No Surprise: Scammers Focus On Tricking The French With False Three Strikes Infringement Notices

from the but-of-course dept

Tue, Oct 18th 2011 10:26pm — Mike Masnick

We've seen similar scams for a few years now, but with the French three strikes administrators, Hadopi, sending out 650,000 first strike notices, it should come as no surprise that the scammers have jumped in to try to take advantage of people. They're sending notices to people pretending to be infringement notices from Hadopi. They ask people to click through to access their report. Following the link brings you to a cleverly faked Hadopi website, which asks for a registration code and provides the following instructions:

�To get the access code by SMS: Send CODE to 81083. For the confirmation code by SMS: send CODE to 81015. To get the access code by phone: call the following number: 0899 230 141. Confirmation code by phone: call the following number: 0899 230 148.�

And that's where the scam part comes in. The numbers are apparently premium access numbers, meaning that sending those text messages will end up costing quite a bit. Pretty sneaky. Yet another example of the kind of collateral damage created when you set up systems that treat people as guilty without any hearing or trial. It leaves itself wide open for abuse from scammers.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: france, hadopi, scams

45 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 10:43pm

Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
What surprises me with these scams (making people call/sms to "premium" numbers) is: why do the numbers continue to stand? Shouldn't it be relatively easy to, if not figure out who's behind it (ok, that might be nontrivial), at least to stop the service?
In my country the press speculated that bacause the telcos running the numbers get a nice cut off what the scammers make (for providing the service), they are not too motivated to stop this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 11:00pm
  
  Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
  Because we are just a service provider that someone has used for wrong doing.
  
  It should be easy to find out who is behind it, the money is paid to someone. But the telcos have no interest in having this revenue stream dry up. Besides you have the added bonus of being able to say the people who answered must be guilty of something if they thought the accusation was true and tried to pay it off.
  
  In the US for a long time there was a scam called "cramming" where bad people would stuff a bunch of costly services onto your bill without your permission. They kept this going for a very long time, and the telcos seemed reluctant to just stop the ability of this to happen.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 4:44am
    
    Re: Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
    You say "cramming" like it was something from the past and it is not happening anymore, I am almost certain that the practice is still alive and well.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - freak (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:05am
      
      Re: Re: Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
      I remember working in a cell centre for comcast . . . we were instructed to lie to people about the itemized billing if we saw this happening.
      
      Yep. Ethical.
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - New Mexico Mark, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:38am
    
    Re: Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
    FWIW, We have a bad habit of accidentally putting our dog's name (and our last name) on most forms where we think there is any reasonable chance of getting spammed or worse. One result is that our dog now gets more junk mail than we do.
    
    This worked out especially well one time when we noticed that a new "service" had been showing up on our phone bill for several months. We called the telco to protest and they *insisted* that according to their records, ordered it and there was nothing they could do. We calmly replied that we knew with 100 percent certainty that the individual they claimed ordered it had not done so, and that we would gladly prove this in court (plus damages) if they did not immediately stop the service and refund all charges. They backed down right away and we got a full refund with no further questions asked.
    
    While we were bemused by this event it is sad to consider that this doesn't really help more vulnerable people who get get bullied by these telco-crammer "partnerships", does it?
    
    NMM
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- chillienet (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 11:06pm
  
  Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
  From the linked article:
  "The fake site has been taken down and the number has been blocked by the authorities, but will no doubt reappear on another compromised server with a new number in due course."
  
  It takes time before someone that gets caught in these type of things reports it to the authorities, it then takes a bit more time for the authorities to confirm it and shut it down. Who knows how many people will get sucked in before then, and then it is just a matter of rinse and repeat with a new batch of victims.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:55am
    
    Re: Re: Why do numers surive for longer than a tiny bit of time?
    Yup, I have to say I haven't read TFA. (I was half-sleeping back when I wrote my comment.)
    
    Thinking of this a bit more, it's not a black-and-white situation: there probably is a whole spectrum of services using these numbers, from completely ok to shady to outright scams using these numbers. So it might be tough to decide in some cases if it's still ok or not.
    
    In fact I could see some similarities between pushing telcos to police over this and pushing ISPs (or other companies, like YouTube) to police over their users' actions. Though it still feels a bit different: a scam seems worse to me than a "civil" copyright infringement.
    
    But like in copyright infringement, deciding if given "service" is a scam or not might be blurry, so should anybody force telcos to do it?
    
    Similarly, as some people argue ISPs have no motivation to crush on illegal filesharing because they make some money out of that, the same can be said about telcos and these "premium" numbers.
    
    Still, something doesn't sound right in this comparison... feel free to point it out.
    
    Anyway, in the end it's the law enforcement that should deal with that quickly and try to find and punish the scammers.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 11:29pm

Pirate Party
The Pirate Party of France must be thrilled with all this free advertising for them, done by Hadopi. Now scammers are getting into the act. It just gets better and better. Sarkozy seems to have committed political suicide. Does anybody know how well the Pirate Party is doing in the polls in France?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:23am

pirate masnick
pirate masnick is two step off castle of shame
box of empty
stupid punch man
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:37am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  Your bitterness and disappointment always make me smile. I see it as a positive thing. It shows me that those of us against the current copyright laws are indeed having an impact. The copyright maximialists are helpless and they know it. The only recourse they really have is to curse the heavens in disgust and post nonsense on blogs like this one. How can that not put a huge smile on the faces of everyone? :-D
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Major, 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:31am
    
    Re: Re: pirate masnick
    To answer the question : The french's "Partie Pirate" failed to get enough backer to get aknowledged as a party this year, better luck next one :)
    
    Oh and by the way there is a funny tidbit people should know , the scam and the real mail are awfully similar in a way since if you delete the mail upfront, even if it was real as long as you do not reply to it they cannot move up to the next "Strike" since the law stipulate that it is only allowed to move to the next stage if the recipient of the mail actually read it.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Major, 19 Oct 2011 @ 2:33am
      
      Re: Re: Re: pirate masnick
      Crap that was meant for the ACabove sorry :[
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Major, 19 Oct 2011 @ 2:33am
      
      Re: Re: Re: pirate masnick
      Crap that was meant for the AC above sorry :[
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:19am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  DELIGHT IN THE PAIN![/Taldaram]
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Berenerd (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:29am
    
    Re: Re: pirate masnick
    My roommate, she has a twisted sense of humor, has a shirt that says "Your pain makes me squee!" I think that is fitting here.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- That Anonymous Coward (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:20am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  You need to find an adult to take you to the nearest ER right away. You seem to be having a stroke, that was more disjointed than normal and I am concerned for your well being.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 2:23am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  Are you on drugs mate? You sound incoherent and seem to be addressing a hallucinated demon.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 4:54am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  pirate masnick is two step off castle of shame
  box of empty
  stupid punch man
  
  Attention to the administrators of this chatbot. It seems to have crashed.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Donnicton, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:01am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  That was the worst haiku I've ever read.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous American, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:34am
    
    Re: Re: pirate masnick
    Chatbot often works
    Today the chatbot does not
    Windows is like that
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- btr1701 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 10:32am
  
  Re: pirate masnick
  > pirate masnick is two step off castle of shame
  > box of empty
  > stupid punch man
  
  May I momma dog face in the banana patch?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Hero, 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:36am

I'm really not surprised that this has popped up, but in all fairness, this sort of thing happens all the time, to all sorts of companies and government services. There are plenty of legitimate reasons that France's three-strikes law should not have been put into place; it would be best if we could focus on those. Scams like this need to be addressed, but they are ultimately a sideshow that can detract from the law's deeper problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Richard (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 3:30am
  
  Re:
  Scams like this need to be addressed, but they are ultimately a sideshow that can detract from the law's deeper problems.
  
  I can't agree there. To me it seems that one oth the worst aspects of th law (the fact that it creates a new para-legal process outside the normal rules) is intimately connected with the existence of these scams. The existence of the law creates uncertainty in the minds of scam victims, which the scammers are exploiting. In other words if you fixed the problems with the law the scams would not have arisen.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
mike allen (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 2:39am

why did the french not see this coming.
oh i forgot politicians bought and paid for!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 3:39am
  
  Re:
  Not quite. See, the PM is married to a French entertainer. So instead of money and hookers, it's juts money and plain old sex.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:45am
    
    Re: Re:
    Not only is she an entertainer she's a model. So I'm not sure if I'd call it "plain old sex."
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich Kulawiec, 19 Oct 2011 @ 4:01am

Spammers copying spammers
The spammers pulling these scams are just copying the spammers at Hadopi. What the latter is doing is pre-training their victims to be susceptible to far more damaging attacks. I'm sure this is only the beginning, and that increasingly sophisticated attacks will arrive in short order.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Hephaestus (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:45am
  
  Re: Spammers copying spammers
  I was thinking the same thing, this is an opportunity for someone to very quickly build a new bot-net. With 650,000 notifications, and everyone knowing more will follow. It should be easy enough to email a link to a sizeable chunk of the France population and end up with a couple million enslaved machines.
  
  Unintended consequences ... you have got to love them.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 4:53am

If Hadopi was about to stop these type of scams people would love to have censor laws in place.

Maybe the industry should use these as propaganda instead of focusing on their monopoly that sounds bad. look bad and nobody cares.

Now scammers trying to cheat others? Everybody would love a law that took everything from those people without due process or scrutiny, the politicians would then be able to step into the sun again.

Never mind that what empowered the crooks in the first place was laws made to protect special interests or that they would be stripping due process and start doing what they did with every other censor tool available just start labelling others criminals to justify it, but in this case they have something that the public also don't like and can show it to everyone.

How many would buy into that line of thinking?
Given the child pornography paranoia I believe the numbers would be high.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:20am

This reminds me of some scams I've heard of collection agencies pulling. Like pretending to be the police and saying they're going to arrest you if you don't pay off the debts you owe right away. That of course is illegal, but it's quite profitable for unethical collection agencies willing to buy the debt for pennies on the dollar.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
out_of_the_blue, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:20am

Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
Sure, maybe not everyone who calls is an actual /pirate/; it's guilty conscience that prompts the call though, that makes them "wide open for abuse from scammers". There's a down side to pirating. As in the Bible: "the wicked flee when no man pursues".

And of course Mike thinks that his acolyte pirates should suffer no consequence at all...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rich, 19 Oct 2011 @ 7:41am
  
  Re: Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
  It's NOT a guilty conscience. It the fear of the bully that is larger and much more powerful than you. You hope all you lose is your lunch money.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - ltlw0lf (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 4:30pm
    
    Re: Re: Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
    It's NOT a guilty conscience. It the fear of the bully that is larger and much more powerful than you. You hope all you lose is your lunch money.
    
    Exactly.
    
    If I was contacted by HADOPI and accused of stealing my first impulse would be to call them and get as much information I can to be used against them during a legal defense (or just to tell them "Come at me Bro" because I live in another country.) When I see something wrong on a bill, I tend to call the company immediately and let them know that there is a problem. I would certainly get hit by these scammers calling for more information, not because I have a guilty conscious.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The Groove Tiger (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 8:06am
  
  Re: Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
  Yes, of course. If you get a "legitimate" HADOPI letter, and you have done nothing wrong, then you can safely ignore it. Same thing if you get sued, or get a police order for your arrest. It's not like you have to, you know, try to clear things up, just ignore stuff and everything will be a-ok.
  
  I suppose that's the argument you're making. If the police come to arrest you, just say "I would prefer not to" and they will understand that the charges against you are false.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:57pm
    
    Re: Re: Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
    oddly, apparantly the HADOPI thing is screwed up enough that ignoring it actually Does work because the process stalls without a response.
    
    at least according to some other commenters.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 24 Oct 2011 @ 2:33pm
  
  Re: Oh, that's low. /Pirates/ getting scammed.
  Except that when I'm being threatened with something I know I didn't do, I still freak the hell out. Not because I think I 'deserve it' but because "WHAT THE FUCK?! HOW THE HELL DID YOU GET THAT IDEA?! WHAT?! WHAT?! WHAT THE FUCK?! I DON'T EVEN WHAT?! and perhaps in the modern day WHO THE HELL STOLE MY IDENTITY AND WHAT DID THEY DO WITH IT?!"
  
  Confusion is a very potent emotion, much more so then fear.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:34am

" Yet another example of the kind of collateral damage created when you set up systems that treat people as guilty without any hearing or trial. It leaves itself wide open for abuse from scammers."

I could see this line coming from far, far away. It's bullshit, but I could see it coming.

Mike, you are getting to the point of blaming the victim for getting raped. By your logic, it's a bank's fault for having an online banking option that scammers can use as a basis to steal your info by creating fake versions of it. Perhaps you would want to blame facebook or paypal for similar scams that used their name.

My email regularly features people trying to spoof famous sites for profit, usually to obtain your username and password so they can break in and steal your money. Are you going to blame the banks for this?

I know you hate the three strikes law. But geez, can you try to be a little less transparent on your hater mentality?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Rich, 19 Oct 2011 @ 7:43am
  
  Re:
  You are really gonna play this as the big conglomerate being the victim of rape?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 7:48am
    
    Re: Re:
    You spelled copyright infringement wrong.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
    - Rich, 19 Oct 2011 @ 8:11am
      
      Re: Re: Re:
      How does one misspell a phrase they do not use?
      [ link to this | view in chronology ]
      - Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:02pm
        
        Re: Re: Re: Re:
        yeah, that one went right past you, huh?
        it's a meme, and your question is half the point.
        
        read it as your post quoted but 'rape' replaced with 'copyright infringment' and followed by the line 'FTFY'.
        
        it's basically the same thing.
        [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- The eejit (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 12:49pm
  
  Re:
  You just equated copyright infringement with rape.
  
  One of these causes considerable psychological trauma, the other may cause financial trauma. The fact that, in your opinion, the two are equal shows your disdain for something that many consider worse than the actual killing of a person. And you claim to be on the "right" side?
  
  If you're on the "right" side of this debate, I don't want to be on the "right" side.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Anonymous Coward, 20 Oct 2011 @ 10:27am
    
    Re: Re:
    Nope, I did not in any way equate copyright infringement with rape. Nice mis-read, nice attempt to ignore the point. Are you really that stupid, or are you just trying hard to be a fucking asshole about it?
    
    The point is only the "blame the victim" mentality. Replace "rape victim" with "victim of Nigeria Scam Mail" or "victim of credit card fraud" or "victim of a drunk driver", and you get the same results. Like it or not, Hadopi isn't to blame for this stuff, they are the victims of it as well.
    
    If you can get your head out of your ass for a minute, maybe you can understand that basic idea.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rich Griese, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:47am

would have been helpful if you explain in the post what the "three strike" rule in france is or is about. I am not familiar with that, so the post didn't make much sense to me.

Cheers! RichGriese.NET
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shawnhcorey (profile), 20 Oct 2011 @ 9:41am

If anyone refuses cash, then they forgive the debt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]