Winklevi Won't Give Up; Appealing The Ruling That They Have To Accept 'Just' $160 Million
from the drop-it,-guys dept
Incredible. After being told to shut up and take their $160 million from Facebook, the Winklevoss twins are apparently still planning to appeal the ruling from the 9th Circuit. They're filing for an en banc hearing (basically asking all of the judges on the court to rehear the case, rather than the typical panel of three). On issues where there is some disagreement among the judges you'll see en banc hearings. Frankly, I'd be pretty surprised if the 9th Circuit is willing to rehear this case. And, at that point, their only resort will be to appeal to the Supreme Court, who I really doubt would find this a pressing matter of Constitutional importance. What's amazing to me is how much these guys seem to be hurting their own reputations here. Seriously, take the $160 million or so and move on.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: appeal, ideas, winklevoss
Companies: connectu, facebook
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The did
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You had a business that failed, you sued a competitor claiming he stole your business idea, rather than take it all the way in court you accepted a cash/share payoff. You cannot go back and say you want more money. Please take the millions you didn't warn through hard work and go spend it on whatever it is that floats your collective boats.
Lot of love,
The Internet xxx
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Winklevi Lawsuit method
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
someone tell me who their lawyer is (sarc)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
facebook was their idea before zuckerburg came along and stole it. they spent hours coming up with and perfecting the perfect model for a social networking service, only to see zuckerburg come along and open a real website and service, without any kind of payment or license to them. the evidence clearly shows that they were talking about starting some kind of social networking service at some point in the future, or they could have sold that idea to a venture capitalist firm, or just held on to it until a more opportune moment. zuckerburgs' actions clearly devalued the market for their idea, and as such they should receive all the moneys earned from facebook, and not just whatever crumbs that idea thief chooses to give them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Umm.. in your own words, they were only talking about it. I can talk about doing something all day/week/month/year/decade/century/millenium/eon/epoch/you get the idea long. If I never DO it, then I have no right to go sue someone that actually does something to make it happen.
If you only talk about doing something, and I come along and actually do it, and then you come trying to take MY earnings.. well, good luck.
Apparently 'actions speak louder than words' is no longer true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/197371/hoverboard_project_takes_flightand_actually_hovers.ht ml
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
My daughters step sister built one of these (see link below) for her science fair project with a leaf blower and you can move people with it!
http://www.hovercrafterz.com/howtobuildahovercraft.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
"He stole our idea!"
This is probably the shortest statement in existence with the most misconceptions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fBook
The fact is Zuckerberg and the Winklevoss Twins, WT, were on a collision course with their ideas. Even if the WT hadn't approached Zuckerberg this suit may very well have happened anyway. The WT should take their 160M and do something constructive rather than beat this dead-horse any longer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: fBook
Just be quiet about it. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm fantasising about a situation where someone would have to say this to me.
*sigh*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]