back it up is "faith-based." Misrepresenting things to garner a negative opinion of something is "FUD." If there is in fact no evidence, then Mike indeed proffered "faith-based FUD." You're only proving my point.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ron Rezendes (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:46pm
    
    Re: Re: AJ is the true FUD...
    I still maintain my position that if ANY good or reduced level of the aforementioned criminal activity actually DID occur, those poor misguided souls who led the witch hunt would be offering up some sort of evidence of their good deed. People who are elected to office thrive on these things and there is no way this one would have slipped through the cracks. Show me Joe - show me where shutting down the CL adult section ever helped even a little.
    
    My proof that it didn't is I personally see the same month to month crime statistics in my city and surrounding areas and this crime has not declined. Since a single source is not the best proof (for me anyway) I also witness first hand, the same amount of "traffic" in certain parts of San Diego as a I did only a year or two ago.
    
    I understand how easy it is to be the contrarian without a viewpoint of your own, or to even have the willingness to have your own opinion but really it does get rather old hearing someone claim there is no proof of anything simply because they wish to not believe anyone else whether it be MM or folks like myself who pass along their actual first hand knowledge. If you won't believe others then you need to go find your own proof and get away from the keyboard for a change!
    
    Often times you simply comes across as a child with their fingers in their ears yelling "I can't hear you! I can't hear you!".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - average_joe (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:22am
      
      Re: Re: Re: AJ is the true FUD...
      Show me Joe - show me where shutting down the CL adult section ever helped even a little.
      
      Why should I do that? I made no claim either way. I simply called out the person who did make a claim, a claim that appears to be totally made up.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 5:57am
    
    Re: Re: AJ is the true FUD...
    Pity you don't pick up your lying, shillboy friend TAM on the same issues, with the same frequency, and same pretend outrage, that you do with Mike. Funny that.
    
    A complete and total hypocrite. You've lost all integrity. And, no, that's not faith-based.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - average_joe (profile), 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:21am
      
      Re: Re: Re: AJ is the true FUD...
      LOL! Are you trying to be funny?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:22am

The problem is that law enforcement is too lazy and stupid to catch real criminals (they're too busy catching people who speed) that they want to always take the easy way out to stop it. Unfortunately, it only leads to restricting everyone else, invading our privacy, and it never works.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- anothermike, 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:32pm
  
  Re:
  In this case, the easy way out is the tools Craigslist built into their service to assist law enforcement in stopping crime.
  Those misguided AGs grandstanding against Craigslist shot their own cops in the foot. They have hobbled law enforcement efforts forever. Just like in the recording industry, when new players tried to work with the industry giants to offer their catalogs on new distribution channels, only to be sued into bypassing the old media, new commercial sites won't work with the cops to avoid being identified to these rampaging AGs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 10 Feb 2011 @ 7:29am
  
  Re:
  That argument is always a laugh - you make it sound like police don't know where there are hookers. OMG! If the customers can find the girls, the police can too. They don't need CL to point them out.
  
  You also have to understand that in order to make a case, the police need to have the girl actually solicit them. That would mean calling the girls, finding out a location, going to some random place (with a wire on) setting up an operation, and sending the guy in and hoping the girl solicits him.
  
  Sorry, but CL wouldn't help much.
  
  It isn't such a black and white world. The idea of pushing the ads off of CL (and other online properties) is to make is harder for casual clients to find WGs. You don't want to make it easy, you don't want to make it simple. They want the ads to be generic in nature and easily controlled (like yellow pages), in a manner that discourages transient sex workers, part timers, and the like. They want to make it harder for clients to find girls, and for girls to find clients.
  
  Catching criminals isn't the only job of law enforcement, it is also crime control and abatement. It's about keeping crime underground rather than in public. It's about making the criminal life less desirable to be part of, and less desirable to deal with.
  
  It is incredibly short sighted to say "but CL could have helped". There is already way more help than the police can work from. Whatever help CL would add is incredibly outweighed by it's harm.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - nasch (profile), 13 Feb 2011 @ 6:38pm
    
    Re: Re:
    The idea of pushing the ads off of CL (and other online properties) is to make is harder for casual clients to find WGs.
    
    And how's that going?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- sexy blonde, 30 Apr 2011 @ 9:23am
  
  Re:
  Actually law enforsement enjoy busting pros it's fun for them get to see naked womenPlus it always happens around the holidays so they don't have to worry about getting shot
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pickle Monger (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:40am

Uhmmm...

[...]it appears that Facebook has become the site of choice for prostitutes,[...]

Could someone please e-mail me some names in my area? LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 25 Jun 2012 @ 11:17am
  
  Re: Uhmmm...
  ya send some names my way to lol
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shadojak (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:45am

Prostitution......
God, as he said, legalize it so it can be taxed.

THEN you will see some interesting things, lol.

Like SCHOOLS for prostitutes, Sliding scale costs, Requirements for health checks every 6 months, Licenses.....

The list goes on.... and nowhere in it do i see any reason NOT to legalize it, lol.

Heck even the insurance companies would be involved, selling policies to hookers, lol

As far as I can see, would be a nice addition to the economy :)

But, as some church-based geek would say, what do i know?

my thought is, if they offend your church.....DON'T PATRONIZE THEM!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:52am
  
  Re: Prostitution......
  Legalizing prostitution will not stop illegal prostitution. Just look at gun laws for your example... people not allowed to buy or own a guy legally still get them illegally on the street. Gun laws do very little to stop criminals from obtaining guns, and every street cop knows this very well. It seems only the people too far away from the reality of the situation (politicians, average citizens) think otherwise.
  
  Illegal prostitutes would remain, and not only that, but a whole new industry of faked legal prostitution licenses and circumvented tests would exist.
  
  It is simply not a solution to a real problem.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Ron Rezendes (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:40pm
    
    Slavery is legal/popular again?
    "... people not allowed to buy or own a guy legally still get them illegally on the street."
    
    AZ where "...buying a guy..." is done in the Home Depot parking lot. However the state government who passed laws to deter this activity (because the Federal gov't is ineffective in enforcing it's own laws covering this same behavior) has come under fire as racist and bigots.
    
    Sorry the typo was easy money and humorous.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Rekrul, 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:45pm
    
    Re: Re: Prostitution......
    Legalizing prostitution will not stop illegal prostitution. Just look at gun laws for your example...
    
    Legalizing it wouldn't completely eliminate illegal prostitution, but it would reduce it to the point where it's no longer a major problem. Just look at liquor laws for your example...
    
    When the US government instituted prohibition and outlawed the sale of alcohol, an entire underground system sprang up around the illegal manufacture, distribution and sale of alcohol. Eventually, the politicians realized that it was a losing battle and repealed the law. How much of a problem is illegal liquor today?
    
    I'm sure that some crime is associated with illegal liquor, but when was the last time you read a news story about a politician calling for a crackdown on it? Or a report of the police busting a major illegal liquor ring? The fact is that by legalizing it (again), they basically destroyed the illegal market for alcohol such that it's no longer a major problem.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Jeff Rife, 9 Feb 2011 @ 1:06pm
    
    Re: Re: Prostitution......
    You are looking at the issue backwards. This not about attempting to prevent access, but rather granting access to a previously illegal good.
    
    Legalizing prostitution would result in it being like alcohol or tobacco sales. Both still have some people that do things to avoid the laws (taxes, who you can sell to, etc.), but this is the very small minority.
    
    On the other hand, laws that attempt to completely prevent access to desirable goods result in what you say about gun laws, with alcohol prohibition, drug laws, and even DRM in the same category...all are completely ineffective at preventing access to the "protected" good.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - (A), 9 Feb 2011 @ 3:48pm
    
    Re: Re: Prostitution......
    "Legalizing prostitution will not stop illegal prostitution". No, but anarchy would. You can't break the law if there's no law to break. As long as we have government, we will never have true freedom.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 6 Jun 2011 @ 7:45pm
  
  Re: Prostitution......
  this might be the biggest problem.and as a result,it would create an opportunity for other nations to view and involve in such activity if only they tend to chat with the prostitutes and seek information ...its becoming legalized for the world to see....task it out now................
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shadojak (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 11:57am

Yo, AC...learn to READ
I didn't say would be no illegal prostitution.... I said would be a large addition to the economy/taxbase.

And, if you are stupid enough to utilize an illegal prostitute, you get what you paid for :)

We DO still have laws against illegal prostitution, lol. And if we didn't, guaranteed, they would be in place at the same time that they legalized it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jared (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:43pm

Shut Down Red Light District
Why aren't these same attorneys shutting down the roads and intersections where IRL solicitation occurs? Sure, these roads also get legitimate, legal traffic, but so did the adult section of Craiglist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jared (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 12:43pm

Shut Down Red Light District
Why aren't these same attorneys shutting down the roads and intersections where IRL solicitation occurs? Sure, these roads also get legitimate, legal traffic, but so did the adult section of Craiglist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Suzanne Lainson (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 4:34pm

The beginning of the end of Facebook
Spam took over email.

Then the hookers moved into MySpace. An endless stream of women wanting to be friends on MySpace. The noise level got so high that many people moved on.

I've started seeing the pattern on Facebook. One of the techniques is for someone to tag one of your friends on Facebook. That puts their "Come see my photos" message into your news stream even though you're not friends with the hookers yourself. I've been marking those as spam as I see them, but the fact that they are even turning up at all suggests the same patten that screwed email and MySpace will happen with Facebook, too. Once it becomes too trashy, the "cool" kids will move on to something else and eventually everyone else will follow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anthony Askew, 9 Feb 2011 @ 4:51pm

I was going out of my way to avoid getting a facebook as well
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btrussell (profile), 9 Feb 2011 @ 8:04pm
  
  Re:
  Just give me face, book someone else Dano.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
depak, 12 Jan 2012 @ 4:19am

thanks tech dirt
Now I know where to score some hos
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
R. Howell, 25 Feb 2012 @ 11:54pm

Phyllis the Prostitutue
Shuts...I know of a prostitute who was on Craiglist and now she's back on the street broad day-light. Her name is Phyllis for those of you in Baltimore what a descent ------- All you have to do is go to the Main library on Cathedral St near Franklin ask about anyone who is standing around (the junkies) and they can tell you basically what time she usually shows up. Her drug of choice is crack. So she charges about $10.00 or just give her a rock and she'll be fine. Blk/Female around 40ish wears a ponytail most of the time, light skin complexion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Kitty, 23 May 2012 @ 6:22am

Facebook Prostitutes
A guy I had been dating added one of these Facebook prostitutes after we had moved things on to the next stage. I deleted him and had nothing more to do with him.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
veronica Castro, 24 Nov 2012 @ 7:51pm

Stop trying to regulate, ban, criminalize and tax every freaking thing in this country! As long as the employment, hookers prostitutes, is voluntary, brothels provide a distinct advantage in securing the safety of the sex workers and should be used the standard model.http://www.hookersprostitutes.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cindy, 27 Aug 2015 @ 9:51pm

lol
Omg
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jojo, 26 Mar 2017 @ 2:04pm

did not move
they change it to or on wemon seeking men
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rmguzman71, 1 Feb 2018 @ 2:23pm

Is that what happened at least mine was kinda free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
dg, 23 Apr 2018 @ 8:34pm

craigslist hookers and where did they go
well I will be honest they are walking in front of the motel 6 across the street from golf land here in AZ and tragedy is about to strike the light rail is nearing completion and if this dire situation dose not subside then we will get a flood of hookers from phoenix central station and only to end up here in mesa suck until Moses delivers his people to some where in AJ or east fare east Mesa well what do you think essay worthy or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rick, 30 Sep 2018 @ 1:56pm

Company
Company
[ link to this | view in chronology ]