While BBC Wants To Kill Off A Bunch Of Websites, Geeks Quickly Archive Them
from the internet-to-the-rescue dept
Last month, the BBC announced its intention to
kill off a bunch of websites, including Douglas Adams' old stomping grounds, H2G2. Apparently some of the sites were going to be archived, and others weren't -- but as you may know, the BBC
does not have the greatest of reputations when it comes to archiving old material. However, this is the internet. If someone announces they are going to get rid of something that other people would like saved, there are tools to save it.
Glyn Moody points us to a note from Ben Goldacre about how some "anonymous nerd"
archived all of the sites the BBC is set to take down (it cost him a whopping $3.99) and he's now set that archive free, so you, too, can help make sure this content lives on. The whole thing is available via a torrent file
at http://178.63.252.42/, which also has a description of the project, so have at it.
Filed Under: archives, bbc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Infringement?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BBC Kill Off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: BBC Kill Off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: BBC Kill Off
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: BBC Kill Off
They have a selection of websites each with its own font size, but because they're all "bbc.co.uk" most browsers will apply the same magnification to each.
So, if you have a site open in a tab, look at a different site and need to zoom the text up, when you return to the original tab the site is "broken". (New BBC "Design guidelines" mean that most of the sites have text enclosed in fixed-size panels, so if you zoom it up the bottom couple of lines disappears...)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: BBC Kill Off
(Also, these are the renewal prices, not the heavily discounted first year prices which, for .info, come to less than £50).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
And the Doctor Who tapes is a slightly different issue; that was about the BBC not having enough money due to excessive copyright stuff (during the "home taping" scare of the 70s/80s). Incidentally, Doctor Who actually survived quite well (the audio for all episodes remains, and some sort of video or stills for most); Z-Cars, in particular, was very badly hit by this, with about half of all episodes missing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Let's say I am a painter, and I offer lithographs for sale. I sell some, and then decide no longer to do it. Would the images on the website suddenly become public domain because I close the website down? What happened to my rights as an artist? Did putting it on the internet at all suddenly put my future rights at risk?
What strange logic you use.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
One of the sites is one where people were encouraged to recount their experiences during world war 2. Many of those who contributed are dead now. Don't those peoples families have the right to read the work that their loved ones left for them on what they were told was a site to record their memories for posterity?
Those memories would be lost forever if someone didn't step in and do something like this. The person who created this torrent deserves a medal. It's not like the BBC care about the sites anyway, they are about to junk them.
I have work of my own on h2g2. Hopefully that site will continue in some form but it makes no difference to me whether someone reads my work on a website or from a torrent download (although if the site continues it will have the most up to date version), so long as my work is still readable by others. I think most of us who are affected by these closures probably feel that way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
One of the sites is one where people were encouraged to recount their experiences during world war 2. Many of those who contributed are dead now. Don't those peoples families have the right to read the work that their loved ones left for them on what they were told was a site to record their memories for posterity?
Yes, and you have the right tomorrow to pull it down and no longer display the content. You own it.
Were you paid for your work on H2G@ or did you assign it to them in some manner? Did you retain rights on the originals? If you did work for hire, you don't really have rights to it, do you?
[ link to this | view in thread ]