Wyden Continues To Press Intelligence Officials About Tracking Americans Under 'Secret' Interpretation Of The Patriot Act
from the you-have-no-privacy dept
Senator Ron Wyden has made it pretty clear, for the past few months, that the federal government is secretly interpreting the PATRIOT Act to mean that it can spy on the location of Americans without a warrant. Wyden, who is likely aware of the interpretation due to his position on the Senate Intelligence Committee, can't say what the interpretation is, but it's become abundantly clear through his questioning. Recently, we noted his questions to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, specifically asking if government agencies "have the authority to collect the geolocation information."And now he's been asking the same basic question, getting even more specific, and confirming what some had suspected all along. The link there is from Julian Sanchez, who was one of the first to piece together the clues and suggest that Wyden was hinting at an interpretation of the PATRIOT Act that let the government feel it could track location info on just about anyone with a mobile phone. Whereas Wyden's previous questions focused generally on collecting location info, in this hearing, Wyden specifically asked if the intelligence community uses "cell site data to track the location of Americans inside the country." At this point, it's kind of ridiculous that the feds don't just come out and admit it. At the hearing Wyden was told that there were "certain circumstances" under which such authority could exist, but that it was "complicated." However, he was promised more details on the circumstances by September. As Sanchez notes:
That means that just about ten years after Congress approved the Patriot Act, a handful of legislators may get the privilege of learning what it does. Ah, democracy.There really are two separate issues here, each of which is disturbing. The first, of course, is the feds possibly believing that they can effectively spy on everyone's location at will. If true, that seems like a gross expansion of the surveillance state. But, perhaps an even bigger issue is that the federal government feels that it can secretly interpret laws with meanings that certainly are not stated explicitly within the law... and can then avoid explaining what its own interpretation is. That's not how a representative and transparent government is supposed to work.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: geolocation, james clapper, mark udall, patriot act, privacy, ron wyden
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sadly, that seems about right for the Patriot Act.
End-Say Elp-Hay
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only this is insanely similar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Senator Ron Wyden
... Seriously it is nice to have a decently intelligent senator ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mobile Phone Tracking
Your choices are, (1) Take out the battery, (2) put the phone in a radio-shielded container, (3) Put the phone far away, (4) Do not own a mobile phone. Just having a landline is pretty good, actually.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mobile Phone Tracking
Landline phones can be listened to while they are on or off hook.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mobile Phone Tracking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Mobile Phone Tracking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Mobile Phone Tracking
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Crystal Ball disappearing act?
I'm hoping this is just some maintenance downtime, but I wanted to check if it was just me...
Even better, I hope we're about to see he long awaited new round of cwf/rtb opions...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Crystal Ball disappearing act?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Crystal Ball disappearing act?
I hope it's maintenance. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We can't let you know how its being abused now, despite our promises that it would never happen because you'd vote us all out!
Quick anyone who dares to question anything happening under this, call them Unamerican and throw them under the bus!
I wonder if we pointed out to the members of Congress that they are not immune to these sorts of things, and LulzSec is working on accessing the logs if they would then pass laws to stop it and destroy the archive to keep themselves from being exposed once again as corrupt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Benjamin Franklin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
~~ Abraham Lincoln
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Those who can not see beyond the end of their nose just assume they would never be lied to about these things.
Those who see the long term issues, are shouted down as unamerican and investigated by grand jury's looking for a way to use the law to silence them.
Sadly it might be time for those who want to do something to cause change to take a page from the Murdoch playbook, and begin full on exposure of each and every little corrupt thing until the American people can no longer just accept it was some wacky "activists" who caught them in an unguarded moment, and that these officials care not about the people who got them there but more about the money that keeps them there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mike's pose of thoughtful ignorance:
At this point, tiptoeing around as if just found out you're being surveilled in every way possible at every moment -- especially by your beloved Google that feeds the gov't -- IS completely ridiculous.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And times like this makes me very frustrated to be one...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's all perfectly logical. The Feds know beyond a shadow of doubt that they CAN spy on everyone's location, because they are doing it. However, they also know they MAY NOT do it because it's unconstitutional. It follows naturally that if they want to continue doing it, they must interpret the law to permit their activity. Finally, they must avoid explaining their interpretation because they know it can't stand up to a challenge.
Obama's complete abandonment of every promise he made on this subject before his election is hardly surprising, as he is after all a politician. What's really surprising to me is that people think he's a Democrat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mendenhall has since deleted his 9/11-related tweet.
WOW
[ link to this | view in chronology ]