Movie Studios Got Canadian Police To Arrest Movie Cammers As A Personal Favor
from the disgusting-abuse-of-power dept
You may recall a few years ago when the movie industry went ballistic on Canada, because it didn't have a criminal law against recording movies in theaters. With the way the industry and its supporters were talking about it, you would think that this meant people could record a movie and upload it with no legal problems, but that simply wasn't true. There were still civil laws against such recording, and the industry could enforce those. On top of that, there were still plenty of existing laws against distribution. Yet, there was a big campaign claiming that camcording in Canada was where 40 to 70% of all the leaked movies came from. This number was made up out of thin air, and seemed obviously false when another campaign for similar laws in New York City then claimed that 50% of camcorded movies online came from NYC. Either way, the lies about the numbers were effective. The industry got its law criminalizing recording a movie.We've already discussed the Wikileaks releases on US influence on Canadian copyright law, but TorrentFreak points us to a particularly interesting cable on the subject of camcording in Canada. It kicks off with the embassy admitting that the movie industry was now claiming that perhaps only 18% of camcorded movies came from Montreal, despite an earlier claim that it was 40%. Not surprisingly, the MPAA only made a big stink when it claimed the numbers were in that 40% to 70% range... and was pretty quiet about the revised number.
The cable goes on to note that Canadian law enforcement thought the whole thing was pretty silly, and didn't believe camcording was a big deal. Instead, they (quite reasonably!) felt that their efforts would be better focused on stopping things like counterfeit pharmaceuticals from circulating. Later in the report is the really scary part, where Canadian law enforcement (the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) admitted that a particular individual was arrested twice as a "personal favor" to the movie industry, despite his actions not actually breaking the law:
With regard to the arrest of the individual who had been pursued by the CMPDA, RCMP officers stated that they arrested the individual "as a personal favor" to a [movie industry] official, and that they did not view theater camcording as "a major issue."The TorrentFreak article goes on to note the tragic details of the individual who was arrested -- again, despite not having broken any law, and apparently as a "personal favor" to someone in the movie industry:
The arrest triggered a chain of events which would lead to Adam, who had a history of depression, enduring a 14 month wait for any charges to be brought. He went on the run, was detained and eventually sentenced to jail. Adam began using drugs in jail to cope with his imprisonment and shortly after his release he tragically died of an overdose.Nice "personal favor," huh?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: arrest, camcording, canada, favors, movie industry, rcmp
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
http://www.economist.com/node/16636027
And let's not forget Marc Emery.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overcriminalization
Perhaps it's time to consider a look at our laws, and the effects they have on us.
To have a man in jail for orchids is beyond ludicrous... How the hell is it that we've become such a society of "jail first, question later?"
Should we worry that if we're speeding we'll be arrested on our first offence soon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Overcriminalization
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Overcriminalization
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Overcriminalization
> in our cars all exceed the speed limit.
Inducement to speeding!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Overcriminalization
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...counterfeit pharmaceuticals...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Um, the quote from the report certainly doesn't contain any admission that the guy's actions didn't violate the law.
Also, if the guy did didn't break any law, what was he sentenced to jail for?
Something doesn't add up.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I don't think it's right for police to selectively enforce laws based on personal favors.
I also don't think it's right to mislead and mischaracterize reports of police misconduct (or alleged misconduct...or anything, really).
I think it is useful to call out such mischaracterizations, even if there are several valid points made by the same speaker.
I don't think the validity of the main point of a speaker justifies using deceptive means to support that point.
Does any of that fail to add up to you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
They used the arrest to find another law he broke. Everyone "breaks the law" somehow or another. But the camming itself was not a criminal law issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Where are you getting this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Maybe you're right and the cable is wrong regarding camming being no violation of criminal law, but it would be nice to see some other support for that, since you're link doesn't give such support.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Still, I'm interested to know whether whatever they charged the guy with was related to the original arrest.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Anyway, sounds like they didn't "use the arrest to find another law he broke," but that he actually broke the anti-camming law after it was passed, and was sentenced for that:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2010/03/16/film-pirating-sentencing.html
Of course, relying on news reports for analysis of lawsuits is questionable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I want to know what he was sentenced for. It could be that he was charged with criminal infringement for distributing counterfeit goods, but I don't know. Maybe they found drugs in his house when seizing his cameras... it could be anything. It was a short sentence--two months--so I imagine it was a somewhat "minor" offense as far as prison sentences go. Two months is generally served in a jail.
But you are right, running from the police generally adds several more charges, specifically if he fled jurisdiction and crossed territorial boundaries (although I have no idea of police procedure in Canada, but I imagine it's a little similar to the US)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Of course, it also sounds like he was probably violating the law as it existed previously by distributing the movies he recorded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Anyone else find it incredibly suspect that this guy's drug addiction and subsequent OD is being blamed on a 2 month sentence that wasn't fully served? And he was supposedly addicted to morphine, which I was once prescribed to take constantly for 6 weeks, 4-5 times daily, after surgery. Upon voicing my concern over taking something so heavy for so long, my doctor assured me that a physical morphine addiction takes a looong time to develop.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The notion that the guy "began using drugs in jail" and went strait to morphine is a bit hard to swallow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
I agree we are not getting the full story here. The guy obviously had some issues before he went into jail and to blame this whole thing on the arrests is a bit much. But a guy is dead because he cammed movies, thats sad no matter how you slice it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Not sure if that's a safe conclusion to make.
A guy cammed movies, went to jail, and he is dead. That doesn't mean there's a causal relationship.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It is certainly not an a+b=c situation. But if he wasn't picked up for doing something that is not criminally illegal by the police at the request of industry insiders he would probably not have developed his new found love of morphine. Was it his choice to cam movie and do drugs? certainly. Does it seem he was a little unstable to begin with? The medication mentioned certainly implied it. Would he have been arrested if not for someone calling in personal favors? Probably not.
Is the industry or the "favor caller" directly to blame for his death? no. Did that favor set in motion of chain of events that led to his death? it would seem so.
"But a guy is dead because he cammed movies, thats sad no matter how you slice it." seems to hold up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
First, the article I linked above says he was arrested and sentenced for something that *was* criminally illegal when he did it.
Second, is there really any evidence of this notion that he never tried an opiate before being arrested or sentenced, other than speculation?
Maybe that's true, but I see no reason to believe that's "probably" true. It makes a nice narrative, for sure, but that doesn't make it true.
I still don't see why people are assuming this guy would not have engaged in the same type of drug use had he not gone to jail? Is there some evidence of that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
just the statements his GF made in the torrent freak article.
Though rereading that article it seems to say he only served 7 days of his sentence....seems like he didn't wait long to chase the dragon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Mental addiction is just a deep seeded craving. Often times it will override a persons ability to think logically or rationally in relation to taking the drug but there is no physical dependence.
Morphine(or any opiate) has a very fast rate of mental addiction but a very slow rate of physical addiction.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, besides "lobbying group."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RCMP
-Blew up a building in Alberta to try and "flush out" Weibo Ludwig who they suspected of being an eco-terrorist.
-Claimed that Ian Bush and an officer were struggling for his gun when Ian was shot ... in the _back_ of the head.
-Tasering Robert Dzieka�ski to death.
-Arrested Jason Nixon for killing a horse on the word of a crack addict who was just trying to get the $25K reward. Of course, Jason was eventaully found totally innocent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RCMP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As a Canadian
And I remember feeling surprised, because as a movie buff in all of the 20 years I've been going to the movies in Canada, I don't remember ever seeing anyone pull out a camcorder!
But then the so called "blockbusters" got terrible reviews and completely underperformed in the box office, and that year turned out to be one of the worst years for the movie industry, so they quickly backed off these claims.
Its funny how these things work out, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
canadian police
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
canadian police
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: America
[ link to this | view in chronology ]