DailyDirt: The Space Shuttle Era Ends Soon...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
The last space shuttle mission will take place pretty soon, and after that mission, the shuttles are all destined to be stored in museums (and not sent to destroy asteroids headed for Earth). Here are a few more programs for continuing to explore space.- Here's a brief video tribute to the space shuttle program. Disposable space vehicles, FTW? [url]
- Space enthusiasts seem to be looking forward to more deep-space missions now. Settlement missions sound like exciting programs.. for our great-grandkids. [url]
- The European Space Agency is scheduled to have a re-usable autonomous spacecraft in 2013. Robots want to return to Earth, too. [url]
- China has plans for its own space station set for 2020. It'll be a bit smaller than Mir or the ISS, but it's also supposed to be compatible with ISS modules in case other countries ever want to dock with it. [url]
- To discover more links on space exploration, check out what's floating around in StumbleUpon universe. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: space, space shuttle, space stations
Companies: esa, nasa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
So, The ISS Docking Module Specifications ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: So, The ISS Docking Module Specifications ...
China has plans for its own space station set for 2020.
"China has said that its space technology will be compatible with that used in the ISS so that modules from other countries could dock with its station, and it promises that its facility will be able to host experiments from non-Chinese researchers. But the US Congress, fearing industrial espionage, has long opposed any role for China in the ISS. As a result, the Chinese space programme has had no alternative but to "go it alone", says Joan Johnson-Freese, an expert on national security and on China at the US Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island."
The future is finally here. Now we really do need to worry about "Space Pirates (of intellectual property)"!
If the Intellectual Property Police (IPP) accuse China of stealing IP from other countries docked modules more than five times, does that mean China gets banned from outer space?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One thing I don't get is why they didn't construct something in space that would create more internal space like a cube.
Even a rectangular shape could be used to create more space, with the modules as a skeleton for support.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost Vision
I believe that we should have a continued "manned" program, but that really isn't the point. We still could pursue an unmanned program. The point is that the US has lost focus and the will to make the space program a national effort.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lost Vision
I think the sad part of the shuttle program ending is that there is no replacement program ready to go just yet... No one wants to say that an unmanned program will replace manned exploration for the foreseeable future -- but that's the reality.
I'm not so sure that manned spaceflight has much of a return on its investment until we come up with much better launch vehicles that are capable of supporting astronauts in a self-sustaining way. With self-sustaining spacecraft, it won't matter if it takes several years to get to another planet... However, we're a looong way away from creating a mobile artificial biosphere.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Lost Vision
How NASA is recycling urine into drinking water
Used on the ISS for quite some time now:
Raw Video: First 'Recycled' Water on ISS
And today's launch of Atlantis just took this tech with them:
NASA’s Pee Recycling Bag Turns Urine Into a Sports Drink
But like you said it will take time to develop a functional and workable biosphere for longer missions in space, as this video clearly demonstrates:
NASA Urine Test
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:Lost Vision
Really, all we need in space is our brains. Also I suspect a well-cushioned human brain could withstand much greater g-forces without a body.
Remember all the science-fiction predictions from half a century or more ago? What didn’t come true were the ones that required large amounts of (possibly nuclear) power. What we got instead (computers, the Internet, and digital technology generally) were ones that can be run off a household power socket or even just batteries.
I think the future of manned space travel also has to lie in lowering the power requirements.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:Lost Vision
Just wait until it's feasible to build a space elevator...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Space Elevator
Imagine a thin thread stretching up into the sky, with little bug-like robots scuttling up and down it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Space Elevator
In any case, I think a "small" space elevator would suffice -- we'd just have to be patient and send small things up, one at a time, that could be assembled once they broke free from the top... but maybe there's still feasibility problems with that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]