The Ridiculous Trademark Saga Of Kennedy Fried Chicken

from the and-we-don't-even-like-fried-chicken dept

Mon, Feb 21st 2011 3:05pm — Mike Masnick

More trademark madness coming to us via an article in the NY Times, which tells the story of Abdul Haye, who recently received a stamp of approval for the trademark on "Kennedy Fried Chicken." Now, there are all sorts of problems with this. First of all, Mr. Haye did not create Kennedy Fried Chicken. It was actually created by another guy (both men are from Afghanistan, and apparently much of this saga involves Afghani ex-patriots in New York City). Haye worked at one of a few Kennedy Fried Chickens many years ago, and then started his own (without the blessing or licensing from the originator). Apparently, this was common in the Afghani community, where there are a ton of Kennedy Fried Chickens, most of which have no relation to one another (think: Ray's, Original Ray's, Famous Ray's, etc. when it comes to pizza in NYC).

Separately, of course, the very name Kennedy Fried Chicken has a separate problem, which is that the folks at Kentucky Fried Chicken didn't appreciate the name and sued many years ago... and won. So there shouldn't be any Kennedy Fried Chickens at all. Except, what saved the original Kennedy Fried Chicken was Kentucky Fried Chicken's decision to drop its full name and revert to the nickname KFC, leading it to no longer pay much attention to the Kennedy Fried Chickens, which continued to explode. And, yes, the original Kennedy Fried Chicken was created on purpose to play off of the KFC name, with a nod towards JFK.

However, Mr. Haye, despite not coming up with the name, not being the first, and not really having any sort of "right" to the name, did apply and get a trademark on it... and has now started threatening other Afghani shop owners who use the name. He's sent out 300 letters to others, telling them they have to pay him or he'll sue. He claims their "poor-quality chicken is going to kill my reputation." Must I point out that he copied the name in the first place? Anyway, those KFCs don't seem to have much interest in either paying Mr. Haye or backing down at all.

"We won't pay a penny," huffed Nour Abdullah, the manager of Kennedy Fried Chicken on Junction Boulevard in Corona, Queens, which seems indistinguishable from Mr. Haye's except for the fried shrimp balls and gyros on the menu. "I can rename the shop Munir Fried Chicken after my son or even New Kennedy Fried Chicken. Then let's see what he�s going to do."

A few doors down, Najib Ullah, a chicken fryer from Kabul, was equally defiant. "Anyone can own a Kennedy, and I've never heard of this Abdul Haye," he said. "Every place has a different owner: same chicken, different menu. So what�s the problem?"

As for the guy who created the original Kennedy Fried Chicken, Zia Taeb, even though he's long been out of the business, he seems to suggest he might jump into the legal fray as well:

He insisted that he -- not Mr. Haye -- was the rightful owner of the Kennedy brand. "He won't win because I know my people, and Afghans will never pay him," he said. "I will go after him."

Oh, and the biggest irony in all of this? At the very end of the article, Mr. Haye who kicked off this whole thing with his legal threats, tells the NY Times reporter over a dish of lamb chops at a different Afghani restaurant: "You know, Afghans don't even like eating fried chicken."

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: chicken, trademark
Companies: kennedy fried chicken, kentucky fried chicken, kfc

10 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 21 Feb 2011 @ 3:27pm

But who doesn't love suing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Feb 2011 @ 4:15pm

Didn't become the use of the name Kennedy Fried Chicken quite generic for this kind of establishments within the Afghan community? Generic terms are not trademarkable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Hobbs (profile), 21 Feb 2011 @ 4:36pm

I have a friend called Ken with something of an unfortunate surname. Ken Fucky tried chicken. But he didn't like it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Feb 2011 @ 4:54pm

trademarks != patents
However, Mr. Haye, despite not coming up with the name, not being the first, and not really having any sort of "right" to the name, did apply and get a trademark on it... and has now started threatening other Afghani shop owners who use the name.
Coming up with the name and being first doesn't necessarily matter if the one who was first is no longer using the mark. Trademark rights inure from use, not from being first. If he is using the mark he has the right to apply for a federally registered trademark. Trademark examiners look to see if the mark would be confusingly similar to an existing *registered trademark,* but not to common law uses, such as by other competitors. Part of the trademark application process is the step of publicizing the trademark application so that anyone with conflicting rights, such as a common law user, has the ability to oppose the granting of the registration. Even if there is no opposition prior to registration, there is a five year post-registration period where existing rights holders can petition to have the registration cancelled. Even after this five year period, the registration can still be cancelled if the mark is deemed generic or if it was acquired through fraud on the USPTO. If the originator wanted to retain his rights to the mark, he should not have abandoned the use of it. Other restaurant owners who feel that they have superior common law rights should have either enforced those rights before the registrant sought a federal registration or should have opposed the registration during the registration process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 21 Feb 2011 @ 5:32pm

Maybe the guys he's going after should rename to Fried Kennedy Chicken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- NAjib ullah, 22 Feb 2011 @ 12:08pm
  
  Re:
  Hes not only going after one guy, hes going after every owner of kennedy fried chicken.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 21 Feb 2011 @ 11:52pm

This is reminiscent of the famous battle between McDonald's and McDowell's restaurants. One had the golden arches, the other the golden arcs, etc.

They did a documentary on it; it was on cable the other night.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Phillip Vector (profile), 22 Feb 2011 @ 7:12am
  
  Re:
  Wasn't that from "The Golden Child" with Eddie Murphy?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Phillip Vector (profile), 22 Feb 2011 @ 7:20am
    
    Re: Re:
    Sorry.. Coming to America.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nitpicker, 22 Feb 2011 @ 4:24am

Ex-patriot?
Mike, I assume you mean expatriate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expatriate

This mistake is all too common, and gives the unfortunate impression that these people are no longer patriots. One can live abroad and still love their country! :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]