Malaysian Man Required To 'Retract' Defamatory Tweet 100 Times On Twitter; Streisanding The Whole Thing

from the twitter-is-the-new-blackboard dept

The folks over at OnTheMedia point us to a bizarre story in Malaysia where a man was accused of defaming a publishing company on Twitter. The guy, Fahmi Fadzil, had tweeted back in January that a friend of his, who was pregnant at the time, was being mistreated by her employer, Female Magazine (owned by Blu Inc. Media). To atone for the "defamation," as part of the settlement he worked out, he's required to tweet an apology 100 times, like a child writing punishment on a chalkboard. You can see the first such tweet here:
If you can't see that image, the text reads:
1/100 I've DEFAMED Blu Inc Media & Female Magazine. My tweets on their HR Policies are untrue. I retract those words & hereby apologize
Of course, the end result isn't too surprising to anyone who understands the internet. The Twitter retraction barrage has, of course, attracted all sorts of additional attention, leading to the creation of a specific hashtag for the situation, #defahmi, and lots of additional Twitter conversation, much of it critical of Blu Inc. and Family Magazine -- including at least one tweet telling people to call the company to complain. It kind of makes you wonder if Fadzil agreed to this "settlement" knowing that it would backfire in a big bad way on Blu.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: defahmi, defamation, fahmi fadzil, family magazine, malaysia, streisand effect, twitter
Companies: blu inc, twitter


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Poster, 2 Jun 2011 @ 12:49pm

    Wow, that's just...stupid.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2011 @ 12:52pm

    Bart Simpson of the modern times!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Aaron Von Gauss (profile), 2 Jun 2011 @ 12:52pm

    Well...

    Free speech and other issues aside, there are a lot of stupid and incorrect things said on the Internet - there is a small, very small, part of me that understands this "solution".

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    ChurchHatesTucker (profile), 2 Jun 2011 @ 12:54pm

    Who is being punished?

    It seems like it's punishing his followers more than anything. I don't get the point here.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Cowardly Anon, 2 Jun 2011 @ 12:59pm

    "It kind of makes you wonder if Fadzil agreed to this "settlement" knowing that it would backfire in a big bad way on Blu."

    I actually thought the exact same thing when I read this news this morning.

    From what I understand, they wanted him to retract the tweet, but he suggested this instead. He must have known that it would turn out in his favor.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous coward, 2 Jun 2011 @ 1:40pm

    So instead of letting a tweet die they press the issue so it becomes a worldwide news story. Brilliant job

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Danny, 2 Jun 2011 @ 1:41pm

    Wow

    So now people who are following his Twitter casting (meaning they have at least some faith in his credibility) are not going to see this apology come up and wonder, "What is he apologizing about?" (assuming they don't already know) and go look up what he said originally.

    I wonder how many people who had never heard of him are going to following him after hearing about this.

    I'm sorry but final score:

    Fahmi Fadzil: 100

    Blue Inc. Media: -(however many people those 100 apolo-tweets draw to Fadzil's feed)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2011 @ 1:56pm

      Re: Wow

      I would say Blu Inc should receive a score of -100 for even allowing such a settlement in the first place.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Jun 2011 @ 2:02pm

    Public Relations

    This is ultimately positive PR for the magazine publisher. Any way you look at it they'll probably still come out ahead.

    It's not like the Streisand effect damaged Streisand's career.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    me, 2 Jun 2011 @ 3:10pm

    streisand

    Oh Brothra . Copy paste anything else Fellas ?:o

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Marcel de Jong (profile), 2 Jun 2011 @ 3:55pm

    For a second I thought that I was at The Onion.

    Is this for real? That's just hilariously stupid!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Matthias, 3 Jun 2011 @ 5:00am

    Be quiet or I will replace you with a very small perl script xD

    #!/usr/bin/perl -w

    use strict;
    use Net::Twitter;

    my $nt = Net::Twitter->new(
    # snipped
    );

    my $appology = 'I\'ve DEFAMED ...';
    for(my $i = 1; $i <= 100; $i++) {
    $nt->update("1/${i} ${appology}");
    }

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Aniel Kerkvliet, 6 May 2012 @ 11:49pm

    more Twitter defamation here

    Hi, I found this a very entertaining article. Recently here in Australia there was a case of defamation on Twitter with the recipient of the comments not only going after the author of the comments, but also after Twitter itself. If you are interested, please read my paper on this case on the 2012 CommUnity online conference on Networks & Communities website here: http://networkconference.netstudies.org/2012/defamation-on-the-internet-under-the-hammer-in-an-austr alian-courtroom/

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.