DailyDirt: Beating The System...
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
Who doesn't like a great deal? Every once in a while, a deal that sounds too good to be true, actually pans out. Using bureaucracies to your advantage can be profitable (or just enjoyably satisfying for the vengeful). Here are just a few schemes that folks have (almost) gotten away with.- Adverse Possession is an uncommonly-used section of the legal code -- that's allowed a Texas man to claim ownership of a foreclosed house for just a $16 filing fee. This guy has called "Finder's Keepers!" and needs to squat for 3 years -- unless the HOA figures out a way to evict him. [url]
- The Massachusetts State Lottery has an interesting game called Cash WinFall -- which is exactly that for a few statisticians. Statisticians who can buy over $100,000 in lottery tickets, that is. [url]
- Some people collect pudding (we're looking at you, David Phillips). Others buy dollar coins. Either way, the loopholes that let these people rack up frequent flier mileage are closing. [url]
- Apparently, watching too many cop dramas can give you some interesting ideas for revenge. Justice is also a bit too blind, at times. [url]
- To find some more bizarre/crazy stuff, check out some things that other StumbleUpon users have found. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adverse possession, deals, frequent flier mileage, lottery
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I find it sad even with proof showing her elsewhere, they pursued the case.
Now she uses credit cards everywhere to leave a paper trail.
And the DA who made her mind up because the woman was having business problems.
Innocent until proven guilty definitely did not apply in this case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Adverse Possession
It takes more than just squatting in a house for three years to claim this right.
Texas Civil Practices & Remedies Code Sec.16.021 et seq
Among other things, the possessor must be paying all applicable sales tax, the rightful owner could not have tried to evict the possession, and, oh yeah, the possessor needs some kind of deed or title to show that he thought the property was legally his. And it takes more than three years.
This law has a very good purpose. Presume two home owners have a fence between their properties. They each purchase the properties from prior owners. One now wants to build an extension onto his house. He gets a survey done of the property line. Lo and behold, 20 years before, one of the prior property owners put the fence up 10 feet into the other owners property.
The fence line is the new border between the two properties. They both thought it was, both purchased the properties with the understanding that it was, and both have lived with that understanding.
This law prevents a new owner from coming in and forcing you to demolish that garage, because it happened to be over the line that you thought was the line.
Also, for our Texas freind, there is the equitable doctrine of "Clean hands." he knows it is not his property, and he says he moved in for the purpose of taking the property.
He is also trespassing by the way, and the property owner does not need to be a party.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Adverse Possession
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Adverse Possession
Quote:
Source: http://american-business.org/2734-supreme-court-and-land-law.html
Also you can read in there how Indians lost land by those same rules it was not as you claim something to just normalize titles of land ownership it was an instrument created first to deal with Indian-Americans and then to punish foreigners that owned land and did nothing with it, which later on was translated to be anyone who didn't work the land(i.e. speculators)
There was a time that you couldn't find a jury in America to condemn a squatter not one.
Other sources:
http://www.justia.com/real-estate/docs/adverse-possession.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wi ki/Homestead_Act
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squatting_in_United_States_of_America
http://en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Preemption_Act_of_1841
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homes_Not_Jails
http://en.wikip edia.org/wiki/Take_Back_the_Land
http://squattercity.blogspot.com/
Adverse possession in Texas
http://www.lonestarlandlaw.com/Adverse.html
Quote:
Source: http://www.ntxe-news.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi?archive=41&num=34056
http://law.findlaw .com/state-laws/adverse-possession/texas/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Adverse Possession
See:
Section 16.026 - only needs color of tittle which can be granted by torrens tittles.
Section 16.024
Section 16.025
Section 16.029
Quote:
http://law.findlaw.com/state-laws/adverse-possession/texas/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Adverse Possession
But there's still an outside chance that this guy could actually get the house -- or maybe there's a similar case that isn't getting as much attention.... and some squatters will profit nicely in a few years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Adverse Possession
He could have one claim though, and that is by living in the property and maintaining it, the true owner has to pay him for value added. By maintaining it, he is not allowing it to lose property value and actual value.
But I do not believe, under these circumstances, that he can ever get legal title to the house.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Warped reality.
Unless the squatter is doing something to make the neighbors think he's decreasing their property values, there should not be a problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Adverse Possession
"And the guy is still there and if he reaches 10 years no those things you said there don't matter anymore."
Should read like this:
And the guy is still there. If he reaches 10 years or more none of those things you said there will matter.
Also apparently the owner must initiate the proceedings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]