Google Found Liable For Autocomplete Suggestions In Italy
from the oh-come-on dept
Here's yet another ridiculously bad ruling for search engines in Italy. Glyn Moody points us to the news of a blog post by a lawyer involved in the case (against Google) who is happy that his side prevailed and that Google is liable for search autocomplete suggestions. The case involved someone who was upset that doing a Google search on his name popped up "con man" ("truffatore") and "fraud" ("truffa") as autocomplete Google search suggestions. We've seen similar cases elsewhere, and France has (most of the time) also ruled against Google.Of course, this is ridiculous for a variety of reasons. Google is not "creating" this content. It's accurately suggesting results based on what users are searching. Clearly, people are searching on this particular individual along with the two terms. That's not Google's fault. Yet Google is liable for it?
One interesting footnote: a part of the reason why the court ruled the way it did was because the court noted that Google already edited autocomplete suggestions for issues related to copyright infringement. Funny. That's exactly the issue we warned about when Google made the silly decision (following pressure from the US government) to start blocking certain keywords from autocomplete. The court seems to see this as proof that Google can and should be responsible for the content in that autocomplete box... Once again, it looks like the company would have been better off not meddling.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: autocomplete, defamation, italy, liability, search
Companies: google
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
how many internet users does italy have? it seems italy [gubbermint] doesn't much care for the US-style internet. how much backlash would it get if american tech companies started packing up out of italy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Without proof, you're just going to have to face facts that people are stupid elsewhere too
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Google, get out of there now, and don't go back till they beg you AND promise full immunity to stupid lawsuits.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google to curate autocomplete results
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google to curate autocomplete results
Typing 32,000 WPM just seems a little fast for most keyboards to survive until lunch time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Italy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Italy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Italy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Autocomplete Masnick
The autocomplete said:
Mike Masnick nine inch nails
Better get a manicure Mike, Google is calling you out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's not accurate
This is wrong. It has merely to do what data is in the vicinity in google's graph. That has not necessarily to do with that what users search. E.g: Have a look at http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/bbf5f39f-12c5-4bf9-a8da-0f27892c3e56.jpg or the more generic http://failblog.org/tag/autocomplete-me/
Nobody searches these things. These are parts of sentences and they are merely associated with each other somehow and then placed behind each other. So it is inaccurate to state that google accuratley predicts that what people search.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It's not accurate
...So it is inaccurate to state that google accuratley predicts that what people search."""
Perhaps I'm missing something. Please point out where anyone said that Google is predicting what people will search on?
However I hope that you're not trying to suggest that Google doesn't "accuratley" know what people *are* searching on when they use Google, because I don't want my brain to 'splode this early in the day.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: It's not accurate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's not accurate
From googles own site explaining autocomplete:
"*All of the predicted queries shown have been typed previously by Google users.* The autocomplete dataset is updated frequently to offer fresh and rising search queries"
They are not "parts of sentences and they are merely associated with each other somehow and then placed behind each other" they actually are things people have typed into their search bar.
source for quote: http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=106230
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: It's not accurate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: It's not accurate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-05/google-said-to-be-possible-target-of-antitrust-probe -after-ita-acquisition.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]