Locked Up Technology Is Broken Technology
from the broken dept
This comic was inspired by Sony, but they’re not exceptional. It’s also my first animated GIF Mimi & Eunice. Gear animation modified from Wikimedia Commons.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: drm, locked up technology
Companies: sony
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
good un
too true!!
too bad!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Having it locked for X period of time (reasonable one) is a good thing. Not to prevent anyone else from "fixing" it, but to give the builder a head start and keep his technology (to a certain extent) for that time period.
So great example, however lots of exeptions where your example is fatally flawed. I lol'ed nonetheless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Your shining example on how Nina's point is flawed is nothing but a steaming pile of delusional thinking. Do you always dismiss facts that conflict with your ideals and make up things that support them? I think you do. Do you realize how stupid you look? Are you Glenn Beck?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Just like with an iPhone. I don't want a walled garden, so I go to any one of the other smartphone manufacturers. Apple loses one of my sales, they lose enough and shareholders get pissy.
Stop getting angry and just let the market take care of this issue?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
The global market is not a true free-market. Else patents would not exist, and neither would copyrights, as in a true free-market, they wouldn't need to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Obviously I'm not suggesting that conflict diamonds aren't an issue, but it is in De Beer's best interest to support Kimberly certification, as it further restricts the supply of diamonds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
You already pay for the service when you bought the 50k$ car. Hello? Anyone home? Have you ever bought a new car?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Have you? Warranties are finite. Not to mention the dealers will use ANY excuse to claim it's been voided.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
True, I've never bought a Porsche, but I somehow doubt these magical warranties exist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
As stated earlier, a standard 3-5 year warranty applies. However, for those years, only a certified Porsche mechanic can do the work. There will be no fees for said work as long as it's under warranty, like any car dealership.
Porsche have an amazing warranty (they will even bring you a loaner if the car refuses to start) but still, common car makers are the same. In many countries. I guess the USA is different. If you're paying for your oil change, you're getting ripped off. That was the entire point. The end user is not allowed to modify it as long as it's under warranty.
I have no clue how you ended up talking about magical warranties, but nice spin.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Because you brought it up:
"You already pay for the service when you bought the 50k$ car."
Unless you get infinite warranties for the car, no you didn't. You paid for a limited number of services for a limited amount of time. After that you have to pay - BUT THE CAR IS STILL LOCKED DOWN.
That's the entire point here. The technology is locked down so that only a limited number of people can service it. Those people will charge a premium. Thanks to the amount of computer equipment in modern cars, you risk falling foul of the DMCA et al if you try to modify the car to allow you to service it. Nobody else is allowed to offer a better service if they can, and nobody is allowed to legally service it if the manufacturer goes out of business. That's not right.
"The end user is not allowed to modify it as long as it's under warranty."
Except, this should not be legally enforceable, which is the direction it's headed in. I should be free to modify and change any piece of equipment I own, without legal risk. If I lose my warranty in the meantime, that's a private issue between me and the issuer of the warranty.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Oh and who looks stupid? The person that has legit points, or the idiot insulting him with no arguments whatsoever?
Now go back to trolling. It's better for everyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
And and FYI, Porsche will NOT charge your for the maintenance the dumbass garage you'll go to will. So yeah. Research is your friend. Your brain is not. Buy a new one. They're on sale @ Newegg.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
But how can that be, how can there be a garage that is able to repair this so called "locked up" technology ?
Someone here is a dumbass !!
I can see all you do is insult people. What a retard
Pot calling kettle !!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
As for not having valid arguments, they are quite valid if the dealer charges for servicing the car.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Do you realize how stupid you look ?
If you honestly believe manufacturers design their products to make it hard to maintain you have rocks in your head.
Or if you believe that cars for example, are made to be hard to pull apart and hard for someone to perform their own maintenance, then you have NEVER performed ANY maintenance of a car.
Or you are a complete clutz.
designing any car that is easy to build (and they ALL ARE) then by definition they are equally easy to pull apart.
Again, clearly you are the type of person who simply has no clue about reality.
And zero mechanic aptitude.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Do you realize how stupid you look ?
Also: You are an idiot.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
According to Sony, I am. And they STILL owe me money for the new drive.
;-]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
LOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cant be fixed !!! yea right.
WITH NEVER A PROBLEM !
I guess that is just the difference between reality and Nina.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"NO ONE CAN FIX IT"
NO ONE CAN BREAK IT
It can be fixed, but it cannot be fixed by someone without the skills and correct tools to effect the fix.
If it is not fixed by a suitabilly qualified and certified person using the correct techniques and tools, and following the exact set out proceedures then no matter how it works after the "repair" it is NOT fixed, or in a servicable condition.
That is just reality, its just the way it is, it stops things from being "fixed" by someone who will do more damage than good, and make the equipment useless at best, and dangerous at worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "NO ONE CAN FIX IT"
See, that's the thing darryl - the law shouldn't legislate good decision-making. If I buy something, I own it. It's mine. I should be free to take it to anyone for repair: a certified pro, an amateur, my friend the hobbyist, or my own workbench for some tinkering. They may not always be good ideas but they shouldn't be illegal ideas.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "NO ONE CAN FIX IT"
Regardless, keeping up with the car example, you do own it once you buy it. You can rip it apart and build it back up. Just don't expect them to honor any sort of warranty if you don't follow their rules. After all, they're the ones selling it to you. If you're not happy, you're free to go make bad decisions with another company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "NO ONE CAN FIX IT"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "NO ONE CAN FIX IT"
So anyone can say, tune the computer controlled fuel injectors of many modern cars when there's a problem? Nope. Need a special tool to interface with the onboard computer, and its encrypted and won't respond unless it gets the right response.
You remember back when Toyotas were having issues with the brakes and accelerators? Would it surprise you that there was only one single diagnosing machine in the entire US that could read what the data recorder said?
So why aren't tools that can read that stuff available? The manufacturers won't sell them publicly. Anyone else who tries making and supplying them gets slapped with a DMCA anti-circumvention copyright lawsuit.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pathetic
Dude, can you get more delusional?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]