So Much Fuss Over A Photo That The Photographer Has No Problem With People Copying

Polish Prime Minister Says Things Funded With Public Money Should Be In The Public Domain

from the wow dept

Wed, Jun 1st 2011 1:14am — Mike Masnick

Slashdot points us to a report that Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has declared that anything funded with public money will be in the public domain (Google translation from the original Polish). It sounds like there was some hedging on this, as he perhaps suggests that they still need to classify what exactly will be public, but it's encouraging. It's also not entirely clear from the report if this just refers to state documents, or also the output of research funded by the state. Hopefully we'll get some clarification soon.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, poland, public domain

13 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Di Fiasco (profile), 1 Jun 2011 @ 1:19am

So we can expect all technical and software data on the Airbus A380 Superjumbo to be made available, for free, to all?

Cool. I'm starting up my own aircraft manufacturing firm. Who's with me???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 2:44am
  
  Re:
  I'm with you, as long as you are providing the funding to make that Airbus. Don't worry, we should be able to have a running prototype in about a year for less than a Billion � (a real bargain).
  
  Of course our product would be obsolete by then, because the "others" wouldn't just sit still. But it's all free right? So we're good (well, I would be. You would just be about a Billion � lighter.).
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 1:26am

re Airbus A380 Superjumbo not a bad idea.
it would probably take a decade to get ready to make one so airbus would stay ahead of the game - unless they wanted to waste their time and energy going to court - i think that a good idea mr AC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Di Fiasco (profile), 1 Jun 2011 @ 5:37am
  
  Re: re Airbus A380 Superjumbo not a bad idea.
  That's ok - we could just steal their new schematics as they appear and sell them to Embraer to pay for our own manufacturing costs.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 2:54am

Sounds about right. Taxpayers are paying for the works anyway, so they should be able to freely access them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-, 1 Jun 2011 @ 3:02am

It's yet not fully what will be considered public information, but the talk was about openness other government related bodies, no word about patents and such.

Full recording of the meeting (in Polish):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3f8nLz94oQ8
The quote starts at 24:47
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 3:04am
  
  Re:
  Sorry, one edition was unfinished, the first sentence was supposed to be:
  It's yet not fully what will be considered public information, but the talk was about openness of government and other related bodies, no word about patents and such.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 5:00am

I've always believed drug research done with federal money should be benefitting the public more. At some point a corporation locks up the drug that results without repaying the public coffers for the research that lead to the result.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
jweb (profile), 1 Jun 2011 @ 5:24am

hmm.. about those bail out funds..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Beta (profile), 1 Jun 2011 @ 6:12am

let us not forget
How about applying this to publicly funded art?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
-, 1 Jun 2011 @ 6:52am

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikisource/en/wiki/Polish_Copyright_Law_from_4_February_1994

"The copyright shall not cover:
(...)
2) official documents, materials, logos and symbols
(...)"
Yes, art is no different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2011 @ 7:10am

Yup!
And if they don't like it, they can fund their own research.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
weneedhelp (profile), 1 Jun 2011 @ 8:29am

Gasp!!!
You mean give the people what they paid for? But but but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]