Maintenance Report Shows Radiation Levels On Some TSA Scanners 10 Times Higher Than Promised
from the uh,-whoops dept
At the end of last year, we pointed to some discussions that suggested the TSA was being totally misleading in claiming that the new naked airport scanners had been shown to be totally safe when it came to radiation. While the studies the TSA used to make that claim only said that was the case if the machines were working properly, there was no evidence that the TSA was actually making sure the machines were working properly, or how easily they might not be working properly. Well, it appears that this may have been a much bigger issue than originally thought, as some maintenance on these machines has shown radiation levels 10 times the amount that they're supposed to be emitting. The TSA has now agreed to retest all of the machines -- though it still insists that these new reports were "mathematics mistakes." Uh. Yeah.But, really, the issue goes beyond that. If it's so easy to make "math mistakes," how do we know that the original "lower" reports from these machines was accurate? Assuming these readings were accurate, how long were these machines operating at 10x the radiation levels? How easy was it for the radiation levels to get so high? How will the TSA prevent it from happening again? Honestly, though, the people who should be most upset are the TSA workers who run these machines. It makes you wonder how much radiation they're being exposed to on a daily basis.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rapiscan vowed to redesign its inspection forms and retrain its engineers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
cue class action lawsuit 10 years from now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: cue class action lawsuit 10 years from now
https://www.safetyact.gov/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They hire them using ads on top of pizza boxes.
They told us that theft did not happen with TSA staff, and when caught for the 10th time, they admitted maybe there were some rouge people.
Lets install the pornoscanners on all the doors in DC and make the critters have to walk thru them like the little people. How much you want to be they would be interested in the reports a bit more?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Last time I got rouge was after I played rogue non-stop for an entire weekend. That game is so addictive.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Math mistakes
Rechecking your result would be an additional expense and we all know the TSA is a low-bid organization.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RAD BADGES NOW! would make a great recruiting slogan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Surprise!
Oh, wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The theater seems to work both ways.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I called it first!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I called it first!
http://www.cancer.org/AboutUs/DrLensBlog/post/2009/12/15/CT-Scans-and-Cancer-Risk-Been-Th ere-Done-That.aspx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmm.
...Of course, like in Japan, the issue could rapidly become much worse, and I hope to hell that it doesn't. I just want to be sure that we don't jump to conclusions on this. Yes, the TSA needs to be more transparent about these things, but if someone said they were giving me one daily dose of Vitimin d, and gave me ten, I'd still be in no danger. It's only toxic at much, much higher levels. Gotta have the numbers to know.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm.
That may be true but and since I avoid the whole thing for me it isn't a big deal.
BUT
For someone passing through them multiple times a week or even worse, daily because they travel for work this is downright terrifying.
These machines have the potential to cause damage even if used properly. TSA has yet to demonstrate they can operate anything properly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm.
Hello Mr. TSA agent i would like my daily dose of potentially cancer inducting radiation please, and a double shot for my pregnant wife please she is radiating for two you know. Oh? I got ten times my daily does thank you ten times sir and my unborn child thanks you ten times as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmm.
Now, where have I heard similar apologetics before? Wait, let me guess, you used to be an apologist for the tobacco industry too, right?
"We can't conclude that smoking comes anywhere close to harmful. Anecdotal observations that seem to suggest otherwise are just coincidental correlations and do not prove causation. Smoking is perfectly safe. If it is ever prov
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TSA workers don't actually know
By the way, I have been part of the design and engineering team for a CT scanner, and "measuring emitted radiation" turns out to be a far more difficult problem than it might at first seem, doubly so when we leave the realm of "testing on the factory floor" and enter the realm of "testing at an installation 2000 miles away and 4 years later". We put enormous effort into this, as did every other maker, in our attempts to ensure that the machines were not only safe when they went out the door, but stayed safe when used in the field, even when used outside recommended operating procedures. But it's a very hard problem under the best of circumstances, and those are NOT the circumstances we are seeing with the TSA's scanners.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
radiation doses work both ways
Personally, I hope all those TSA morons are getting fatal doses. Serves them right!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh... they knew about the radiation...
"Now that your PornoScan (PS) is fully assembled, it's time to familiarize yourself with the control panel. Let's take a look at the four (4) status lights:
"Power" - When power is on, this button will glow bright green. Due to improperly isolated isotopes, this light will also glow bright green when the device is off. A replacement containment device is on the way. Allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.
Note: The PS puts out a shitload (metric) of radiation when fully powered. Please maintain a distance of 15-20 feet when "Power" button is lit.
"Standby Power" - A "power saving" setting. This will allow the device to quickly "boot up" upon passenger entry. This light will glow red when activated.
Note: This lower setting should allow you to come safely within 10 feet of the device. Be prepared to run 5-10 feet in under 0.2 seconds should a passenger enter the device thereby returning it to full power.
"Standby" - Pretty much what passes for "Off" these days. Can still render you sterile within a diameter of 5 feet. Should you need to approach the device (for instance, to power up the PornoScan), please ensure your genitalia are covered with your hands and your body turned 30 degrees perpendicular to the egress of the machine. This button will glow orange if activated or if "Power" button is currently green.
"PANIC" - This status light will glow red at all times UNLESS a meltdown or other catastrophic failure is detected by the onboard computer. At that point the light will switch off. DO NOT PANIC. When the PANIC light goes out, a signal is sent to the nearest TSA headquarters. Please remain calm and await further instructions. (Allow 4-6 weeks for signal delivery.)
Note: PANIC indicator light will go out when "Standby Power" is activated. This is a normal control panel function. Do not panic unless instructed otherwise."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
hot legs
Personally, I hope all those TSA morons are getting fatal doses. Serves them right!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: hot legs
Or at least sterilized. We don't need them making more of the kind of people that would do this to their fellow human beings.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: hot legs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.gammascout.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The TSA needs to come clean with the numbers. I too, suspect that it won't, and more alarmingly, I suspect that the reason that it's not doing so is that it would have to admit some pretty serious mistakes, and no arm of our government readily does that.
So yes, anonymously argue on the internet, but my point (had you bothered actually thinking about it) is that when we throw up our hands and panic about a number that is ten times another number, we are being hysterical until such time as we know both what the numbers are, and what they mean. Expressing concern over a safety issue is one thing. Acting as if we know that there is a cover-up of eminent danger is another. Show me that the TSA is knowingly hiding evidence of harmful radiation exposure, and I'll be the first one at the barricades.
Tobacco companies, as with everyone else, knew for decades that their products were harming and killing. We don't know that about these machines, but hell, I'll opt for the pat down anyway, because I *don't* know - not because I *do.*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Show me the evidence for that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Department Homeland Security and Police intend to use hundreds of new X-ray Back Scatter Vans and other scanners with long-distance capability to secretly scan and search lawful persons� bodies�when driving, walking and X-ray Citizens in their homes. DHS plans to mount X-ray scanners on buildings and utility poles to monitor groups of pedestrians. Citizens that drive or walk to work or lunch in monitored areas may be radiated several times a day.
There is nothing to stop government agencies and police repeatedly targeting (persons of interest) on the street and in their homes with X-ray scans that may cause cancer or induce other medical problems�including individuals afflicted by poor health. DHS new scanning will record eye and facial features of pedestrians, so subjects can be identified for covert X-ray scanning. Consequently some Americans may be X-ray scanned every time they set foot on the street.
How could anyone prove his or her cancer was caused by repeated government X-ray scans? Can you think of one U.S. Government agency you would trust to limit the number of times and duration secret Government scanners can penetrate a person�s body with X-ray radiation, when walking, driving; inside their home? Citizens driving or walking to work, that must pass DHS X-ray scanners on buildings and utility poles, could be exposed to radiation several times a day. The press recently reported that X-ray scanners now used at airports are 10-times greater that what U.S. Government told the American People.
Currently Citizens can purchase small sensitive radiation detectors on key chains that set off different sounding alarms for each radiation level detected. Key Chain radiation detectors sell for about $160.00 and some appear capable of detecting government X-ray scanners penetrating their home, or their body when walking or vehicle when driving. It should be expected more pedestrians might start carrying radiation key chain detectors to learn if X-ray scanners on buildings and utility poles are targeting their neighborhood, the streets they drive or walk. Radiated pedestrians and drivers should protest, especially if they are being hit everyday with X-ray scanners.
The U.S. can�t become a total Police State until the 4th Amendment is either terminated or so watered down it has no legal effect. That will be the result if government / police are allowed (without probable cause or warrants) to expose the public to covert X-ray scans and scans at airports; train and bus stops and other check points.
One can�t help wonder if today�s outspoken Americans that lawfully defend the Constitution, e.g., writers and bloggers will be deemed combatants by U.S. Government; constantly stopped, searched, and questioned by TSA and police; forced to endure no warrant searches of their car, body and forced cancer causing X-ray scans. The Nazi Military and Police repeatedly searched and delayed Citizens labeled politically undesirable boarding trains and buses and driving to work to cause targeted Citizens to lose their jobs. Citizens were placed on (Nazi do not hire lists) similar to the lists U.S. Homeland Security started in 2010.
See: TSA, DHS plan massive rollout of mobile surveillance vans with long-distance X-ray capability, eye movement tracking and more at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031603_surveillance_police_state.html#ixzz1GGDd24RG
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
radiation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]