Senator Wyden Demands Debate Over Patriot Act
from the senator-wyden-hits-again dept
It's feeling like we should have a weekly section for "kudos to Senator Ron Wyden." Each week he seems to be the only major elected public official who seems to actually be fighting for the people, rather than for greater power for corporations and government. His latest is that he seems to be one of the few elected officials who are actually pushing for real debate about the "sunsetted" Patriot Act provisions. As you may recall, Congress has been rubber stamping extensions to the three provisions, which allow for very broad surveillance with very little oversight. Each time they extend the provisions, they claim there hasn't been enough time to debate the provisions, so we should just push it out again. But then no debate actually happens. It looks like Senator Wyden is looking to fix that:[The Patriot Act] was written and passed six weeks after the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history. Congress wisely included sunset dates for the Patriot Act's most controversial provisions, so that they could be thoughtfully considered at a later time. After ten years, it is clearly time for that debate."I'd argue it's well past the time for that debate, but that's a minor quibble. Wyden is also pushing for legislation that narrows the surveillance provisions of the Patriot Act and further protects our Fourth Amendment rights.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: debate, patriot act, privacy, ron wyden
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Riiight!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You realize he's on the left?
I'm an Oregon voter, and have mixed feelings about Wyden. On these sorts of issues, he's a breath of fresh air. On other issues (primarily fiscal), he's a fairly typical overspending/overreaching democrat. No worse than most, but no better.
So my support for Wyden tends to shift depending on what I'm more scared of at the moment: National fiscal collapse, or Orwellian police state.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Fewer still are willing to stand virtually alone in opposition to legitimately disturbing pieces of legislation.
Wyden is showing that he is the least of quite a few evils. That's good enough for me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Abolish
It was intended to be a tool for tyranny and will inevitably be used for such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting first sentence.
Actually, why doesn't Techdirt have a "Kudos" section? There have been plenty of positive articles of late and a "Kudos" section would be nice to see.
My first nomination would go to Nina Paley for her recent "copyrights promote lawsuits" comic strip.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not going to matter anyway
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not going to matter anyway
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sen. Wyden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sen. Wyden
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I just hope.
Politicians do not want to be seen as condoning terrorism, thus we have the Patriot Act.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I just hope.
Voting against the patriot act would not necessarily imply "condoning terrorism". Does anyone really think Feingold or Kucinich condone terrorism? And I doubt anyone thinks the same of the ten who recently voted against it either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I just hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I just hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I just hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I just hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I just hope.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Debate"
It doesn't matter how long they debate for, it won't change any senator's vote. 80+ will vote to re-extend because if they don't, their opponent in the next election will tag them with "soft on terrorism."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rand Paul
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It always begins...
Did anyone REALLY expect that the Patriot Act would EVER expire?
REALLY?!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Senator Wyden for PRESIDENT!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]