The 'Stolen' Scream: Photographer Discovers His Image Is Everywhere... And Embraces It

from the how-to-do-it dept

Wed, Mar 9th 2011 11:41am — Mike Masnick

loricnet points us to the wonderful story at F-Stoppers called "The Stolen Scream." It's done as a video, which you can watch below: It's about a photographer Noam Galai, who had posted a photo of himself screaming on Flickr. A few years later, he discovered, much to his own surprise, that the photo was being used all over the place. The photo is on t-shirts, in magazines, on book covers and a variety of other places. But rather than freak out and go ballistic (or legalistic) about it, he went a different route. He embraced it. He started posting an archive of everywhere that he'd seen his own face appear -- including as a symbol in the Iranian protests against the government. And then others came and saw the archive and sent in more examples they had seen. So now, he's set up an entire website, TheStolenScream.com, a blog of all the uses of his image he finds... and (quite smartly) his own store to sell things with the image printed on it.

David Bergman, from F-Stoppers, points out that his first reaction, like many he spoke to, upon hearing this story was to wonder if he was suing anyone, or if he was trying to protect his works. He even notes that he "couldn't understand" why Noam didn't seem particularly upset about all of this. And, eventually, he came around to realizing that maybe this wasn't a bad thing:

There is no way to know for sure but I bet if Noam had watermarked his images from the start, none of this would have happened including the Glimpse Magazine cover. The people that were looking for "free" images online would not have contacted him if his images were watermarked, they would have simply found another image to use. By allowing his images to be public, Noam has gotten to experience something that many artists would give anything for. In my opinion, this experience is worth more than any advertising agency could pay for the image. Noam has made almost no money on these images so far, but I believe the money will come. I know many, if not most of you, will disagree with me but I see Noam's Stolen Scream as an amazing example of art and the power of technology. I believe everything worked out for the best.

Not only that, but I'd bet people are now a lot more willing to buy all that gear from him directly. First, because of the whole "stolen scream" concept, he's getting even more attention, and the image is getting additional attention. On top of that, people now know that they can support the original creator directly, something which often drives people to buy. It's really a great example of how to respond to such a thing. As he says in the video:

This is the thing. Artists like their work to be published and seen by as many people as possible. Usually, when someone paints a nice painting, he wants as many people as possible to see it in museum. I'm not a big fan of people stealing my pictures, but it's better than not having all those people see my pictures at all. It's another way to publish my work. It's not me publishing it, but it's other people publishing my work for me. If I had taken this picture 20 years ago, the only place it would be is in my room and that's all. I don't think anyone would know about this picture.

There's also a funny bit at the end, where he tried to offer the image via a stock image service, and it was rejected, because the stock photography company claimed there wouldn't be any interest in that photograph. As Noam says, "I guess they are wrong."

Of course, we've seen this elsewhere as well, but it's always nice to see yet another example of people realizing that there can be massive benefits to others promoting your work for you. You just have to learn how to embrace it, and set up ways to capture some of that benefit.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copying, noam galai, stolen scream

19 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Killer_Tofu (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 11:49am

Not the big names ..
"This might work out for some no name photographer but this would never work out for a photographer who was already big." [ paraphrased from old school AC's book of Mike is always wrong, Volume 1]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pixelation, 9 Mar 2011 @ 11:51am

Here is someone to support. Well done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jackie, 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:06pm

He has given needed expression to many in the world
I think his image is very powerful and has moved people all over the world. And has allowed them to express something they felt but otherwise had no means of expressing.

Great work!

Recognition is helpful to a good artist and this image has allowed him to begin establishing his career as an artist.

Perhaps, like Banksy, he'll be able to make money with books and his own renditions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jose_X, 9 Mar 2011 @ 6:55pm
  
  Re: He has given needed expression to many in the world
  To start, others are already selling t-shirts and other merchandise, so he need only drop by and ask to trade endorsement of some sort for some change per item.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mojo, 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:17pm

Mike, please keep tabs on this and let's see if he actually does make any money on it.

If he does, a lot of your theories about the new age of copyright and how artists will make money will be proven right.

If he still walks away without a red cent, well... it will simply prove (or at least provide another example) of how if people can get something for free, they just ain't gonna but it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:25pm
  
  Re:
  Mike, please keep tabs on this and let's see if he actually does make any money on it.
  
  He got paid by National Geographic, so he's already in the black.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Marcus Carab (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:25pm
  
  Re:
  If he does, a lot of your theories about the new age of copyright and how artists will make money will be proven right.
  
  Really? There are plenty of other examples of people making money while distributing their work for free, but the pro-IP voices have yet to accept any of those as "proof" or even as "evidence" - they generally just reject them out of hand.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- John Doe, 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:34pm
  
  Re:
  Whether he makes money on this or not, it happened and there was nothing he could do about it. Embracing it is a win for him because he doesn't rack up court costs and lack of sleep fighting every instance of it.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:48pm
  
  Re:
  Mike, please keep tabs on this and let's see if he actually does make any money on it.
  
  I just bought something, so I guess everything this site ever posted is no validated.
  
  Debate ended.
  
  What are you going to blog about next, Mike, baseball or something?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
fogbugzd (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:19pm

>>Artists like their work to be published and seen by as many people as possible.

But their agents and managers are more interested in getting paid. It is usually the middlemen who do the suing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hiiragi Kagami (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:35pm

Content is the advertisement for the product.

Not hard to figure out... for some, anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Greevar (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 12:47pm
  
  Re:
  The product being labor, right?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Marcus Carab (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 1:32pm
    
    Re: Re:
    labor, talent, time, access, exclusivity - anything scarce that can be offered.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - The eejit (profile), 9 Mar 2011 @ 1:59pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Marcus, I think your spleen needs replacing - that'll be $1500. :p
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jose_X, 9 Mar 2011 @ 7:13pm

Not bad for a one-night's stand
Generousity saved the cat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 9 Mar 2011 @ 8:24pm

we are gonna drown in t-shirts and plastic mugs if every lensman adopts this model!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
iveseenitall, 9 Mar 2011 @ 10:26pm

Popularity.
Think of it as a planet where the more popular the artist and artwork are the more advertisers flock to your site.
No mystery to unravel, no privacy to invade because popularity is transparent to all rather than filtered by iron grip institutions.
In such a world any person would be free to fling their creative work into the wind for all to like or not. For any to improve or not.
Artists fighting to be heard not protected or preserved.
Popularity. Follow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Mar 2011 @ 5:55pm

it wasnt stolen, he posted it online, if he wanted to keep it, he never would have put on the internet

no brainer, sue them all for money, making the lawyer rich, or try to cash in on it somehow and hope to make himself some cash

this isnt an example of giving something away for free and making money, he wasnt giving it away and trying to sell tshirts at the same time

after the image became popular he is trying to make money, not the same thing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Arena Creative Stock Images (profile), 14 Feb 2012 @ 3:59pm

What a story
I loved this story when I first saw it. The moral of it is, never post anything anywhere (especially high-res, and non watermarked) on a website as public as flickr, unless you want people to take take take until you find find find the photo all over the world.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]