FCC Commish-Turned-Lobbyist Can't See What All The Controversy Is About

from the tone-deaf-to-the-very-end dept

Fri, May 13th 2011 1:46pm — Mike Masnick

FCC Commissioner Meredith Attwell Baker has been receiving a ton of criticism for taking a high level lobbying job at Comcast just months after approving its huge merger with NBC Universal. The response has been almost universally to condemn Baker in a move that smacks of the corruption of regulatory capture and the revolving door between corporations and the government that regulates them. I had been wondering if all of this publicity would lead to Baker backing down and no longer taking the job (only to take a similar job, more quietly, down the road). But, instead, it looks like she's digging in her heels and insisting that nothing (nothing!) improper is going on here. She claims she hadn't even considered taking a job until months (months!) after the merger was approved:

Until late this spring, my plan was to seek renomination for a second term as Commissioner. That was true all through the winter during consideration of the Comcast/NBCUniversal transaction and in the months after it was completed.

Not once in my entire tenure as a Commissioner had anyone at Comcast or NBCUniversal approached me about potential employment. When this opportunity became available in mid- April, I made a personal decision that I wanted to give it serious consideration.

Nowhere in Baker's statement does she even come close to acknowledging the concerns that people have raised. Instead, she claims that she's been extra ethical in that she's "gone further" than what the law requires:

I have not only complied with the legal and ethical laws, but I also have gone further. I have not participated or voted any item, not just those related to Comcast or NBCUniversal, since entering discussions about an offer of potential employment. Because of this, I plan to depart the Commission as soon as I am able to ensure an orderly wind-down of my office.

Well, isn't that nice.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: fcc, lobbying, meredith attwell baker
Companies: comcast

34 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

The eejit (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 1:16pm

Wow, she really has failed upwards.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Christopher (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 2:07pm

Sorry, lady..... what you did is NOT ethical in the slightest and REEKS of corruption. It's time to admit that and for the government to set aside the decision on the Comcast merger until these questions are answered and they can investigate whether other people might have been as corrupt as you are!

I swear..... it's people like this woman who get me angry at our system of government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Russell B, 13 May 2011 @ 2:10pm

I suppose...
One could say that her actions have been extra-ethical.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- pixelpusher220 (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 2:33pm
  
  Re: I suppose...
  I wonder if these exact words were used by the people convicted in the Air Force tanker contract scandal at Beoing.
  
  She's 'extra' ethical only until it comes out she's not.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - PRMan, 13 May 2011 @ 3:27pm
    
    Re: Re: I suppose...
    I think the grandparent was using "extra" in the sense of "outside of".
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Hephaestus (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 4:49pm
      
      Re: Re: Re: I suppose...
      I can't believe he didn't get that ...
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 2:16pm

"Instead, she claims that she's been extra ethical in that she's "gone further" than what the law requires: "

and that's the problem, the law doesn't require enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Christopher (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 2:23pm
  
  Re:
  True that..... the law should require that when you vote on something that a company is involved in, you are FORBIDDEN from owning stock in that company, taking any gifts from that company, or working for that company for AT LEAST 5 years... better lifetime!
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 2:27pm
    
    Re: Re:
    What if she went and worked for another company and the company ended up buying her company? Would she be forced to resign?
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Ron Rezendes (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 3:45pm
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      Did she take that job knowing of the impending merger?
      
      Did she put forth legislation or make any decisions that would facilitate the merger?
      
      If the answer is "Yes." to either question the the obvious answer would be "Yes, she should resign."
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike42 (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 2:23pm

legal laws
Come on, don't you know that legal, moral and ethical are all the same thing? They just made different words for English majors!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 3:03pm
  
  Re: legal laws
  Sorry, but "legal" and "moral" are most definitely NOT the same thing. It wasn't that long ago, historically, that it was legal to buy/own/sell humans as slaves. Are you willing to argue that because is was legal that is was also moral?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 3:13pm
    
    Re: Re: legal laws
    You need to check your sarcasm meter.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 13 May 2011 @ 4:15pm
    
    Re: Moral To Own Slaves?
    The Christian Bible seems to see it as a moral act.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Your Friendly Neighborhood Librarian, 13 May 2011 @ 2:48pm

Keeping up appearances
I have worked in government in various capacities, and I have always understood clearly that I must avoid even the APPEARANCE of impropriety. This goes far beyond appearances...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 4:25pm
  
  Re: Keeping up appearances
  I work for a company who does a lot of work with the US Government and every year we must complete ethics training. They very deffinitly drill home the idea that even if an action is legal but the appearance of that action might be interpreted as unethical, then that action is a serious offence against the companies ethical standards and is subject to dicipline. That such a high ranking official in the government does not grasp that concept is.... suspicious?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Hephaestus (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 4:57pm
    
    Re: Re: Keeping up appearances
    "That such a high ranking official in the government does not grasp that concept"
    
    If you have dealt with any politician recently they are slightly off their nut. It's like the party is about to end and they are getting frantic because there is nothing they can do about it. It reminds me of the fall of Rome in some ways. I am waiting for the offical white house orgy invite to leak ending in B.Y.O.S. (Bring Your Own Sheep).
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 2:55pm

They never once offered me a job, until they did and I took it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 2:55pm

Why would this happen if legit
If I was Comcast and I had a FCC commissioner who saw things my way, I wouldn't be offering her jobs to take her away from that position.

Isn't an FCC commisioner in your corner more valuable to Comcast than having another lobbyist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Aerilus, 13 May 2011 @ 11:17pm
  
  Re: Why would this happen if legit
  well if i were an fcc commissioner in comcast pocket and I knew that they really wanted somehting bad i would make them pull me out of my precarious corrupted position and give me a nice cushy desk job with an air tight contract and if comcast has ever wanted anything its for this merger to go through
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 14 May 2011 @ 10:56pm
  
  Re: Why would this happen if legit
  Well, perhaps, if it wasn't likely that her successor will be exactly the same.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Josh in CharlotteNC (profile), 16 May 2011 @ 7:10am
  
  Re: Why would this happen if legit
  You gotta think long term. The next commissioner will be just as easily bought. And after spending a few years "working in business" they can get this one elected to just make the laws instead of (not)enforcing them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 3:06pm

Complaint: "Even if you're being honest, your behavior has the appearance of corruption."

Response: "But I'm being really, really honest!"

If only self-awareness was something you could inject, like insulin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 3:14pm
  
  Re:
  "I'm honest, trust me."
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Hephaestus (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 4:59pm
    
    Re: Re:
    but ... but ... the cherry tree
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 3:46pm

and that government of the CORPORATIONS, by the CORPORATIONS, for the CORPORATIONS, shall not perish from the earth.

I'll scratch your back and you scratch mine. But I'll be extra ethical about it!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 4:12pm

She Knows
She is fully aware of the revolving door and the connection to corruption. She is highly intelligent and ruthless. She decided long ago that she would engage in corrupt behavior. She is lying very cleverly and deliberately about the course of events leading up to her appointment. She is in trouble and she knows it. She is now trying to lie her way out of trouble. Do not buy it, people.

She knows what she is doing and the directors of Comcast are fully-aware co-conspirators.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 14 May 2011 @ 12:28am
  
  Re: She Knows
  I wonder if people could get slapped with "perverting the course of justice" charges for doing things like that. Because if they can't, you done fucked up.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Capitalist Lion Tamer (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 4:35pm

Thanks for doing that, at the very least...
"Because of this, I plan to depart the Commission as soon as I am able to ensure an orderly wind-down of my office.

Will said "wind-down" include instructions on how to project a "deer-in-the-headlights" sort of innocent naivete? Or is that just something the incoming appointee will have to practice in front of the mirror during his or her downtime?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 May 2011 @ 6:28pm

I have not only complied with the legal and ethical laws, but I also have gone further. I have not participated or voted any item, not just those related to Comcast or NBCUniversal, since entering discussions about an offer of potential employment.

So, in other words, she has been neglecting her duties as a Commissioner in their entirety. Yet despite not doing her job "since entering discussions," she's presumably still been accepting her paychecks. Now that's what I call ethical behavior!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Thomas (profile), 13 May 2011 @ 6:45pm

politicians..
are very good at covering their own misdeeds. Personally I think she's simply another opportunist, making the right votes then getting cushy job outside. Any politician knows how to come up with excuses for anything, up to and including murder.

It's even working the other way; the RIAA/MPAA attorneys are now working for the DOJ, which to me sounds like hiring foxes to keep order in the henhouse. Sometimes I wonder if the DOJ attorneys from the RIAA/MPAA still receive checks that are not from the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aerilus, 13 May 2011 @ 11:13pm

What?
"I have not participated or voted any item, not just those related to Comcast or NBCUniversal"

wait so why she is flushing out her cushy new job in the private sector she is wasting tax payer money by not fulfilling the job she is getting payed to do at the fcc. I think that perfectly highlight why this is a conflict of interest even in the opposite way of what you might think
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bengie, 14 May 2011 @ 7:10am

umm..
Her allowing the merger was in itself corruption, yet alone her taking a job with them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mary Craig, 14 May 2011 @ 3:00pm

Obligatory quote
"It is difficult to get a woman to understand something when her job depends on not understanding it."

Upton Sinclair
[ link to this | view in chronology ]