Former Top Government Secrets Keeper Blasts Administration For Abusing Espionage Act To Punish Whistleblowers

from the sad dept

We've discussed the rather disappointing and immensely troubling efforts by the Obama administration, which promised more transparency and encouraged whistleblowing upon taking office, to attack whistleblowers any way it can. As noted, the administration has been using the Espionage Act -- which is supposed to be used against spies -- against whistleblowers, and has done so more often than all previous Presidents combined. Of course, the first big case against a whistleblower, Thomas Drake, completely collapsed.

Now it's come out that a former government official, J. William Leonard, who was in charge of the Information Security Oversight Office was so disturbed by the Thomas Drake case that he filed a formal complaint with both the Justice Department and the NSA and offered to testify on Drake's behalf that "there were no secrets at issue" and that he had never seen "a more deliberate and willful example of government officials improperly classifying a document."

Leonard held his role during the Bush administration (which was fairly notorious for secret keeping in its own right -- though not to this level). So some may argue that it's purely a political move. But these sorts of roles generally aren't particularly partisan, and even when there are political party differences, this sort of effort is pretty rare.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: espionage, free speech, nsa, obama, thomas drake, warrantless wiretapping, whistleblowing, william leonard


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    A Guy (profile), 26 Aug 2011 @ 4:42pm

    I despised Bush. I hated his approval of the continual erosion of our civil rights. I despised his economic policy. I saw the housing collapse coming. I thought, "There is no way a dem could do worse on civil rights or the economy" last time I voted. Maybe Obama isn't doing worse, but he's certainly not doing much better.

    I may be voting for a Republican next time around just because.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Ed C., 26 Aug 2011 @ 5:02pm

      Re:

      I actually didn't vote for McCain because I figured he'd do a lot of the same things that Obama turned around and did anyway. It's fairly obvious in hindsight that the Dems & GOP are just two sides of the same filthy coin.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2011 @ 10:14pm

      Re:

      I hate Corrupt Party 2 too, so I'm going to vote for Corrupt Party 1 this time! That will show them!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        A Guy (profile), 27 Aug 2011 @ 8:03am

        Re: Re:

        Better than voting for corrupt party 2. ;-)
        I'm still waiting for another party to be able to win an election.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        A Guy (profile), 27 Aug 2011 @ 8:03am

        Re: Re:

        Better than voting for corrupt party 2. ;-)
        I'm still waiting for another party to be able to win an election.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      pixelpusher220 (profile), 29 Aug 2011 @ 9:28am

      Re:

      My hindsight opinion was we hadn't hit rock bottom on disastrous GOP policies yet. Obama got handed impending disaster and has made some head way cleaning it up, but has been stymied at every point by the GOP in the Senate and now the House. But it also ends up looking like his disaster since he's the one cleaning it up.

      Couple that with absolutely pathetic messaging and the Tea Party is born in a fact free zone and now you can't have a rational argument with anybody in the GOP.

      But no Obama has not been near the 'leader' most hoped for. Compromise is fine, but not as your starting position which is what he's done at almost every turn.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    abc gum, 26 Aug 2011 @ 5:40pm

    The two party system is sock puppet theater, whose sole purpose is to divide the public and keep them bickering amongst themselves whilst devious deals are consummated.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2011 @ 6:53pm

    To be honest I don't believe is the Obama administration doing anything but not doing it.

    Obama is not a leader, that much is clear by now and he just don't order anything apparently, he let others decide what to do and he just acquiesces to the proposals he has no vision and those issues and where he does have a vision he is not good enough to implement those he lacks the "unity bug" that makes people come around and hear things.

    With that said the real problem may be a uncontrolled government that have career bureaucrats calling the shots without having ever had to deal with the public.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 26 Aug 2011 @ 7:26pm

      Re:

      Please rephrase this: 'To be honest I don't believe is the Obama administration doing anything but not doing it.'

      The syntax is so tortured, I can't make heads or tails of it.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • icon
        BeeAitch (profile), 26 Aug 2011 @ 8:54pm

        Re: Re:

        FWIW I parsed it as:

        To be honest I don't believe it is the Obama administration doing anything, but not doing anything.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Clouser, 27 Aug 2011 @ 4:10am

    Get Obama and his Cronies out in 2012!

    Two Words: RON PAUL!




    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Thomas (profile), 27 Aug 2011 @ 4:51am

    Corruption

    is rampant in the government. It is not a republican or democrat thing; it is just the nature of our government. Whistleblowers are lucky they do not get charged with treason and sent without trial to a "work camp" in some godforsaken place. All governments hate whistleblowers, and the more corrupt the government is the more they hate whistleblowers.

    What congress most fears is someone managing to create a chart showing how much each congressman received (both up front and under the table) from corporations and showing how the congressman voted on issues concerning corporations. Of course all it would show is that every member of congress is corrupt to some degree.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.