Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the come-for-the-insight,-stay-for-the-funny dept
Short week due to Labor Day, but felt like a long week, so let's get to it. Winning the most insightful comment of the week was MrWilson, responding to one of the more ridiculous comments we've seen in a while, where one of our regular critics seemed rather confused and ignorant of how the law works, and MrWilson set him straight:1. Let's apply the same logic to other situations:It makes me happy when you guys vote up comments that respond to clueless comments. Not that it helped with this guy (who doesn't want to be helped -- he revels in being willfully ignorant). His response to MrWilson? "what an ignorant piece of drivel." Of course, since the folks here found it the most insightful post of the week, perhaps -- just perhaps -- this particular commenter might want to open his mind a bit and recognize that perhaps he's misjudging who's the ignorant party.
"Your honor, my client didn't kill the victim because the victim's soul is immortal and is living on in another plane of existence."
2. The speech being restrained is not the infringement of copyrighted streams of sporting events. The speech being restrained is all of the speech being made on the website, including Puerto 80's discussion forums and webmaster's content. Since Puerto 80 isn't infringing any content, restraining their speech without evidence that they are actually infringing is illegal. Which is the entire point that Puerto 80 is making that you keep ignoring.
3. You've got it backwards. If the US government wants the website unavailable to the US, it needs to pass such a law making it so. It's not Puerto 80's responsibility that the internet doesn't have international boundaries
Coming in a rather close second was a comment from the eejit, in response to the news that the RIAA was issuing takedowns on music being purposely given away for free from a Universal Music website by Universal Music's most successful songwriter. The eejit noted that this makes a strong statement:
See this? This right here?Ok. Two quick editor's choice awards. First up, we have Derek Kerton with the perfect analogy to the story of the US government blaming Google (to the tune of $500 million) for some illegal pharmacies placing ads on its platform:
THIS right here is why PRO IP and ACTA and all the other stupid fucking acronym laws need to die in a fire. HARD. It's not about the fucking artists. It's all about the middlemen's pockets.
There are crimes committed, like illegal drug sales on street corners in many towns. We should hold the government accountable for those crimes. They should fine themselves $500M because other people are doing "no-nos" on their infrastructure, and they should be forced to stop it from happening.And then we have an Anonymous Cowards explaining the true impact of copyright expansionism:
When they succeed at stopping all crimes on all streets, that will prove to Google that it is possible to do such a thing, and Google can follow the shining example.
I suggest the gov't call it "THE WAR ON DRUGS", and that we always write it in all-caps to illustrate the magnanimity of it. It should be over in a few weeks, and then won't Google look so silly!!
The more copyright is extended, perverted, abused, and forced upon populations who are never permitted any say in the matter, the more people who would never give copyright a second thought will be affected negatively somehow.But, of course, you're all really here for the funny. The winner this week had the most votes ever... and beat out second place by a factor of three! Yes, believe it or not, this comment from Chronno S. Trigger had more than three times the number of votes of the second place comment. It was a simple comment in response to the story of Ubisoft screwing up the printing of its one-time use codes, such that the game only came with 19-digit codes when it required 25-digit codes. Chronno had an idea what really happened:
Since copyright only exists by consent of the public, don't be surprised when the public decides that copyright no longer serves them and they declare it null and void.
We sure it was a printing error and not Game Stop taking out the extra 6 characters?That's what's known as a callback.
Coming in a respectable second was John Doe's thoughts on the news that the RIAA is issuing takedown notices for Twitter messages that link to music released directly on a Universal Music website by the musician behind it, who was actively encouraging people to share the work freely. Doe knew what must be coming next:
So Universal Music is a rogue site? I guess ICE will be confiscating Universal's website any time now.For editor's choice, we'll start with a pair of related comments that both made me laugh. In response to the story of some researchers claiming that Facebook leads to drinking and drug use after they appeared to not understand the difference between correlation and causation, Chris O'Donnell took things a step further in explaining his parenting secrets:
Neither of my teenagers will open a Facebook account, because, as they put it, if I'm on Facebook it can't be cool. Neither of my teenagers is drinking or doing drugs either.To which Dark Helmet replied:
So obviously, hanging on out FB as a parent keeps your kids away from drugs and alcohol.
And people told me this parenting thing would be difficult.
In the spirit of fucking up correlation and causation, I can only assume that you drink and do drugs heavily.Finally, we'll end on a funny comment from Beta, which involves another callback. His comment was on the story of the Double Rainbow dude issuing bogus DMCA notices and insisting that he'll "change the law" if it turns out filing bogus DMCA notices is illegal. Beta wondered if there might be a connection to another story we've covered recently:
Yay! This is fun!
See what happens when people can no longer get affordable medication from Canada?A shame indeed. That's that for this week... Play nice.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Things like that make Rush Limbaugh's dittoheads appear to be deep thinkers with unique opinions.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Your dittohead comment shows where your point of view is coming from. And your talking points are fed to you by the likes of MSNBC, the NY Times, et al....
Looks like you're not so unique, yourself.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh, that is so clich�.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
That Mike had turned out to be a bagger makes it even more amusing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Even trolls need to eat.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Pro tip: comments like that one won't get you any badges (or friends).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[/sarc]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
yup
so what would you call deliberately ignorant drivel being posted over and over on a site you obviously don't like in an attempt to shut up those who don't share your views on how perfect and awesome that copyright/patent god of yours is?
i call it stupid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You look like a fool, quacks like one so you must be one :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eye of the Beholder
Reminds me of the old joke: A woman, knowing her husband is driving on the highway, calls him and warns, "Be careful! The news just reported that someone's driving the wrong way!" He says, "One!?! There's hundreds of them!"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]