New Zealand Libraries Considering Shutting Off Public Internet Access To Avoid Three Strikes Law
from the nicely-done dept
We already saw just how confused about the basics New Zealand politicians were before rushing through a poorly thought-out, US-driven copyright law change that put in place a "three strikes" provision. And, now, some of the consequences are becoming clear. While various librarians insist they made this issue known to elected officials, the law makes no exception for operations like a library. That is, if three people in a library use the internet connection there for infringing purposes, the entire library may lose its internet access.Thus, in order to preserve internet access for those who work at the library, many New Zealand libraries are considering turning off internet access for the public (via TorrentFreak. This is a ridiculous and unfortunate result, but it's what happens when you have politicians making decisions based on economic and technological cluelessness, driven by specific lobbying interests.
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: libraries, new zealand, three strikes, wifi, wireless
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They knew. The issue is, as the Wikileaks cables show, our government has no intention of letting things like public outcry or technical hurdles get in the way of pleasing the US lobbyists.
The other half couldn't find the "Start" button in Windows XP.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Never heard of the Military Industrial Complex?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: mike allen on May 20th, 2011 @ 12:59am
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100617/0228329860.shtml
"This is a ridiculous and unfortunate result, but it's what happens when you have politicians making decisions based on economic and technological cluelessness, driven by specific lobbying interests."
Unless you happen to agree with those specific lobbying interests, as you clearly indicated that you were in regard to the US ITC !
This is the two faces of Mike !
You play the same game as they do Mike, but you are not nearly as good at it.
So you are a hero if you lobby the US ITC about 'losses from piracy' (a bunch of folks). And that for you is something you keep as a reference to explain your arguments and refer back too.
When you read what the facts are, most (thinking) people can work it out that you are bi-polar, something (anything) is good if it supports your mantra, but that exact same thing (anything) can be bad if it disagrees with your, what I consider to be a very narrow, self centered and biased world view.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
Darryl seems to be insane.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
Seems like Darryl lives in that narrow, self centered and biased world himself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
Please send me a link to a single post, in 13 years, where Mike didn't support:
- More open, more free, more democratic, more universal access to information, connectivity, and the body of human knowledge.
- equal access to government, and equal influence for citizens rich and poor.
Also, for bonus points, please explain to me how the above is a narrow, self-centered world view. If you succeed, then you are not a crazy idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: How bout some consistency Mike ?? Please.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"held hearings" = "Lobbying"
Nothing like putting lipstick on a pig, or a touch of spin doctoring, to fool the blind masses, and get page clicks.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "held hearings" = "Lobbying"
Because jobs! The economy. America! And freedom.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "held hearings" = "Lobbying"
good grief. can't they at least keep their stupid on their own side of the pacific?
freakin' politicians.
worst part is the same government will probably get back in because, gasp, earthquake.
somehow people are too dim to realise that 'oh, there was a big disaster and they didn't screw up following the preexisting contingency plans and their general massive increase in direct power didn't imeidately cause my house to burn down' is a good reason not to replace them, despite repeated screw ups of this nature (and outright failure to deliver on promisies, lies, general sneakery, and acting against the public interest)
here abouts we have a left wing who screw up due to mistaking the map for the teritory (ideology vs reality) but at least mostly try to do right by the people usualy (with varying degrees of success) and right wing who screw up due to little more than greed and insist on enacting policies that benifit a Very few rich people here and a whole lot of over seas investors/forigen corporations... and no one else. (policies that don't even benifit the former in the long run :S)
wonderful choice really.
(actually, go a little further around the seating layout and you get to some Really interesting nutjobs... and some compleatly inefectual centerists (not that centerists are inherantly ineffectual, just that our centerist parties suck.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "held hearings" = "Lobbying"
Actually, I wish we could ship our stupid out of America to some unwitting country, like say, Canada. It's close and they could all live in Nunavut, and if that's still too far south, keep moving them up to the Queen Elizabeth Islands or Ellesmere Island.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: "held hearings" = "Lobbying"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "held hearings" = "Lobbying"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
New Zealand is a compleatly different country on the other side of the pacific.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And who do you think attempts to write their laws for them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It doesn't break the Internet
I just don't see it.
I just don't get it.
This is one more example of an outcome, that was easily predictable, that results from these insane laws.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would like to clarify something. That sentence:
That is, if three people in a library use the internet connection there for infringing purposes, the entire library may lose its internet access.
Is it really necessary for those three people to infringe using the internet connection or just get ACCUSED of doing so?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
you are correct sir.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Three strikes law strikes right away. Three accusations = click the switch!
So, in real life all that follows "and" in your response asymptotically disappears.
Really sad...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It was only a matter of time.
How's that "encouraging innovation" going for ya, NZ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It was only a matter of time.
(well, ok, that may not be Quite true, but it usually looks like it.)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]