Newspaper Claims Satirical Blogger Mentioning Its Name Is Trademark Infringement
from the get-better-lawyers dept
Gatehouse Media -- a smaller newspaper chain who actually had done some fairly innovative online things in the past -- has really become rather crazy when it comes to intellectual property lately. First it sued the NY Times for linking to it, then it threatened a forum site for linking to it with headlines and ledes (which most people consider to be fair use). Now it's going even further. Keyop points us to the news that the lawyers for one Gatehouse paper, the Utica Observer Dispatch have threatened a local satirical blogger with trademark infringement claims for the great sin of mentioning the name of the Utica Observer Dispatch.We wish to advise you that the name, "The Observer Dispatch," that you are using is the property of GateHouse Media, protected by trademark and past usage rights. Your use of such name constitutes infringement of GateHouse's rights under federal, state and common law. Our proprietary rights in such name include the right to restrict the use of the name. It is important that we exercise our right to protect our name. Its serves as an important and distinctive representation of the origin of our products as well as the goodwill of GateHouse Media.The blogger, Ray Jadwick, definitely makes fun of the Utica Observer Dispatch on his site, but it certainly doesn't appear to be trademark infringement. Making fun of your paper isn't likely to confuse even a moron in a hurry.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: satire, trademark, utica, utica observer dispatch
Companies: gatehouse media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ironic name, wouldn't you say?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Almost as bad as the Associated Press
Seems to me that this newspaper wouldn't like that if the tables were turned... Why don't we flood them with Cease and Desists from using any of our names... oh the hilarity!! Can you imagine them getting buried by thousands of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Almost as bad as the Associated Press
Seems to me that this newspaper wouldn't like that if the tables were turned... Why don't we flood them with Cease and Desists from using any of our names... oh the hilarity!! Can you imagine them getting buried by thousands of them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
O'rly
Apparently The Observer Dispatch believes that have a trademark on the name, The Observer Dispatch, grants the right for The Observer Dispatch to have complete control of all uses of the name The Observer Dispatch. They appear to believe that any use of The Observer Dispatch that is not officially approved by The Observer Dispatch violates their trademark on the name The Observer Dispatch. What the folks at The Observer Dispatch seem to not understand is my use of the name, The Observer Dispatch, is not in a manner that could be found confusing by those looking for The Observer Dispatch and in no way does my use of The Observer Dispatch constitute trademark infringement.
The Observer Dispatch has no legal authority to force me to stop referring to The Observer Dispatch as The Observer Dispatch. All my uses of the name The Observer Dispatch are done in reference to The Observer Dispatch and in no way imply that I represent The Observer Dispatch.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: O'rly
Oh, dear!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: O'rly
"With a special thanks to the lawyers of a particular area newspaper that would not like me to use their name, for giving me the inspiration to write this post."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Past, Present and Future prediction:
That path in this case is from GateHouse, to DogHouse and eventually the OutHouse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't lump us all together
Please, oh please don't lump all larger media orgs together under that statement. We're not all clueless...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't lump us all together
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hold on there
Well now, based on their response to this situation, I think I have to disagree with you on that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hold on there
Hurray! I finally used my psychology degree in the real world! You want fries with that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now come and sue me for writing that one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
,Nuff said.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
who is the moron here
Just look at the level of detail needed by the techdirect readers for a recent article.
"We had recently written about how a group called the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Inc (SMRi) had received trademarks on the name of the city of Sturgis, where the famed motorcycle rally is held each August. SMRi was then using the trademark to block the sale of souvenirs from any "unauthorized provider."
This is all the information a reader of Observer Dispatch would need.
We had recently written about how a group which had received trademarks on the name of the city, where a famed motorcycle rally is held each August. The group was then using the trademark to block the sale of souvenirs from any "unauthorized provider."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: who is the moron here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: who is the moron here
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: who is the moron here
Did you get permission from GateHouse Media to use "The Observer Dispatch" in your example? If not, expect to receive a letter like the following from some moron in your mailbox:
We wish to advise you that the name, "The Observer Dispatch," that you are using is the property of GateHouse Media, protected by trademark and past usage rights. Your use of such name constitutes infringement of GateHouse's rights under federal, state and common law. Our proprietary rights in such name include the right to restrict the use of the name. It is important that we exercise our right to protect our name. Its serves as an important and distinctive representation of the origin of our products as well as the goodwill of GateHouse Media.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Blogger Threatened
In a telephone interview this morning, that certain newspaper�s certain publisher (the Observer Dispatch�s Donna Donovan) warned, �I hope that Mr. Jadwick doesn�t think we�re kidding. Our parent company and I know exactly where he lives, we know where the schools are that his children attend, and, may God forgive us, we know where his mother is buried.�
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Blogger Threatened
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did I mention I own a Ford?
Worse yet, there are pictures in my gallery and they totally sued me for putting up pictures AND for having "Focus" in the URL.
They also totally sue Carmax every time they put a Ford up for sale on their website because it dilutes the trademark; people might think they're buying their used cars from Ford! So when I bought my redacted from redacted they couldn't actually tell me what I was buying. Because, you know, they'd totally get sued. I can't even tell you who I bought it from because they'll sue for trademark infringement if I mention I bought it at Carmax. Oops.
You don't even want to hear about GM and Chrysler.
P.S. This was totally a parody.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm confused, but...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gatehouse
The suit based on the information provided here sounds ridiculous on its face.
When something sounds that ridiculous, I've learned that often, there's more to the story. Clearly, not all the facts are available.
It's the same with the GHM vs. NYT law suit referenced here as "First it sued the NY Times for linking to it ..." Which is a bogus and complete miss-characterization of what the lawsuit was about. It's a complete facile toss off that doesn't even begin to get close to explaining the law suit.
And as a matter of disclosure, I worked for Gatehouse at the time of the suit and was involved in the case.
I'm no longer employed by GHM and know nothing about this case other than what is presented by Techdirt. I honestly and frankly have no desire to defend GHM, but experience tells me, we're not getting the whole story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]