European Court Of Human Rights Says Newspapers Don't Need To Pre-Inform Celebrities Of Coverage
from the good-for-them dept
Earlier this year, we wrote about the campaign by Max Mosley to require newspapers to inform celebrities before articles were written about them. This seemed like a pretty big attack on free speech and, thankfully, Europe's Court of Human Rights has now denied Mosley's campaign, saying that it is not a violation of an individual's privacy rights to be written about in the news. This is a victory for supporters of free speech. The court clearly noted that deciding otherwise would have created a true chilling effect on free speech.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: free speech, max mosley, privacy, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Six Principles of Global Manipulation
Six Principles of Global Manipulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fF3TQ0lJnU
and:
Anti-Qur'an Strategy of the Bible Project Wheeler-Dealers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1wXgXwj3MI
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not terribly surprised at this...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They should still inform them anyway...
"Max? Yeah, I've got an unflattering article I'm going to run. Just thought you should know. It should be live any minute now... ah, there it is. Smooches!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ya think?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
a) a vendetta against openness; or
b) stupid people are diiots.
I can't tell which.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
"the News of the World, a British tabloid newspaper, released video footage of Mosley engaged in sado-masochistic sexual acts with five sex workers in a scenario that the paper said involved Nazi role-playing, a situation made more controversial by his father's association with the Nazis"
(His father, Oswald Mosley, created and led the British Union of Fascists in the 1930's)
Source: Wikipedia, take with your daily recommended allowance of salt.
So... yeah
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Perhaps a full page "ad" in a national newspaper/website would inform them that you had a story you wanted to run ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Max Mosley wants more suppression. The rest of us want more news.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]