EU Hires IFPI Lobbyist To Lead On Copyright Issues; How Do You Spell Regulatory Capture?
from the shameful dept
The revolving door between companies and government isn't just a US phenomenon. Over in Europe, the EU Commission has hired one of the recording industry's top lobbyists to head up copyright issues, including the ongoing negotiations over ACTA and IPRED2. Prior to taking this new job Maria Martin-Prat's title was Deputy General Counsel, Director of Legal Policy and Regulatory Affairs at the IFPI. So now she gets to put in place the very one-sided policies that she lobbied for for years. That's what's known as regulatory capture, around these parts. Pretty amazing, really, that the EU would so blatantly abdicate the interests of citizens to a single industry.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: eu, lobbyist, maria martin-prat, regulatory capture
Companies: ifpi
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pirate websites make enough to support the small handfuls of pirates who run them, but it is marginal compared to what the actual content creators make from actually selling the same content.
ISPs would have subscriptions either way, and the costs to them of doing IP lookups is minimal compared to the record breaking and steadily increasing profits they post every year.
Sites with legitimate uses like YouTube have not lost market share as a result of implementing copyright filters and responding to take down requests.
Piracy only helps those who want to see industry destroyed in favor of libertarian fantasy and anarchism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Unrequested assertions without applicable evidence!
More assertions discussing figures without the ledgers to prove them!
Attempted concession speaking like he's talking to eight year olds that just want their lolcats!
Over the top conclusion using political scare words to give it weight!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
*puts up a sign*
Koolaid! One cookie!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
False.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Wait, I thought ISPs were making a living off of piracy? At least, that is your usual claim.
"...and the costs to them of doing IP lookups is minimal compared to the record breaking and steadily increasing profits they post every year."
Oh, that reminds me of Hollywood's record breaking and steadily increasing profits every year. Interesting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You do understand the difference between revenue and profit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ok, you are saying that the pirate sites are making a mere pittance compared to the content owners who are making tons. So why are the content owners so enraged about piracy then? Just being greedy?
ISPs would have subscriptions either way, and the costs to them of doing IP lookups is minimal compared to the record breaking and steadily increasing profits they post every year.
Costs would be minimal you say? I disagree, but for sake of argument let's say that is true - why wouldn't the content rights holder pay for it instead of making the ISP pay? Like you said in your first sentence, they are making money hand over fist, right?
Sites with legitimate uses like YouTube have not lost market share as a result of implementing copyright filters and responding to take down requests.
Probably true, but remember, it's still the content rights owner's responsibility to initiate the take down in the first place, as it should be. YouTube doesn't police for infringing content, they only react when notified by the rights owner via a take down notice as required to keep the their 512 safe harbor status and filter it from that point forward.
Piracy only helps those who want to see industry destroyed in favor of libertarian fantasy and anarchism.
Maybe, but I think the real reason there is copyright infringement in the first place is because it is simply human nature to share with others.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Second I am wondering if there is any undue burdens we can push onto other industries. Actually we can ...
We can get the auto makers to report who is speeding using OnStar and the cars GPS. This way the local authorities can easily monetize speeding tickets with out doing any work themselves.
I wonder if there is an undue burden we can push on the content and copyright types ... hmmm let me think about this for a while.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
WTF???
America was build on top of piracy, piracy was what allowed America to become one of the greatests nations in the world and you want to push back on that great tradition?
If it was not for piracy you probably wouldn't even have an entertainment industry to begin with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Instead you see a very large part of the population that saw the news, just shaking their heads in disbelief.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Ah yes, someone who lobbied for companies who directly profit from stronger copyright is the same as someone who (AFAIK) didn't lobby for any companies at all. I suggest reading up on what regulatory capture is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How Do You Spell Regulatory Capture?
Lobbyist
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The IP Golden Age
I have seen this opinion mirrored in many places. Apparently, the US and other "innovative" countries will design and prototype the worlds products, while other countries will manufacture them. Wow! Aren't we lucky we're a creative and innovative country?
But wait! What's to stop the manufacturing companies from stealing the designs and using them without paying us? We know there's no way that any other country can beat us at smart design innovation, so we need to beef up all intellectual property laws everywhere so that the new Golden Age can occur!
This is great for creatives, but what about all the hard workers? You know, the ones who worked the lines, built the bridges and skyscrapers? What's that name for them, oh yeah, the MIDDLE CLASS? I guess they just need to move to one of the manufacturing countries, because there's no non-creative jobs here! Well, actually, I'll pay you a dollar to mow my lawn, then you can go!
Please, someone tell me I'm being paranoid, and that I should put my tin-foil hat back on and STFU. Please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The IP Golden Age
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
C'mon every time someone gets appointed in a government position it is almost always a woman.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You do realise that not all feminists are women, don't you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Was that intentional? I'm clicking funny anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I had to point to this quote from torrent freak
“Welcome to the European Union, where the big business lobby organizations are calling most of the shots at the Commission, and where citizens are just seen as a nuisance to be ignored. I guess the only real news is that they don’t even bother to try to hide it any more,”"
"I guess the only real news is that they don’t even bother to try to hide it any more" ... This whole we can do anything we want attitude is going to come back and bite them on the ass in short order. This is something that will slowly build to a flash point in the collective consciousness.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I had to point to this quote from torrent freak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Criminals within IFPI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]