Yet Another Judge Rejects Yet Another Righthaven Case
from the and-another-one-down dept
Another day and another loss for Righthaven, as yet another judge (this makes four) says that Righthaven has no standing to bring the suit, because it did not technically hold the copyright, since its agreement with Stephens Media only really transferred the right to sue, rather than any of the listed rights under the Copyright Act. This time it's judge James Mahan, adding to judges Kent Dawson, Roger Hunt and Philip Pro, who have all come to the same conclusion. Mahan, of course, got some attention earlier this year when he was the first to rule in a Righthaven case that reposting a full article could still be fair use. Mahan also rejected Righthaven's attempt to claim that its newly amended agreement with Stephens Media should allow the case to continue, noting that the company wants to change the facts of the case in doing so.That said, Mahan refused to make the dismissal of the case "with prejudice," meaning that Righthaven can (and probably will) refile the lawsuit, using the newly amended agreement to claim standing. Until there are conclusive rulings on that amended agreement, we may have to go through this whole process a few more times before some judge finally tells Righthaven to give up.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, righthaven, standing
Companies: righthaven, stephens media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Djambi, the chocolate icing! Oh-ahahah!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Unfortunately that is not what has happened. I would love one of the judges to slam it as being extortion, or more outcomes like Mahan's fair use ruling, that put some decent restrictions on these types of cases into case law. While losing cases on legal technicalities is preferable to them winning, it doesn't leave any rulings on the actual nature of such cases, or on the copyright laws themselves, as precedent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
*makes popcorn*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With Every Rejection, The Quality Of The Remaining Cases Goes Up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: With Every Rejection, The Quality Of The Remaining Cases Goes Up
Examples?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: With Every Rejection, The Quality Of The Remaining Cases Goes Up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: With Every Rejection, The Quality Of The Remaining Cases Goes Up
[ link to this | view in chronology ]