US Blocks Chinese Company From Contract Bid: Worried China Might Spy On US Just As US Spied On Others

from the what's-sauce-for-the-goose-is-sauce-for-the-gander dept

Tue, Oct 18th 2011 7:29pm — Glyn Moody

Preserving national security is obviously crucially important, but that concern is hardly the preserve of any one country. The US government seems to have forgotten this in banning Huawei from bidding for a major US telecommunications contract:

Worried about potential spying, the U.S. government has blocked a bid from China�s telecommunications giant Huawei to help build a new national wireless network for first responders such as police, firefighters, and ambulances.

Huawei �will not be taking part in the building of America�s interoperable wireless emergency network for first responders due to U.S. government national-security concerns,� Commerce Department spokesman Kevin Griffis told The Daily Beast.

What's the fear here?

Griffis declined to elaborate on those concerns. But current and retired U.S. intelligence officials tell The Daily Beast the longstanding concern about Huawei is that the company�s chips, routers, and other technical equipment will be bugged in a way that gives China�s government a cyber back door into sensitive information networks.

The technique of bugging equipment or writing software in such a way as to allow undetected access has also been used by U.S. intelligence agencies in the past to gain a window into the communications of other foreign governments.

So, in effect, the US government is worried that the Chinese might do to it what the US has done to other governments.

That's a perfectly reasonable fear: by now, the Chinese intelligence agencies doubtless have the technological capability to do so. But China actually has rather more grounds for concern when buying US communications technology or software: after all, the US has already carried out spying in this way.

This latest move just gives China the perfect excuse for blocking US companies bidding for "sensitive" Chinese projects in the future. When the US complains � as it surely will � the Chinese will simply point back to this episode, noting the symmetry of the situation, and their own worries about national security.

Wouldn't it have been wiser to come up with better tools for detecting attempts to introduce back doors into hardware and software? That would have raised the US's general readiness in this area against all such threats, not just those from China, and would not have given China or any other country a pretext for shutting the US out from their markets.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: china, spying, telco infrastructure, us

40 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

A Guy (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 7:59pm

I think you're forgetting that China already uses several means to block US competition in their country and elsewhere. This seems like an intelligent move on the US's part.

In fact, I bet Chinese actions in the US/China dynamic is behind a lot of the political will to pass the asinine IP laws that are discussed here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 8:02pm

Christ, now a China apologist too. You are a worthless sack of shit Moody.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Blake (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 8:12pm

The choice against Huawei is quite likely to be more about spying than they admit.

Not only would the US Govt be worried about China putting in back doors on their turf. The US Govt would want whichever US company that builds the network to put in their own back doors so that the US Govt can spy on it's own people.

With Huawei involved, the US Govt wouldn't be able to keep that secret. Not that it's a huge secret with all the warrantless wiretapping going on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kaden (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 8:30pm

Re:
Where are your manners, son?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ryan, 18 Oct 2011 @ 8:39pm

The Chinese are so innocent though right?
Yet you fail to mention how the Chinese have hired countless hacking groups in their country to hack, infiltrate, steal company secrets all in the name of their government...So they should just listen to your article, blame the US and let the Chinese spy on our networks which would in fact happen. I would love to live in this naive Disneyland esque world you live in.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Original Anonymous Coward (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 8:56pm

If a US firm bids on a telecom project in China...
... they'd just be selling telecom equipment to the Chinese that has been manufactured in China, so the Chinese would just be spying on themselves.

Oh, wait... They do that already.

Sorry, my bad.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Larry, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:00pm

Um, yeah...
China would likely be using US built tech if selected to build the contracted network.

Example:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110522/23484014387/cisco-sued-helping-china -repress-falun-gong.shtml

Is Cisco helping other countries "manage" their wide area networks? Sure. Wonder how much control they'll really have if push comes to shove.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:01pm

Re:
and who are you?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:15pm

Given that most cyber attacks come from China and somehow make it through their great firewall, I'd say it's a safe assumption the chinese can't be trusted with our infrastructure.

That's not to say the US is any different, but I trust my evil empire more than I trust theirs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:16pm

Re: Re:
Hahahahahahaha. I'm being called out....... anonymously?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:17pm

P.S. The chinese trying to spy on our infrastructure is NOTHING new.

http://news.softpedia.com/news/FBI-039-s-Own-Offices--Infected-with-Counterfeit-Cisco-Hardware-8 5312.shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
William, 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:24pm

Meh
Usually you're pretty accurate, but this time I call bull. China has a long history of human rights violations, and while some would say the US does as well, it's unfair to compare with the atrocities the Chinese commit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Colin (profile), 18 Oct 2011 @ 9:33pm

Chances are though that a large amount of the equipment any other supplier provides to fulfill this contract will be made in China (or have substantial portions made in China), so the back doors may be there anyway.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gnosti, 18 Oct 2011 @ 10:28pm

Heh
It's like the old adage goes, "The only thing a thief hates is another thief". Well, that and greater regulations and oversight on their thieving.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 18 Oct 2011 @ 10:52pm

Re: Re: Re:
I'm not the one delivering personal attacks to someone who is not anonymous. If you want to deliver personal attacks to a non-anonymous person, don't expect people to take you seriously when you're anonymous and provide no transparency with regard to your background.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 18 Oct 2011 @ 11:11pm

If You Want An Example Of What The US Has Done ...
... go read about the Crypto AG case.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Marcel de Jong (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:25am

In Dutch we have a saying that says: "The way the inn-keeper is, is the way he trusts his guests."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dv, 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:37am

spying?
The scare isn't spying, I think. Rather, the concern is being able to shit down first responder networks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The eejit (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 3:36am

Re: The Chinese are so innocent though right?
Whoosh.

The US Government did this as recently as last year, and that was documented. So I find it amusing that the US is all high and mighty about this now, when it's probably been an issue for many years.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ahow628 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:24am

Made in the USA
It's a good thing that whatever US firm is chosen will use equipment sourced, manufactured, and assembled in the US. None of that stuff will come from or occur in China. Am I right or am I right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:36am

This is one case where I do agree with the US government, and if other countries did this I agree with them too.

And the fact that the government is willing to risk a trade war over it just may put some value into the words of those people, you are risking something, this is not something that comes easy.

I don't think any government in the world should trust a third party with their infra-structure this is something every country in the world should strive to get it done at home.

This is why the US has little saying when it comes to GPS competitors that sprung up all over the world nobody will put their own missiles in the trust of the American controlled system, not the Europeans, not the Chinese, not the Russians and not even the Japanese, these are all the countries that have their own GPS like constellations of satellites, with only the Europeans the only other group who will have global coverage.

And yes this is a form of discrimination and most probably is a trade violation, and it is good that people make noise about it and all that so it doesn't become the rule and it starts to be used a lot, but I will look the otherside on this one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
aikoaiko2, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:45am

Re: Meh
I'm no fan of China, but it is perfectly fair to compare the US's record of human rights violations to China's. The US incarcerates more people, per capita, then any other country in the world, we run our own goulog (Gitmo), and have started to export our laws by attempting to prosecute foreign nationals. China has no love for its people, but the US seems to be holding ots own.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 5:56am

So your argument is that the U.S. is hypocritical if we want to protect ourselves against behaviors that we ourselves have engaged in? Like nuclear weapons, unprovoked invasion and espionage? How's the weather in your fantasy world?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hephaestus (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:34am

"Wouldn't it have been wiser to come up with better tools for detecting attempts to introduce back doors into hardware and software?"

Doesn't the DMCA or some other poorly written law disallow you from even trying?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
G, 19 Oct 2011 @ 6:46am

Is this supposed to be some sort of moral argument about U.S. spying? Wrong bark. Wrong tree.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Oct 2011 @ 9:50am

Like when Boeing sold China their Air Force 1 equivalent and the Chinese found dozens of bugs planted within it? Haha. Our government is seriously incompetent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 10:41am

Intel
> So, in effect, the US government is worried
> that the Chinese might do to it what the US
> has done to other governments.

Yep. That's the way the intelligence business works. You do to them, then guard against them doing it to you.

Just like we do everything we can to keep foreign intelligence agencies from spying on us, while at the same time operating a group you may have heard of called the CIA, whose sole mission is to do to other countries exactly what we don't want them doing to us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 10:45am

Re: Re: The Chinese are so innocent though right?
> So I find it amusing that the US is all high
> and mighty about this now, when it's probably
> been an issue for many years.

I find it amusing how deeply naive so many people here seem to be.

Yes, the US tries to prevent foreign nations from spying.

Yes, the US spies on foreign nations.

Welcome to the real world. EVERY country does this. It's how the intelligence business works and has done for centuries.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 10:47am

Re: spying?
> the concern is being able to shit down first
> responder networks

Yeah, that can get messy. The last thing you want during a crisis is a bunch of shit clogging up your network. ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:05pm

Re: Re: Re:
it is amusing, true.

though the point, which is 'and why the hell should we take any meaning from your statement other than that you're a spiteful arse', stands none the less.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:06pm

Re: Re: Re: The Chinese are so innocent though right?
pretty sure no one was disagreeing with that bit. or if they were i missed it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:09pm

Re:
i fail to see why. Other evil empires can't screw over your day to day life. yours can. other evil empires aren't affected if you know what they're up to, yours is, and so on and so forth.

then again, 'trust' can mean many things. (trust someone to be honest, trust them to be predictable, trust them to have your best interests as a primary objective, trust them not to be an idiot...) some are more dependant on the availability of data and past actions than on actual trustworthyness, i guess.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:12pm

Re:
i'd say yes, it's hypocritical, at least on some levels.

doesn't mean it's necessarily Wrong. (doesn't make it necessarily Right either...)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chargone (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:13pm

Re:
since when did that stop governments doing it anyway?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
btr1701 (profile), 19 Oct 2011 @ 1:43pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: The Chinese are so innocent though right?
> pretty sure no one was disagreeing with that
> bit. or if they were i missed it.

Well, the article itself seems to be pointing out a double-standard or hypocrisy by the US.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yang Changshi, 19 Oct 2011 @ 7:59pm

Down with all anti-china fools and morons and let them be removed from the senate, congress and admin now!
Down with all anti-china fools and morons and let them be removed from the senate, congress and admin now!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
timmaguire42 (profile), 23 Oct 2011 @ 12:39pm

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Chinese are so innocent though right?
Exactly. The childish ignorance of this article is impressive. Every country spies, every country tries to stop others from spying on them. That's how it works, that's how it has always worked, that's how it should work.

The notion that there is something hypocritical about that is, well...hypocrisy is irrelevant to international relations. As it should be.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uncle B, 25 Oct 2011 @ 10:06am

The Dance
All part of the dance between Asian super-intelligentsia and communist central planning committee the year plans and America's four year scramble for who's boss next! It does not really matter much, as Asian technologies pull ahead of American technologies, as Asians show a scientific flexibility where Americans show ruts, dug in corporations, sunk money corporately protected, legacy inertia, and "hardening of the arteries" where even 'muscle cars' are foisted on a population needing bullet trains,cheap and effective public transportation for workers, and foreign oil consumption maintains the "status quo" even after decades of knowing full well the Prairie Wind Corridor wastes more Btu's than America consumes, the South Western America Solar losses exceed even this! All Domestic (no "parasite" oil nation support required)all cheaper, paybacks calculated in terms of decades,and yet America turns her back on the final economic solution to her dilemma! no! This time around war will not resove the economic depression! Israel must not play the American war card for America by engaginf with Iran! Iran os China's "Gasoline Tank" is so well defended, and the Chinese will simply "suggest" that American Military 'Stand Down" as they obliterate Israel from the face of the earth, leaving only glazed earth there as a reminder to all, and a place as a footnote in history. America, on pain of losing her U.S.Dollar will quietly obey! What "counter-offer has Israel? Can Israel destroy the U.S.Dollar? Can Israel wage war against all Asia? China? even north Korea? Can the u.S.A.? Without "Conscription" and "pogroms" like in Europe once upon a time, of bitter hatred breaking out in the U.S. ? Bet the u.S, tends to its gaping horrors at home before advising the rest the world on 'how it should be". Time to withdraw, consolidate, recuperate the forces, heal the wounds, tend the battle-fatigued, and gain strength for at least a generation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
1Piece, 4 Nov 2011 @ 8:24pm

Let's all hold hand together now and sing KUMBAYA!!! my fren KUMBAYA!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
James, 14 Mar 2013 @ 9:23pm

Re:
Yeah, the bugs we wanted them to find....
[ link to this | view in thread ]