DailyDirt: Moonshot 2.0
from the urls-we-dig-up dept
It's been a while since anyone has proposed and executed a plan as 'out there' as going to the moon in less than a decade. Sure, we have computers that can beat humans at Go, and we're on the cusp of using CRISPR for some amazing genetic modifications. However, we haven't really been serious about getting people off the planet -- and onto another planet -- for quite some time. Here are just a few moonshot-like projects for getting stuff into space, and perhaps making baby steps toward becoming a Type II civilization.- A California startup, Moon Express, is almost ready to get approval for landing a 20-pound spacecraft on the moon in 2017. This company is navigating both the rocket
scienceengineering challenge AND the daunting regulatory approval process at the same time, and it's also competing in Google's Lunar X Prize contest for $20 million. [url] - A space elevator made from carbon nanotubes (CNTs) might not be practical because CNTs aren't as strong as previously thought. A single flaw in the structure of CNTs can reduce the material's maximum strength, rendering a CNT tether far from ideal for a space elevator. [url]
- If everything goes according to plan, Elon Musk's SpaceX will land human beings on Mars in less than a decade. That's an extremely bold goal that goes well beyond JFK's moonshot in the 1960s -- and regular cargo trips to Mars could happen every couple years or so to prepare for this venture. [url]
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: carbon nanotubes, cnt, manned missions, mars, moonshot, space, space elevator, space exploration
Companies: moon express, spacex
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The carbon nanotube article isn't a big surprise
our current manufacturing technology is incapable of producing defect free carbon nanotubes... Hence the material is unsuitable for building a space elevator.
Frankly a non-issue. Just get the technology better and have QA of the product. When will this happen? I don't have the foggiest. Can imagine the fibers being produced and then being subjected to 80 GPa. Since a flawless fiber could withstand 100 GPa it ought to not break. But a single atom flaw would cause the fiber to fail at 40 GPa. More flaws would result in breaking at even lower tensions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The carbon nanotube article isn't a big surprise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Already there
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Daunting regulatory approval? On the moon?
But once you're in space, I don't think there are any regulations or approvals needed to do stuff on the moon.
Not yet, anyway.
I think there's a UN treaty that says countries are liable for any damages caused by space missions launched from their territory (even if private).
So before a private company can launch, they have to satisfy their government that it's not too risky (or at least buy insurance).
But nobody lives on the moon. Nobody has any legal right to tell you what to do there - if you can mange to get there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Daunting regulatory approval? On the moon?
The future will be awesome.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Daunting regulatory approval? On the moon?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Moon Express
First the article was more upbeat than your summary (the article's title says it all "Actual moon shot mission from Mountain View startup set to be OK'd").
That sounds as if the "daunting regulatory approval process" may not be quite so daunting after all.
However, that said all may not be well be Moon Express.
Why?
Because: "The rocket that Moon Express wants to use hasn't flown yet, either"! It does say, somewhat optimistically, that "the actual mission wouldn't happen until the second half of next year".
However, that may be just a wee bit optimistic. The bizjournal article explains that "[t]he Moon Express lander launch is planned from New Zealand using a 52-foot Electron rocket made by Auckland-based Rocket Lab Ltd."
When I did a Google search I came across this article from May 2, 2015 from spaceflightinsider.com:
http://www.spaceflightinsider.com/missions/commercial/rocket-lab-electron-rut herford-peter-beck-started-first-place/
"The first Electron rocket is supposed to launch this year, and though Beck didn’t have a specific date on hand, he gave 'mid-December' as the current target."
It is now June of 2016. According to this May 2016 twitter posting from a SpaceflightNow journalist the Electron now has a new test date:
https://twitter.com/StephenClark1/status/735173389103423488
"Rocket Lab/Brad Schneider: 1st Electron launch in late summer, First commercial launch in Feb '17. NASA Venture-class mission in June ’17.".
That is, of course, assuming that that "late summer" test actually happens. I point this out because the vagueness of both those dates ("mid-December" and "late summer") suggest that Rocket Lab is largely flying by the seat of its pants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Moon Express
[ link to this | view in chronology ]