The Infinite Loop Of Algorithmic Pricing On Amazon... Or How A Book On Flies Cost $23,698,655.93
from the do-they-have-a-kindle-version? dept
Glyn Moody points us to an amusing story by biologist Michael Eisen, about two Amazon book sellers who (it appears) each used algorithmic pricing to set their own prices on books off of what the other one was pricing it at, leading to an ever escalating price on this particular book about flies. It started with someone looking up a copy of the book The Making of a Fly on Amazon to order a copy for Eisen's research lab at Berkeley and noticing the odd pricing on a couple of used books:Amazingly, when I reloaded the page the next day, both priced had gone UP! Each was now nearly $2.8 million. And whereas previously the prices were $400,000 apart, they were now within $5,000 of each other. Now I was intrigued, and I started to follow the page incessantly. By the end of the day the higher priced copy had gone up again. This time to $3,536,675.57. And now a pattern was emerging.In other words, by basing the price on a specific multiple of each other's price, they created something of an infinite loop of automated pricing. Of course, since it only seemed to check once a day, the loop didn't spiral totally out of control (well, depending on your opinion of the value of a book on flies). Apparently, the escalation in price went on for another week and a half or so before someone finally noticed... but not before the book got all the way up to $23,698,655.93:
On the day we discovered the million dollar prices, the copy offered by bordeebook was1.270589 times the price of the copy offered by profnath. And now the bordeebook copy was 1.270589 times profnath again. So clearly at least one of the sellers was setting their price algorithmically in response to changes in the other’s price. I continued to watch carefully and the full pattern emerged.
Once a day profnath set their price to be 0.9983 times bordeebook's price. The prices would remain close for several hours, until bordeebook "noticed" profnath's change and elevated their price to 1.270589 times profnath's higher price. The pattern continued perfectly for the next week.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: algorithms, pricing
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The Real Question is:
Personally, I would try to algorithmically price my book lower if I felt like auto pricing my books, but that has the same risk of spiraling downward to fractions of a cent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
Bordee has 128k lifetime sales \ 4k in the last month
Profnath has 8k life time sales \ 250 in the last month
It seems odd that bordee is even aware of profnath, let alone so adamant about making more money than them that they base an algorithm around them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Real Question is:
Plus wouldn't you think the little guy would be trying to undercut the big guy instead of just barely going over his cost? I would think pricing at 99.1% of bordees prices would be much smarter than .9% over their price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The Real Question is:
As far as why Bordee would try to charge so much more than Profnath, I have no idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
Of course, they obviously didn't think far enough ahead to realize that that extra $2 could turn into millions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Real Question is:
makes sense for the much bigger company, but why would the smaller company do it then. You would think the smaller company would want to be a little cheaper than the bigger company to give people incentive to use them instead of the seller with 100k+ positive reviews.
unless like you said they both hope people equate a higher cost with a better product.
I wonder if this is something with the pricing between these companies on many items or just this one weird case because like I said I am suprised bordee is even aware of pronath.
Maybe they both have an algorithm to drive up price if there is only 1 other seller for an item?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The Real Question is:
so 9.99 instead of 10$
and bordee was 1.2% over their price.
so pronath wanted to be the lowest price but still get as much as possible and bordee (as others have sugested) didnt own the book but would order from pronath and reship(otherwise you would get a pronath invoice and they cant quality check) to you keeping a small profit for doing nothing. Seems like a bad idea as I imagine this strategy could lose them money if its a cheap book, then again the program that does this might not kick in unless the book is over a certain price.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Real Question is:
I can only assume that they assumed Profnath would keep their price low, because any higher than that would start causing the price difference to skyrocket, as it did :).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
The theory is that that seller has a very strong reputation, but doesn't actually have the book. So it hopes that its reputation means people will pay the higher price... and then since it doesn't have the book, it has to buy it from another vendor, and leave enough room for profit, so it algorithmically prices it slightly higher.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Real Question is:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The Real Question is:
So now they've lowered the price dramatically, but after the reduction, Bordeebook still has a used copy listed for $976.98 (at least right now).
--->Meanwhile, over at Borders , you can pick up the book for $67.
Even after this hit the national news media, it seems these guys haven't figured out that customers can price compare on the internet.
At least in the future these sellers may not have to wonder how they developed a strong reputation ... as idiots.
Hint to Bordeebook: There's this thing people call "shopping"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
Or maybe they can pay me to take the book off their hands. I'll take $20,000 and the book please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The Real Question is:
Oftimes their ratings are very high so they count on someone being willing to pay a dollar or two more for the 'security' of getting something from a highly rated seller.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Say it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Say it
*snerk*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Say it
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Say it
$23,698,655.93
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "At least it was only 3.99 to ship"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "At least it was only 3.99 to ship"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
depressing thought
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oddly Enough...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Basically the seller is out of the book but offers it for 1.2% more than someone else who has it with plans to buy the book from them and reship to you?
Seems like this is something you wouldn't want an algorithm to monitor because is the book is 3.99 your only looking a couple cents profit and you will probably lose that reshipping as you would have to express ship it to yourself or the customer to meet expected ship times.
But still a pretty reasonable guess as to what is going on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The most expensive books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The most expensive books
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The most expensive books
The book is over 2000 years old. Yhey're adjusting for inflation on the original price of 3 denarii, 99 as.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The most expensive books
well worth the 900 mil id say, as long as its gently used
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The most expensive books
well worth the 900 mil id say, as long as its gently used
Wow. I actually have a copy of that book on my bookshelf... I think I need to put that up on Amazon quickly. I'll offer it for *half the price* of that other guy and be rich, rich, RICH!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So by default if the first person gets all bought up the person with the higher price wins profit wise. Which actually happens quite frequently when say a professor requires/recommends a book.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Noticed something similar...
... on Amazon (UK, DE, FR, etc. – when I was still making my purchases there: after their trashing of Wikileaks, I've pretty much moved to PriceMinister, which so far I find much more streamlined). Typically: a book from a European publisher, still in print and sold as new for, say, 20 euros, and offered as used by Amazon's "affiliates" in Europe for, say, 8 euros, might be offered, also second-hand, by a US seller for 62.56 US$ or some other ridiculous sum. I used to think that some people didn't quite understand the mechanisms of currency exchange, but apparently it might also be a question of algorithms on the loose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLtnVsDNakI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Look at it and don't buy it - it goes up. A lot.
Doesn't exactly inspire confidence, and if you're not a moron, you can figure this shell game out pretty quickly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Algorithmic Trading
Regards:
Algorithmic Trading
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exmaple amazon's prices changing
[ link to this | view in chronology ]