Hackers Claim They Can Unban Banned PS3s While Banning Unmodded PS3s
from the don't-mess-with-the-hackers dept
We recently noted that Sony had announced plans to ban any jailbroken PS3 from the PlayStation Network, because Sony apparently wants to punish people who want to put back features that Sony advertised and then removed. It appears that move may end up backfiring as well. Jay was the first of a few of you to point to a report that some hackers claim they've figured out how to unban banned PS3s and at the same time to issue bans on unmodded PS3s. There are some questions as to how accurate the report is, but if true, it would suggest another failed strategy by Sony. Will it ever realize that trying to clamp down on its own users is a bad idea?![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I don't know much about it
Ether way, it sounds like Sony has one hell of a security hole in their authentication servers that needs to be closed.
I cannot fault Sony for banning modded PS3s from PSN. They do have an obligation to their users and their developers. Banning is an understandable and reasonable answer to a perceived threat. Lawsuits are not (Just to make that clear).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't know much about it
What I don't appreciate is how the blame is pushed onto those who were genuinely curious about solving this issue, along with the remote removal of software that was legitimately purchased (OtherOS is a good example, and NO, "But...but...PIRACY!!!" is a shit excuse for removing functionality..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I don't know much about it
it isn't "but.. but... PIRACY", it is "but.. but... cheaters online" that really drives the issue, which is why they are banning modded consoles from their online game play. It is pretty logical and very needed, otherwise the entire PS3 online experience could be ruined (and a very good business model destroyed in the process).
The hackers here shouldn't be celebrated. This is clearly malicious and nasty. Once again, Techdirt ends up support law breaking. Congrats Mike! You are scoring well today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
it isn't "but.. but... PIRACY", it is "but.. but... cheaters online" that really drives the issue, which is why they are banning modded consoles from their online game play. It is pretty logical and very needed, otherwise the entire PS3 online experience could be ruined
Are you sure about this? Do you have links to such statements from Sony? Or are you just trolling again?
As well, I think that if you went through GeoHot's research, you'd see that he didn't do it so that he could improve his aimbot...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
While I do not agree with how Mike presented the article, he is essentially right. With all that Sony's done to piss off the people who willingly pay, it's inevitable that Sony's latest tactic will be the target.
If Sony had just banned the systems initially and ended it there, this would have never come about. These people would be complaining about being banned, but they would have been shrugged off. It's what you get for modding your PS3. But because Sony made this a "David vs. Goliath" thing, they are seen as the underdogs, not just simple hackers.
I don't condone what these people are doing, I'd be willing to bet that Mike doesn't ether, but don't let Sony off the hook. They started the war, now they have to fight it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Also, I didn't GET a DMCA agreement. And you missed the point completely. Again. IT's not about what was done. It's about the attitude projected. And Sony is acting like a petulant two-year-old on crack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Thats AND, not OR
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
and you'll get neither and like it. you get nothing. good day sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
> protection or security measures.
Sure there is, if those security measures are preventing me from doing something I'm legally entitled to do with something I've legally purchased.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
While I believe in keeping modded consoles offline with respect to fairness, I completely disagree with your "hackers here shouldn't be celebrated" line and have felt that way ever since taking apart my first transistor radio apart at age 7 to see what makes it work and to discover what "new" thing I could make with the parts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Yes - but the hack has legitimate uses beyond either.
The problem is that Sony was too lazy to set up their security properly.
The system is flawed and they shouldn't be taking it out on those who want the other OS functionality.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Why are cheaters such a big problem? Have you ever had any game being utterly ruined by cheaters?
I used to play Call of Duty 4 online a lot, and sure as clockwork, in about every "session" a cheater would pop up. Some had your typical aimbot, while others were invulnerable. It was a bummer.
So what are you going to do? If the admins are around, they can kick him, no problem. But if they aren't, you have no choice but to leave to another server. And since there were literally thousands of servers to chooses from, and since I was in it just for the heck of it (I play for !FUN!), I could just switch to a different server. Heck, if it wasn't for cheaters, I would have never found a really cool server I once found.
Or, if they are not invulnerable, you can go cheater fishing. Band together with friends and ONLY target the cheater. Great fun! They get really pissed off!
But I don't see cheaters as a major issue. They can be easily dealt with, same way as trolls. The worst kind of player is not the cheater, but those that ruin everyone's game by camping near vehicles and taking them for a joy ride (not in CoD), or people that ignore flags in capture the flag and go camping with a sniper rifle, for example.
Bad team players ruin your game faster than cheaters, and there's zilch you can do about it. Oh sure, you can start a vote to kick him out, but what are the chances of the other team voting him out? You can't complain or you'll look like a baby or a sore loser.
So, the "but cheaters" scream does not convince me. Get some REAL friends and kick cheater butt. Or start your own server.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
I don't play online games anymore for exactly this reason. People mod the software, give themselves unfair advantages, and ruin the experience. Why pay $X per month for an online gaming experience when a significant number of the players are cheating?
Or, if they are not invulnerable, you can go cheater fishing. Band together with friends and ONLY target the cheater. Great fun! They get really pissed off!
If I wanted to play THAT game, I wouldn't mind. But I signed up to play the game as presented, not to play "tag the cheater". With more and more people trying to cheat (and with widely spread cheats) most games collapse under their own weight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Or you can do what I do and start a private game with only people I know. I'm not much for socializing with people I don't know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not buying it...
But saying the world is going to hell in a handbasket because you found ONE cheater out of all of the people that enjoy a game means you aren't trying hard enough to have fun.
Quit having fun, guy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
And people bought the PS3 with the other OS functionality, they are were trying to use it as advertised. So who wins there?
Personally, you guys take all the fun out of online games. Your constant accusations of cheaters drives the developers/studios to overreacting. For what, so you can have everyone see your achievements, and worship your uber-ness? What does that get you? I pay for the gaming experience, if I enjoy the game I'll continue. Eventually the griefers, cheaters, hackers and the like get out of hand. But by that time the game is passe and a new one has my attention.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
I'm sorry, but I can't agree here. Very few people are interested in the "other OS" functionality only to run another OS, they rather look at it as an easy way to back door the machine, to copy software, and to mod their consoles to work differently from standard, especially online.
I cannot think of anyone I know who has a PS3 and has used the OS feature only to run an OS. They all hack like crazy, using that as the back door (it's sort of a nice bootloader, if you like).
Personally, you guys take all the fun out of online games. Your constant accusations of cheaters drives the developers/studios to overreacting. For what, so you can have everyone see your achievements, and worship your uber-ness?
I don't care about any uber-ness. I play games to relax and enjoy myself. In a room full of cheaters, it is very hard to enjoy myself. That lowers the value of the online portion of the PS3's appeal, and in turn makes me less likely to be a customer and makes Sony lose my business, through no fault of their own.
All the stuff in this thread is all whining from the people who want to be able to pirate games, mod them, and have artificial "uber-ness". It's sad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
F. YOU!
I don't buy hardware to have it downgraded or blocked or tampered with in any way, that goes against my rights to own something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
I'm sorry, but I can't agree here. Very few people are interested in the "other OS" functionality only to run another OS, they rather look at it as an easy way to back door the machine, to copy software, and to mod their consoles to work differently from standard, especially online.
I specifically bought the PS3 over the 360 when it came out because it gave me the capability to run MythTV on it and use it as an awesome DVR and as a powerful gaming console. I didn't buy it for one or the other, I bought it for bot, and when they took away OtherOS I was faced with a choice: which do I want to do more? My answer? Any company that tries that has committed fraud against my and I will no longer do business with them.
They took a reliable customer, one who buys roughly one game a month and has for the better part of two decades, and turned him against them. Way to go guys.
And yet here you are saying people like me don't exist, and that if we do we're lying cheaters behind closed doors. You, my friend, are the reason we can't have nice things.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
But I digress....
It still boils down to Sony not working with their fan base. I have yet to see any mattress company sue anyone for what is clearly not the intended use of their mattresses....
http://www.subwaybedrace.org/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Me: Good morning
AC: It's not morning in Japan you communist-fascist-Nazi!
Me: I saw someone broke into your car last night, do you need help or a ride to work?
AC: You bastard! You broke into my car! I'm having you arrested
Me: The suicide bomber killed 10 people
AC: You support terrorism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Linux users - After having taken off the OtherOS, these are the people that come back to reimplement that feature.
Homebrewers - Love to play their own games without having to buy expensive developer kits.
Region coding - destroys a market by making the world into sections. Sony would still get the money, but it would be in a different region that collects that revenue.
---------------------------
So with all of that said, Sony is the one that has to change. They have to find a way to convince we, the people, to support their products.
They have to secure their PS3s and find a way to allow people to have a good machine without going overboard and suing their customers. Sony hasn't learned from their past, so they are doomed to repeat it. That isn't our fault.
Nor is it the fault of Techdirt to show the downturns of Sony's "head in the sand" strategy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Wow, cheating in video games in illegal now? Does a few minutes of aimbotting earn you the death penalty?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
stripping features? not smart.
having a set up that can actually be hacked in this way? not smart at ALL.
those hacking the network should not be celebrated, true. one could even legitimately make a case for taking action against them. on the other hand, feature stripping.
in the case of this particular article there is no right side, and the article itself doesn't take one.
i suggest finding a nice bridge to hide under.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
I've re-read the article three times now and I still can't locate the part where Mike says he supports this course of action.
Can you please cite it for me, preferably as a direct quote?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't know much about it
using a (currently) untraceable mod for unbanning and a traceable mod to ban(hopefully sony didnt ever plan to ban automatically and has huge issues w/ it)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I mean, really now. Sony will never win this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Killed the secondary market
Game makers want to stop resale of games, but resale of game consoles is a boon for them. A resold console means that the new owner may buy games. Even if the new owner only buys one or two new games it is still better for the company than having the old unit sit in a closet or landfill. The console itself was probably sold at a loss, so anything that extends its life is a win for the company.
Further, the sale of old consoles helps sell new consoles. Gamers routinely sell old consoles on Ebay when new models come out. I doubt that they would be so eager to buy the new consoles if they knew that there was no market for the old ones.
Sony's action was bound to have a lot of unintended consequences. Killing the PS3 console resale market may be one of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Killed the secondary market
So this is really "social engineering" labeled as "hacking" to give it a more negative spin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Killed the secondary market
By calling it hacking, people get to pretend it wasn't their own stupid fault for being fooled.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Killed the secondary market
(actually, in NZ politics it'll probably get you further than 'hacking')
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Killed the secondary market
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Killed the secondary market
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You can't. Because its a bullshit excuse.
Yes, the NEW hack can cause all this and worse. That's what happens when you lock the front door. Now we've gone in through the back, and discovered all the secrets.
Seriously, how would you cheat in online multiplayer games online, using the linux install? Run PS3 games on an emulator, running on YDL? Right, cause that wouldn't have issues at all...
I mean, what kind of system doesn't use server-side validation and relies solely on client side data? If the game designers left these kinds of issues in their code, let them fix it, that's why we have the ability to update the system and games.
Stop attacking your customers, Sony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I may be wrong as well, but from what I understand it was removed not for cheating, but for piracy. Some hacker said he had found a way to use the Other OS option to allow the use of copied games, but he wasn't going to release the code since he found no other use for it yet. Hearing that, Sony freaked out and completely removed the Other OS option. They shrugged it of claiming it was for security reasons (possibly the origin of the cheating thing).
This, on top of the removal of the PS2 compatibility and other actions that Sony has taken in the name of anti-piracy, started a cat and mouse game that continues here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
The PS3 emulated PS2 (and PS1) like the PS2 did: The PS2 had a PS1 chipset inside of it to provide physical emulation, instead of a software emulation. Since the PS3 was selling at a big loss, they cut PS2 (and PS1) emulation out because it saved them the money from shoving a PS2 and PS1 into it. That didn't have anything to do with piracy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
i stick my old ps1 FF7 discs in there, it runs the game quite happily... with added bonus anti-piracy warnings (that you don't see on the PS1)
i stick FF8 in there and it just shows the playstation logo from back in the PS1 days then fails, though.
no idea what's up with that, really.
i think Railroad tycoon 2 might work, but i don't really remember, it's been a while since i tried that.
apparently it has something to do with the PS2 using an incompatible GPU or some such (so it needed extra hardware to do that) while the PS1 just used it's CPU for everything (which the PS3 is entirely capable of emulating). the early model ps3s had the extra hardware in them to run ps2 stuff.
or at least, such is how it was explained to me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now that being said sony is not attacking anyone who is not using there Online service since that is the bases for there case.
STOP RIPPING OFF COMPANYS AND CREAT YOUR OWN STUFF CUSTOMERS. IS THAT TO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
That was an amazing impersonation of Angry Dude. But you forgot to hit return after every sentence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
So when your car stop functioning and you need to upgrade your OBD-II that will be ok right?
They have no right to reverse or try to reverse or punish people for doing something with what they legally bought a) it is not their business b) is weasel tactic to keep market share.
Sony has no right to try and stop people from moding anything, thank God I didn't build a render farm using PS3s, you know that is why Cell will die and nobody will program for it ever.
So the U.S. army is a bunch of douches? hundreds of higher education institutions are douches?
F. YOU!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Forgot Toshiba.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I don't know much about it
I suppose the reason Counter-Strike did so poorly was because of all the hackers? /s
Hackers/Glitchers = not an issue
Dedicated Servers = the issue
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Add value
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
STOP this Crap people
removed. I did this with complete knowledge that I would rather have access to the PSN then keep the Other OS.
1. If you did not want the other OS option removed you should not have updated your system.
2. None of the newer PS3 ever came with this option so half the people complaining have some kind of mental damage that keep them from understanding what they bought.
3. If you want to pirate games and you are an American then turn yourself into the police. real Americans don't steal from anyone they will design there own software and use it on there own servers and offer there own Online service and not rip off a service provided by other company.
4. If you do not get any of the above. Turn yourself over to the police because your to stupid to handle livening in a normal society
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
Now, THAT's funny.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
"real Americans don't steal from anyone . . ."
"Now, THAT's funny."
Hey it's what I believe and it is an honerable thing to stand by. Me being an american It what I think all americans should strive for . I can not speak for any other culutures...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
Look, Sony advertised that the OtherOS feature was included. Then they took away that feature. They should give anyone who was using it (whether it was for a game or to learn how to program on a cell processor) the opportunity to turn it in for a full refund. Just 'cause we're 'Mercuns don't mean we ain't gots no laws about them thar fals advercatin' all over folks. If'n yoo dun understood that, yu shuld turn yerself intoda police fer bein' two stuped to liven wit' tha rest of us decent folk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
'Don't feed the trolls'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
Not to mention that "not stealing" is one of the ten commandments, conceptualized a few kilo-years ago. How old is your country again?
BUT please do go on, I'm just pointing out why ppl mind have found your post funny..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
A) Choosing between playing new(ish) games and keeping your OtherOS feature is not a choice, the console was advertised as being able to do both.
B) Americans steal...because everybody steals. We've diluted the word so much that me taking a photograph of a wedding is now stealing (according to the photographer). Nor is everybody in a good country a paragon of virtue.
C) If you're stupid enough to write the drivel you've posted, turn yourself into a Darwinian Reeducation Center, your genes have been deemed unfit for the next generation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
removed."
And from the sounds of it, didn't use it.
"1. If you did not want the other OS option removed you should not have updated your system."
And remove PSN.
"2. None of the newer PS3 ever came with this option so half the people complaining have some kind of mental damage that keep them from understanding what they bought."
The Other OS option was just software. It can be added back with a download. It's stupid to remove and deny functionality just because you're afraid of something that's not actually a problem.
"3. If you want to pirate games and you are an American then turn yourself into the police. real Americans don't steal from anyone they will design there own software and use it on there own servers and offer there own Online service and not rip off a service provided by other company."
Read a history book, and, for the record, it's un-American to claim someone is guilty until proven innocent.
"4. If you do not get any of the above. Turn yourself over to the police because your to stupid to handle livening in a normal society"
Oh, we "get it". We get that you are wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
As an American, I am offended that you would devalue the long-standing entrepreneurial tradition in this country of ripping off other peoples' ideas for profit. It goes as far back as Edison taking credit for the light bulb, up through windshield wipers and Windows 3.1, and all the way to Mark Zuckerburg taking credit for the Winklevoss' Facebook idea. How DARE you say real Americans don't steal! ONLY real Americans steal, damn it! D:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
Stop acting like your some how superior. Sony started a war that they will never win. They're causing far more harm to their community and lost far more money now then they would have had to spend on just keeping the OtherOS option.
Sony failed and is trying to use the courts to solve an unsolvable problem. Things will never go back to how they were and destroying their community seems like a very short sighted tactic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
(and if it's not, some legislates, lobbyists, and lawyers need shooting in the nuts repeatedly.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Seriously the lamest excuse since "it not u its me"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
2. Still leaving a lot of people and more like me who don't own one but can still call Sony's handling of the whole affair laughable and dumber than a bag of lobotimised monkeys. Your point was?
3. Does it only count if you're american then? ALso: Isn't copyright infringement civil? So the police wouldn't be really interested, would they? Non-sequitur. Nothing is stolen. So the definition of "real american" only includes those with genius-level programming skills to single-handedly replicate the collective effort in the average game. Good to know. I wasn't aware you had quite such an immigration problem with only a few thousand "natives" at best.
4. I understand the above just fine - all total ranting pointlessness, but perfectly comprehensible. It's just you I don't understand and that's just fine because I'm sure I wouldn't like the weather on your planet anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
good job :D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
Updates often exist to correct manufacturer defects in the product's software. When Sony sells the product they should sell it without such defects. If the product has a defect then customers have a right to have such defects corrected. The customers were sold the product under the pretext that it will not have defects or that future defects will be corrected. They were also sold the product under the pretext that they can freely switch between the OtherOs and the software that the PS3 came configured with. To then remove such a selling point of the product is false advertising. It means that people are either stuck with the OtherOs, which is different from what they were promised when they sold the product (that they can freely transition from one to the other), or that, upon switching and updating their firmware to one with fewer defects (and perhaps fewer security holes and security holes become a big problem once they are discovered if no update is installed to correct them) they will be unable to switch back, the ability to switch back once again being a feature that was promised to them. Or, perhaps they can switch to the old firmware from the OtherOS (not sure how that works, if they can store the old firmware and restore it), but then they will be stuck with defected firmware that potentially has security holes that everyone now knows about thanks to the new update that fixes them (and the fact that people can now look at the new updates to determine what security holes, if any, they attempt to correct and then they can use those security holes on unupdated systems).
When people bought the PS3 they had a reasonable expectation that it will support the other OS and that they will still be able to keep their system up to date at the same time. Sony implied it. Sony didn't tell anyone otherwise. Sony said that the PS3 supports the use of another OS, it doesn't specify that it only supports another OS under the condition that you can't update your firmware. The assumption is that the other OS is supported with the ability to update your firmware (not to mention, certain features may stop working on older firmware a while after newer firmware has been released, features that previously did work on such older firmware). To then require people not to update their firmware in order to use the other OS is deceitful and fraudulent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
should read
"The customers were sold the product under the pretext that it will not have defects or that such defects will be corrected in the future"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
So if Microsoft suddenly decides to remove the calculator that comes with their operating system on the next update, without warning, will their argument be "If you want to keep the calculator then don't update your operating system." I'd like to see how far that gets them in court. Sure, many people probably don't even use the calculator that often. But some people use it at least sometimes. Microsoft can't just randomly revoke features after the fact without warning people of such a possibility before they bought the OS. Why can Sony?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: STOP this Crap people
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: STOP this Crap people
2. Same as above
3. Software Piracy is not "theft" this has been explained multiple times here. Stealing is quite American ever since Columbus discovered America and killed the natives and took their land.
4. If you can't do a simple search on this site to get a grasp on a decent arguement then you're too stupid to handle being in a digital society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
This mod that leads to the modded console might, and probably can be used to make cheating easier. However, that does not mean that every modder is using it to cheat, or to pirate. It is a very unfair label to place on them. Because of that I cannot condone what Sony is doing with banning people just because they mod. They should get some solid proof that people are actually cheating / pirating and not just "you modded so you are banned".
As an AC above gave a good post on, there are plenty of ways to deal with cheaters. However, the topic of Mike's article is the modders. And you guys need to stop assuming that a modder is a cheater or pirate. They are 3 separate groups that likely overlap some, but nowhere near entirely. I would understand banning the cheaters, but not just because a console is modded.
A large part of the reason Sony is catching backlash for this is because of their scorched earth approach. They are not going after the 'bad' guys here, they are just nuking the entire group from orbit and taking down all of the legitimate people at the same time. And that, is why they are seen as the bad guys here. They are just being lazy and anti consumer. If they took the time and effort to only affect the bad people, a lot more people would be on their side (including me).
The whole point from me here is the subject of my post: Just because somebody is a hacker (or modder in this case) does not make them a cheater at the games, and it also does not make them a pirate. Those three categories would have some overlap, but they are not all within one circle.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Nobody there cared about stealing actual xbox games. That'd be like, the most boring thing you could've possibly done with a modded xbox.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Awaiting either no reply (because you know you won't come over...it comes from being afraid) or an ad-hominem attack.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
I could send you pics, but that wouldn't prove much of anything. I guess you'll just have to believe some of us are out here. However, if you're ever in Northeast Texas I'm more than happy to show you my stuff and show you that there are those of us who don't have any pirated games but still like to mod for several different reasons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Im glad to hear there are legit users out there still brewing, but one has to admit the appeal of free games and cheating is what draws most to the scene. Perhaps, gladly, we are the minority here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
So what who cares I don't, cheating in games is not important, but my absolute trust on what I buy is, I don't want to buy a car in the future and have it downgraded, I don't want to buy a insulin pump and have it downgraded, I don't want my F'ing fridge locked because I changed something that the company selling the stupid fridge didn't like it.
This is the most horrible act any company could do and everyone should be complaining this is an assault on the right of ownership people have, I am "buying" something to discover it was really a lease or some weasel talk about how licenses are different that is just BS.
You want to be ass raped by Sony go ahead, the rest of us will never buy anything from that crappy company ever and anybody saying this is ok is the real douche if not a real criminal.
Just to state how this make me angry, if people got the Sony executives beaten on the streets and I was on that jury I would set everybody free.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Do you know what a cluster is? Do you know that programming for a cluster is different than programming for a standard processor? Do you understand that a quad core is not the same thing as a cluster?
Repeating over and over that "only some people use the OtherOS" or "only some people use the OtherOS legitimately" doesn't make your arguments any less stupid. Once you buy something, it is yours, and you should be able to use it as you wish. If they wanted to ban people from PSN, fine; but you can't even use it for Netflix if you don't update the software.
Also, you keep referring to the EULA (well, you called it the DMCA but I'm pretty sure you have no idea what you're talking about), are you aware that EULAs have been regularly thrown out in court as being too 1-sided, too vague, and unenforceable?
Good lord, you are shillin' hardcore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
http://hackaday.com/
And call everybody cheaters and thieves and see what happens.
No one there "BUY" F'ING HARDWARE to have it tampered with after, no one there would buy a brick that the owner wouldn't let go.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3_hardware
A cheap render farm with 248 gigaflops using normal processors would cost something in the ballpark of 6,000 dollars.
http://kdmurray.net/2008/05/24/diy-render-farm-186gigaflops/
So you are just an idiot who doesn't know about hardware great, a f'ing idiot shilling for Sony.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
I must clearly be a HackerPirateCommieJew. -.-
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Citation requested.
Please don't pull numbers out of your ass and expect anyone to believe they are fact. It makes you look ignorant and your finger probably smells like sh!t too! Maybe you are just padding your "body of work" for the next available RIAA or MPAA position available.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
GTFO
http://n4g.com/news/506395/how-many-people-use-linux-on-ps3-for-internet-lets-find-out/com#c-35326 56
This article states ONLY 0.66% OF PS3 USERS ACTUALLY USED THE OTHER OS FEATURE/LINUX. MEANING 99% OF ALL THOSE CRYING AND WHINING ABOUT IT'S REMOVAL ARE FULL OF SH*T, AND ONLY LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE TO JUSTIFY THEIR CHEATING/PIRACY. Get off you high horse dipsh*t and retort. I'll be waiting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GTFO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: GTFO
That "aricle" is based on the percentage of PS3 visitors to his particular blog. A whopping 1210 visitors is NOT statistically significant.
BTW, I'm a linux user as well, and enjoyed the YDL OS on my PS3. It made a nice media center with my server running Ubuntu.
Now I have to use some software to stream music and video to my PS3.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: GTFO
That "article" is based on the percentage of PS3 visitors to his particular blog. A whopping 1210 visitors is NOT statistically significant.
BTW, I'm a linux user as well, and enjoyed the YDL OS on my PS3. It made a nice media center with my server running Ubuntu.
Now I have to use some software to stream music and video to my PS3.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GTFO
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: GTFO
That is why when I read that Sony was banned in Europe for patent violations and every PS3 must be seized and destroyed, I just laughed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Sure, if you use a shitty XBOX thats about all you can do with it. The ability to use an IBM Cell Processor with 7 working cores is why most people want a modded ps3. Learn your hardware.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
And even if it was 90%, that still means that Sony is being lazy and banning people who don't deserve it. My point stands even with your numbers that have no proof.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
Well when Sony start paying up to LG and have the PS3 legalized again in Europe you come talk about DMCA and that BS you like to talk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Hacker does not Equal Cheater does not equal Pirate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When hell, or something, freezes over
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: get real
Do you believe those that hack are doing something wrong if all they want to do is run a homebrew game?
Nobody has the right to alter THEIR proprietary software. Like nobody can sample a MC hammer song without paying MC hammer a stipend. It's their OS, like it or not.
Wrong. If I want to reverse engineer Sony's software I have the right to do it (sharing it with others may pose problems though). Just like I can resample MC Hammer's song anyway I wish for my own personal enjoyment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: get real
Never said I ran homebrew, I don't even own a PS3.
I simply asked you a question (which you didn't answer).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: get real
I believe that anyone who owns a PS3 has a natural right to alter Sony's proprietary software on that PS3, and I also believe that anyone has a natural right to sample an MC Hammer song for use in a derivative work. I am, therefore, led to the conclusion that certain DMCA restrictions on hacking and the extension of copyright to derivative works are both improper, and should removed from their respective laws.
On the other hand, I do believe that Sony has the right to forbid modded PS3 units from playing on PSN, because PSN is an entity that they own, and they can restrict access in any way that is made quite clear before a user purchases a PS3. That does not mean I necessarily think it is wise for Sony to do this, of course; that is a business decision, not a moral one, and I don't know enough about Sony's business to make any judgment.
By the way, you should write "within its rights", not "within it's rights".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: get real
CITATION NEEDED!!!
Oh it's the usual douche, never mind.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: get real
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
There is something more fundamental, and that is the the right to own something.
Software is being used in more and more things everyday and this is just a dangerous precedent that could lead to a lot of problems for people in all walks of life.
Today is a game console who cares?
Tomorrow will be your car, your phone, your security system, your house who knows, once it gets out of the hands of the manufacture they have no business trying to tell other how they should use what they f'ing bought with their f'ing money.
That is why everyone should boycott Sony and not buy anything from them, so this is a example to other stupid people who think this is a good idea, more the laws should be changed to not allow this kind of behavior.
I don't f'ing buy hardware to have it disabled or tampered after by some asshole that thinks he still own what he sold me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There is a small subset of people who want to use Linux/Homebrew on the PS3. You know, you HAVE to know that the majority of people don't give a rats ass about the OtherOS option, all they want is free games.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The problem with sweeping generalizations (a logical fallacy), is that they often cause people to make arguments that seek to punish the whole for the actions of the few.
Fortunately our legal system usually gets things right when it comes to the big questions. For example, last week the SCOTUS ruled in favor of the sign toting hate mongers better known as the Westboro Baptist Church because they recognize that ensuring free speech for everyone is more important than stopping some speech which we don't like.
Unfortunately our legal system usually gets things wrong when it comes to the little questions. I appreciate that Sony is manufacturing a product which people wish to use and enjoy; however, I don't see why that gives Sony the right to behave with as much authority as the police (in their little realm) but with far less oversight. Do you know a judge ordered the that Sony could access every IP address that was used to access the original hackers website? Where does Sony's authority end? Do I even own a PS3 after I buy it? Or would you equate it to something more like a rental? If it is a rental then why don't I have any of the rights which come along with renting any other goods?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Ohhh, 5 million ... well I'm convinced. Of course, 1/4 of those are news sites reporting on the lawsuit and half of them are just forum posts like "ps3 iso is whicked Swizzet!!" ... so that sort of puts a damper on your 5 million.
Unfortunately, logic and facts do not support your hypothesis. There are hundreds, if not thousands of sites for PS3 hacks, homebrew and ripped ps3 ISO files.
What hypothesis are you referring to exactly. I have a problem with Sony overreaching what the law allows and I have an even bigger problem with what the law already allows. Why on earth should Sony be allowed to know the IP address of every person who visited the original hackers site? What standing does Sony have to sue individuals who are cracking their system to play homebrew or downloaded games?
Should Sony have been allowed to sue people using the walkman to play copied cassette tapes? Should LG be allowed to sue people using their TVs to watch downloaded movies?
My "hypotheses" is that the court has allowed Sony to move forward with a lawsuit but Sony doesn't have a horse in that race. Some will argue that the DMCA circumvention provisions make this illegal but I don't understand how electronic products can be treated differently from anything else you purchase.
What's next, can Hamilton Beech add software to their toasters that keeps them from toasting bagels and then sue anyone who disables the software? Try thinking about tomorrow when you're making decisions today.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
circular logic
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
How many of those sites advertising PS3 iso's and hacks went down after 3.21 was released?
Answer: None.
Why? Because the OtherOS had very little to do with piracy.
So obviously all those cheaters DON'T need the OtherOS to run them, or they'd be complaining too.
Honestly cheating has not gone down one bit since the OtherOS got pulled, and neither has piracy.
And one other thing. Its not sony's problem if there is cheating in games. Thats the developers fault. So if someones hacking MW2, thats InfinityWard's problem. They have to solve it.
Thank god Sony doesn't run the US government, their approach to solve real piracy would be to nuke Somalia.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
POINT
So, I can install Linux and get onto their service?
or
I can Halt updating the console, and it will HURT PSN??
LOL of the week award.
Go look a company called Steam powered...STEAM GAMES..Half life 1-2 and many other games..from Linux/PC/MAC.. do you REALLY think its a problem?
IF sony would OPEN up the service, they MIGHT have PC users jumping onto the wagon. Insted of CLOSING the console MARKET...OPEN IT.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: POINT
Are you denying modded consoles, if connected to the PSN can't and won't ruin the integrity of the PSN? Are you trying to say that the only reason anyone would even mod a console is for homebrew and Linux? If so, you're delusional.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: POINT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
POINT
sO, you think more then 10% of those in the USA hack this device so they can USE hacked games?
Thats a real big number.
I wonder if a SERVER can regulate and control a GAME, rather then the CLIENT SIDE.
So, they dont/wont/cant/.. TRY/DO what every other PC game has ever done to control CHEATS?
Or is your complaint that of LOST SALES?
is it a requirement to hack the hardware FIRST? thats a reason to change the OS, many times. Filling HOLES. What if one of those HOLES eliminates the ability to play 10-20% of games created for this device?
I will think that you are a person that lets MS install anything on your computer, you even goto their site and load up there small gadgets/games..did you know that a few of those games are virus'd??
According to Sony/MS you have NO RIGHT to install any software not SOLD by sony/ms. did you know that is against the law? If someone makes software to WORK on the device, they have no protection. THE ONLY protection they have is your console. and they CAN change that, and RESTRICT any 3rd party use.
Do they have the RIGHT to restrict your USE? NO.
Do they go out and kill off sites that GIVE ROMS of their games? not really.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ALSO
the article is:
"Hackers Claim They Can Unban Banned PS3s While Banning Unmodded PS3s"
Its about MODDED PS3's..hacked hardware. and that is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
More if I create an alternative network and start taking clients from them it is their problem not mine or anyone else.
If I paid for it, I don't want them telling me how I should use it or not, it is not their business and it is not yours also.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I don't know much about it
Their master keys are exposed, they can only play catch up from here on.
and the other option is to keep the otherOS, shield from updates, and continue your dis-assembly work.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have a problem here.
If I lease/rent a product, Who is responsible for repairs/maintenance/oil changes? Not myself.
Who here would be considered a PIRATE, or installing an After market product on/in a car? Anyone here install a Phone/ipod charger in a car?
HOW do you think our mechanics got a start? Learn from playing around with a car. BUILDING a car. Fixing an engine...
For you modders and hackers, how many times have you had to AUGMENT your computer? How many times have you NEEDED a person to kill those virus's? FIX a power supply? NEW video card??
IF' you really want a suggestion, read up on the Lawsuit between Atari and Activision, from long ago, on the Atari 2600. Then think about 1 strange thing. MS/APPLE are going in the same direction. They DONT want games on your computer. they are trying to Force you to CONSOLES. Yes, its a conspiracy. But, at the price of consoles, you could CREATE a computer for only GAMES, and run about 60-80% of ALL the games with an emulator.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I have a problem here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I have a problem here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I have a problem here.
Jail broken is HACKED/modded..
They wanted a feature that was ALREADY THERE.
Just as you have the right to tell WINDOWS, NOT to auto update.
Go look up the law suit of Atari/activision..its on the wiki.
Sony/MS want to LOCK DOWN THE CONSOLE. anything done to it, is THEIR own creation. They do not want Anyone or company, to modify it..PERIOD.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I have a problem here.
Do not try to claim ownership on what I legally paid.
I will do whatever I want with that crap and there is no law that will stop me from doing so and I dare any MF try to do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Reality check
Nice way of destroying any reasonable debate.
Your "talk" reminds me of the abortion debate. How do you suddenly turn everything around to make the "other side" look like terrible monsters?
Easy: Call one side "Pro-Life", and the other side "Pro-Choice". It's impossible to choose a side, because the implication is that you are either a murderer or a fascist.
End result: People shut up, they are too afraid to take sides and become much easier to manipulate. Mission accomplished.
Work both sides for your agenda.
The point is words like hacker and Corperate G-man is nobody remembers the days of MPlayer or Gamespy and the networks before proprietary crap like PS3Net or B.net or XboxLive. Seeing it yet? Yeah its pretty simple. Dont use the net that's free you must pay us, be monitored by us, or ELSE.
OH and I do remember MPlayer & GameSpy quite well.. the reporting feature WORKED. Ban the Cheater not the people who want more functionality out of there gaming computer (aren't euphemisms fun?).
Wake up people!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hmmmm
As long as there is a way to ban user IDs from a server, cheating is NEVER a problem for more than a minute or two. Just because someone modded their PS3 doesnt mean they will cheat.
Unless its easy to make a new ID (I dont own a PS3, sony can kiss my...) in which case, a new system would have to be created, such as the ability to ban an IP (or console ID, if it exists) from a server.
Nonetheless, I am 19 and I just thought of 3 ways it could have been done without banning the entire console.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hmmmm
The problem is NOT the cheater. its the person that wants to use MORE features NOT available.. Or make something BETTER..
As in using the unit as a media player, or install Linux and have MORE options, then JUST SONY/MS-XBOX..
If the corp thinks you changed the BOX, they can Turn it OFF, and you will have NO ACCESS. just a dead box.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hmmmm
Also, the ideas you describe would not work. The gamers ID is inherently attached to the IP. Together they make the user profile. The user profile, if banned, bans both the ID and IP. The only way to avoid is to get a new unit and new ID and a seperate connection (new IP). MUCH MUCH easier to just "not cheat" to put it simply.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: hmmmm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Its been coverd...
To ban a cheater from the only thing that makes a system "media" worthy is an obvious control reach. Many systems way before PSN showed that you don't punish the lot because of one kid who does not wipe his feet. My main example is steam...you get pegged for disrupting the out come of a game and they no longer let you play on servers that people care about. A whole realm of other servers exist that don't have such strict environments. simple.
What sony has done is dug a rabbit hole and honestly they are not coming back from it. I have a hard time wanting the system, I just want some of the games it can play...they made it hard to care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
false merketing
Thats AND, not OR"
We have false marketing statutes here in VA for that kind of thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: false merketing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sony in the other hand is far from better, they made a rookit to stop music piracy but they sell mp3 and divx players ...
They were my console choice only for the linux support, I ditched them after the other os removal, linux on the ps3 was the best to help folding@home ...
Sony will never understand that piracy come from hardware hackers that want to use the hardware for some specific uses, that's why the ps3 wasn't pirated before the other OS removal, everyone was happy with the playstation 3 ...
So, I think that Sony will have to try to hide for a long time, they have now have pretty powerful foes everywhere around the world, We will soon see Sony throw the towel with their logs history of visitors of Geohot websites, most of them were coming from the slashdot.org website and are IT professionnals so they will have about thousands of maybe hackers !!!
Sony may die, I won't buy anything from them anymore !!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Canadian stance.
You have bought a unit. It is your unit. Sony has no right to brick your unit for doing what you want with it. If I applied Geohotz mod to run another OS on my ps3, did not do anything to interfere with the psn network (hacking is a criminal offence in Canada). In Canada we are allowed to jailbreak our devices. Why you ask? Because it is our device after we have bought it.
If I put an OS on my ps3 and sony bricked it. I would be dragging their ass into court.
Look at it from the toaster perspective. You buy a nice dew digital toaster. You find out it only can toast bread from one manufacturer and only use power from one supply company. Is this fair. In most of the worlds opinion no its not. If you not careful of the people you back this is the direction the world is headed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I wanted a PS3
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RE: Stop this CRAP
2. Trearing a statment into pieces with technical reteric is side stepping it is what political turds do when they can not answer a statment.
3. Where was all the compaining when sony removed the other OS. The point was to protect there developers from "piracy"
4. "piracy" is a method of stealling. see 2.
5. One person here made a good point. Playing SP can not be done in some gameswith out uppdating. I appologise I forgot they had set that in to motion recently do to piracy.
6. I am not the Morrale police but defending haveing the abblity to rip someone off is pretty freaking low. Someof you deserve to dowload the CFW and have it blow up in your PS3 gose up in flames or you just get your money ripped off by the designer of the CFW.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why
Sony sold a product with certain features then disabled those features. Would seem logical if the purchaser paid for those features they have the right to access them or Sony owes a lot of people refunds and now that LG is suing Sony over the PS3 it's likely they're gonna have to fork out some big bucks to LG. In the end - DON'T BUY SONY.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Enforcing Policy on PS Network
If Sony & the LAW chose to see the PS3 not solely as hardware product, but as some convoluted security device or dongle for their Gaming Business. Then its Sony's negligence and their responsibility. If they had forced a USER Accept policy that was locked to ON CHIP ID or HARDWARE, as some unique encrypted identifiers implemented in security dongles like corporate VPN's, silly things like this wouldn't happen. What were they thinking, this is the internet. The PRIVATE NETWORK SERVICE is the future for them and other companies with regards revenue and if they wish to be taken serious, then they better start with good security policy and administration. Whilst your at it, you may wish to put SONY'S ruling elite through a refresher course.
Lets be honest, this can't be about cheating or bootlegging since this activity has existed since day 1 and across ALL platforms. Sounds like a convenient convincing excuse though. People who harp on about ALL those users with the original OtherOS option activated being less than honorable are a little short sighted. Cynicism is no justification for a legal precedence. Remember it was sold with this and many who bought this when released did so, BECAUSE it was the cheapest way to get a BLU-RAY DRIVE! I know of lots of people who did not buy this primarily for games.
Anyhow, the legal end game here is if you bend a little they'll take miles. You only need look Sony's history to see they've been less than generous over the decades as a corporate citizen. Which is a shame, because they have a lot of good talented people working for them. It would seem their ruling elite have not evolved past the 1980's, and I think I'm being generous.
Some posters on this forum highly critical of Mike's controversial use of headlines forget, he is paid to invoke debate and discourse. Get over it, don't make it personal its a forum.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hello, I am Max
[ link to this | view in chronology ]