Report Commissioned By EU Parliament Members Shows ACTA Will Increase Health Risks Worldwide
from the signing-on-to-kill-people dept
The members of the Green Party in the EU Parliament commissioned a report to look at the public health impact of ACTA. A draft of that report has been released and it warns of potentially severe negative impacts on public health. At issue: it will force member countries, including developing nations (which even WIPO has admitted are better off with more lax patent rules in order to deal with public health issues) to ratchet up enforcement of patents. Thus it is likely to "negatively impact public health worldwide." The report also points out that part of the problem is the secretive nature in which ACTA was negotiated, in which those who would have warned them of these public health problems were excluded from the negotiations. Furthermore, the report notes that the process ignored nine specific demands from the EU Parliament for transparency. The whole thing is a condemnation of ACTA, and should raise serious questions about why any country would sign on.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Wait a second...
That sure is a great way to "Progress the Arts and Sciences" as based on the ideals of our forefathers...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
FTFY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ACTA attempts to fight basic economics in too many ways. Economics always beats regulations in the end.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why wouldn't the European Green Party ask a university in Europe to do it?
This smells like "starting with the result and working backwards" again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Irony....too thick....can't....breathe....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
My Hypo-sense is tingling!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Which doesn't necessarily make it wrong!
I note you have no arguments other than ad hominem, as usual.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Good job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
It smells. What is a good premise and a good place to start a discussion is ruined because it really does appear that the Green party went "researcher shopping" until they found someone that agreed with them. That is the ultimate way to get the results you want.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
A minimum of 50 million dead because of the high price of pharma in 18 years.
Tell me how is that promoting the progress, or good for humanity?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
So what if every other time we've given them a break this never happens. This time will be different.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
No, I think someone else got it right, Flynn would appear to be leaning their way. Too bad Mike didn't take a few minutes to check things out before running with this stinky pile of poo.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Not surprising.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
You guys are all fast to pee all over reports you don't like, saying they aren't credible. I am saying that it is easy to see that this report has certain credibility issues before you even start reading, so why bother going any further? It is an agenda driven piece of "resear-formation", nothing more.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Believing the RIAA studies is like believing a drunk late at night in a bar.
After all that lying the trust is gone.
Even scientific experiments show that trust is a factor in how things are perceived and clearly the RIAA has none otherwise there wouldn't be so much people trashing your employer dude.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It proves only that you guys are dangerously clueless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
You mean like it doesn't make sense to hire a third party to audit a firm?
Why can't firms do their own auditing?
Why government should never be in a position where they are responsible for watching and doing something?
Can you show they did what you said they did, it is possible but they are not the ones with a really big long tails of past shopping in their belts so there is the trust thing, they are more legitimate than the MAFIAA will ever be.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Announce that you will be available one on one for private sessions if anyone has any issues they would like to bring up about their boss confidentially and you will get a TOTALLY different response....
I wonder why that is.... now 'think bigger' and you'll understand why they may have looked for an 'independent' review.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Boring trolls
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ACTA and Green Party
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: ACTA and Green Party
As for "Why Mr. Flynn?", it is surely because the large majority of his work involves advocating the removal of all perceived limitations on drug distribution worldwide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: ACTA and Green Party
More proof that this "study" is just another opinion piece framed to be a study.
Congratulations Mike Masnick, you have either (a) been completely hoodwinked by the Green Party, or (b) have completely failed in trying to sneak an astroturf "study" past our noses.
Either way, bad boy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]