NBA Ref Sues Reporter Over Tweet
from the thin-skinned-ref dept
If you're a sports fan, complaining about or criticizing sports officials, referees, umpires, etc. is often a part of the pastime itself. And, of course, some of the complaints are often exaggerated (to say the least). While many refs have learned to be rather stoic in the face of criticism, it appears that NBA ref Bill Spooner is going in a different direction. He's suing a Minnesota Timberwolves beat reporter, Jon Krawczynski, for defamation over a tweet claiming that Spooner had promised to help Minnesota get back two points it may have lost to a bad call. Now, assuming that Spooner made no such statement, this certainly could be defamatory. Whether or not it was actually malicious, or whether or not any actual harm came from it seem like open questions. Instead, all this is doing is drawing that much more attention to the original comments and to Spooner's reaction. Perhaps just staying stoic is a better option.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: basketball, bill spooner, defamation, jon krawczynski, referee, tweets
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seems to me that shutting up isn't a really good option here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Which is odd, because nobody takes NBA Refs seriously.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Now if it was done in an obvious joking manner, which it may have been, then I would probably end up changing my tune on this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
"Ref Bill Spooner told Rambis he'd 'get it back' after a bad call," Krawczynski tweeted. "Then he made an even worse call on Rockets. That's NBA officiating folks."
He has called into question the ref, and the league as a whole. Unless he has absolute proof, he just put his foot in it big time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRyN7naQcM0
ROBBERY I TELL YOU!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The league and whoever represents NBA officials as a group put themselves into question thanks to their support and subsequent reactions to Tim Donaghy.
Beyond, this is supremely stupid because you don't have to look at individual plays or games; this happense ALL THE TIME! They're called make-up calls and you can catch one in just about every single game in the NBA, NFL, and NHL. You may have heard about a recent college game in the Big 10 Tournement when one coach went up to the refs at the half and kept saying "11 to 1, boys. 11 to 1!"
What was he complaining about? His team only shot 1 freethrow while the other team shot 11. His team wasn't getting foul calls.
Want to guess what happened in the second half?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
His credibility is not the only thing that is put into question, but also:
- His genetics (example: comparisons to various animals/animal parts like "Jackass!" or "Dickhead!");
- His nature (example: comparisons to excretions like "you piece of s***");
- The moral integrity of his ancestors (example: "son of a b****", or "b******");
- His moral integrity (example: insinuation of bribery like "they bought the ref!");
- His vision (example: "is the ref blind?!");
- etc,etc,etc.
Not to mention (death) threats or threats of physical violence against him and his family.
So, some hack reporter writing about him in a tweet saying that he might be biased, should probably be the least of his concerns.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tweets
Oh wait....wrong kind of tweet...my bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If those claims are untrue, then responding is certainly appropriate. Perhaps he doesn't have a problem with more people knowing about these allegations. Maybe all it will do is call into question the (questionable) capabilities of this reporter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I watch basketball, but not the NBA. College hoops only and usually only during March Madness.
Filling out my bracket right now as a matter of fact.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
D. Rose, MVP, biznatch....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
:-P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe I'm missing something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]