Swedish Study Shows File Sharing And Music Buying Go Hand-In-Hand
from the also:-spotify-is-HUGE dept
It's an argument often made here at Techdirt: file sharers aren't always just leeches on the underside of content creators. Very often, they are true music fans constantly patrolling the cutting edge of music. A study released by Sweden's Internet Infrastructure Foundation shows that, among other things, Spotify is certifiably big with younger internet users (85% of those aged 16-25 use Spotify) along with some other interesting statistics:In Sweden, Spotify usage is even running ahead of use of community sites, IM, blog reading and game playing.Spotify's enormous market share no doubt is related to it being a truly "native" application, and while it is definitely more popular with the under-25 crowd, it still is popular enough to supplant other internet activities including "use of community sites, IM, blog reading and game playing."
One in three people (37%) listen to Spotify during a month, which is twice as many as file sharing (18%) and many more than those who buy a CD (9%) or pay per song (4%) during a month.
Of course, Sweden also gave the world the Pirate Party, so it's also unsurprising that file sharing is bigger than ever, with 21% of those surveyed indicating that they share on a regular basis. But it's not all bad news for the music industry. On top of near universal adoption of fully legal streaming via Spotify, the report also indicates that file sharers are on par with non-file sharers when it comes to purchasing music:
"If we compare file-sharers with those who do not share files, we find that there is no difference in how often they buy CDs. However, a larger percentage of file sharers pay to download individual songs than those who do not share files."In fact, it looks as if file sharers may be purchasing more music than their non-sharing counterparts. In fact, despite the fact that the Pirate Party originated in Sweden, the outlook for Sweden's recording industry has been on the upswing since 2009, when it posted a 10.2% gain. Most of this was due to streaming services, which accounted for nearly 50% of Swedish music revenue.
The Swedish arm of the IFPI also credits new legislation with the reduction in file sharing, along with the new streaming services. According to its numbers, 6 out 10 file sharers either stopped or reduced their sharing in response to the legislation.
No matter which angle you view this from, using the IFPI's numbers or the Internet Infrastructure Foundation's, it's obvious that well-crafted legal streaming services are taking a bite out of file sharing. If the Big
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: file sharing, studies, sweden
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
oh wait, no they haven't.
This is the usual Friday troll, for Saturday comments.
stale.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Next
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In times without widespread file sharing, these would be the mega-fans, buying plenty of music.
Considering recorded music sales (including online) are down 58% since the inception of Napster, I would say that any claim that piracy helps is completely, totally debunked.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
File sharing is how people younger than you discover new songs. It works the same as that "radio" thing that you guys used to have. Remember? You'd hear a song on the radio (for free!), and then buy a vinyl record of the song.
As such, people would be buying less music without widespread file sharing.
Considering recorded music sales (including online) are down 58% since the inception of Napster, I would say that any claim that piracy helps is completely, totally debunked.
That's a very specific number. Where are you quoting it from?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sales are so far off, clearly SOMEONE isn't buying. Pointing to a narrow group and saying "they still buy, piracy isn't a problem" is utter bullshit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hey anonymous troll above me
Nigel
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hey anonymous troll above me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hey anonymous troll above me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I mean, that would just be silly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Do you want to make him sad?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Some real bright bulbs around here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Hey anonymous troll above me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
The rise of digital music sales, iTunes, etc. have allowed consumers to purchase singles instead of full albums.
Video gaming has exploded in popularity over the past decade.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
With all that extra disposable income that just magically came from where, exactly?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Hey anonymous troll above me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Research
It seems you need research in this area. Allow me to help you here:
Gaming - Valve - Piracy is a service issue
Notch - Piracy is not theft
Humble Indie Bundle - Still going strong even with torrents and downloads by illegitimate sites
Gog - Get rid of DRM, make customers happy
OC Remix - Giving away free entertainment for greater rewards
Movies - Michael D Smith - Lack of legal channels leads to piracy. Also, Notice the title of his paper
Crowdfunding is working for movies
Research - Piracy increases quality of content
The Copyright Wars - Seeing how increased litigation is affecting everyday American's lives and causing hyper awareness of the problem of copyright.
If you want, I could go further. But it seems to me that you may need to read a little bit more on piracy and copyright law.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
But when people look at the overall sales, apparently the industry has no problems since they grew every year since Napster is that not beautiful?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Research
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Instead I buy things like Skyrim.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Most 'pirates' are savvy enough to understand that buying a record or online download from a label-sponsored artist, almost nothing goes to the pocket of said artist. Most 'pirates' have enough grudges against the labels, that they don't want to be seen supporting those companies financially.
So, those 'pirates' then go to indies and buy from them.
Or wait till they can get a second-hand cd from somewhere. Because no money from that sale goes to the label.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
People only have so much disposable income to spend on media.
(if they have any at all)
And now you have a market where store-bought video games cost about 50 bucks a game, that's a lot of records you could buy. Though even that is a bit of a stretch, as the prices of most cds haven't gone down much since the introduction of the pressed cd.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
You want to make money make me pay for a ticket to a concert I will do it gladly... Oh... I'm sorry 90% of this "artists" can't perform live in a concert.
So on WTF am I spending money on???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Worldwide, recorded music sales (including) from from around 35 billion (2000) to slightly less than 15 billion (2010 using IFPI reports from each of those years). In some markets, increases in ticket prices (but not really attendance) to live shows has somewhat made up the gap, but it appears to be a short term deal, as in 2010 concert sales and ticket prices both took a turn for the toilet.
This would go against the "selling the scarce" theory that people would just take their recorded music money and instead pay for tickets. The reality appears to be more than the top acts were already doing as many dates as they could, and the only variable was ramping up ticket costs. What it has done is price them out of the reach of the average fan, breaking the cycle entirely.
I would love to see your source for numbers... so [citation needed}
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
It doesn't register anything for what they give away. that would be their problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Every person everywhere has an infinite amount of time and money. The only explanation for any downturn in music sales is greedy, basement-dwelling leeches and the ISPs that love them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
When you can't get in in some market do what big companies do, create a LLC and say you are indie.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
That may be difficult since the RIAA and the IFPI modified how they counted music sales, plus stopped publishing those numbers to the public.
But from the little sample that people can gather there is no problems with music lately apparently.
Since physical was offset by live.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
The numbers from 2006~2011
To get the older numbers you need to register with the IFPI and pay them, which is not going to happen, if they want to claim damages they should be posting those numbers all over the place instead they stopped public publication because people were finding discrepancies in their numbers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Spain, Greece, etc.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Total revenues have grown, apparently live shows even offset the loses in physical sales(i.e. CD's), also there are reasons why people stopped buying, first the major market for music started an "educational campaign"(i.e. suing customers), for some reason it was short lived and produced a very sharp decline in sales, a recession gripped the world and it is still ongoing, the financial crisis in the market plus outsourcing practically guaranteed that people don't have disposable income anymore, there are others things people pay attention now, music is just a commodity but unlike grains they are not vital or essential for human existence, people can't eat music, they can't wear music, they can't get warm from music on a cold night, so it is no surprise that maybe people are using the little money they still have to buy those other things you know those things that are important to survival.
Historically arts only flourish where there is a working class to support it, disposable income goes down so does expending on arts, so it is no surprise that even though Americans are buying less somewhere else in the world people are expending more on it and the total revenues globally keep growing and they grow in regions that have zero protections against piracy so piracy can't be the problem because one can even say that piracy is what is driving the growth in those markets, because they keep growing so fast.
Nollywood, Bollywood and China are just but a few of markets where there are no "protections" and they still see growth, the porn industry just proved that one can become big without any protections whatsoever, apparently nobody supports porn but everybody keeps consuming it.
You can't explain why in places where "piracy" the imaginary construct is rampant people can see phenomenal growth and I doubt you can explain why in industries where there is no protections whatsoever like in the restaurant business where everyone can copy a recipe from anyone mega corporations have emerged.
That is why you are full of shite.
That is why granting monopolies to people like you is just bad and evil, buskers should be able to use anything on the market to make a living, others artists should not have problems finding a place to play or have to pay another bum that does no real work but claim "intellectual property" on something. A monopoly that last life + 95 years is not only absurd is just immoral, the little details like control over derivatives are a barrier and a threat to business everywhere and so is the fraking "non-literal-copying" crap that basically blurred what is legal and what is not making it almost impossible to have any certainty or safety in what one does, is so risky that every artists should open a LLC to try and shield themselves from all the full burden of liabilities that plague the place, which of course exclude any small "guy" out there and when people use it you muppets scream foul play. That is not to talk about fiscal paradises that normal US citizens don't even know what they are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Hey anonymous troll above me
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
Here, for example, the AC above you is clearly noting that there's a lot more money going into other industries that compete with music (games and home video markets are demonstrably far more lucrative than they were 15 years ago), while also noting that unbundling has led to albums being far less popular than they once were.
You seem to think that this means that he's saying that those industries were suddenly invented and that albums aren't made.
One of you is an idiot, and I'm afraid it's not him.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
oh wait, no they haven't.
Oh wait, yes they have.
Unless you mean "record" literally, and are talking about vinyl albums. Sales of vinyl have gone up too.
Obviously, you are on the usual Friday troll for Saturday comments. Stale.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sales are NOT down
Music purchases are not down, and have never gone down:
Music Purchases and Net Revenue For Artists Are Up, Gross Revenue for Labels is Down
A Big Music Year for Jackson, Boyle, Swift, Digital Downloads… and Vinyl?
Broken Records: Music Sales for Albums and Digital Tracks up in First Half of 2011
What has declined is profits from music purchases. This has nothing to do with fewer purchases, but the type of purchases that are made. More people are buying digital tracks, and more people are buying them a la carte rather than as complete albums.
In other words, what has caused the decline in music profits is not lack of sales, not piracy, but the shift from physical media to the digital format, and the "de-bundling" of songs from albums.
And, by the way, which consumers spend the most money on digital music? That's right, the pirates:
Downloading 'myths' challenged
Gov't Commissioned Study Finds P2P Downloaders Buy More Music
Study finds file-sharers buy ten times more music
Illegal downloaders 'spend the most on music', says poll
Naturally, labels and studios are trying to bury this fact:
Movie industry buries report proving pirates are great consumers
Pirates Are The Music Industry’s Most Valuable Customers
Now, obviously, nobody can claim that the increase in purchases was due to piracy. It's likely that people pirate and purchase for the same reason: they simply value music more than others.
But there's no evidence that they would make more purchases if piracy was not an option.
And if your goal is to encourage them to continue valuing music, treating them like "parasites" and "criminals" is exactly the wrong way to do it. In fact, the severe decline in music profits began only after Napster was shut down (purchases - and profits - increased between 1999-2001), and the lawsuits against file sharers became widespread news.
So, the severe actions against file sharers almost certainly hurt the labels' bottom line more than file sharing did in the first place. For them, the solution was worse than the problem - just like it was for everyone else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It was free music, from the customer's point of view.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Because if they want their piece of that pie, they'd have to pay ludicrous membership fees, so it's not really worth their while to make claim to that money.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The labels are deathly afraid that you're going to buy from independent artists instead of the artists that the labels approve off.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Kind of sucks. It looks like a great game, the developers seem to be nice people, but their legal dept is a bunch of douches like most other ones are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
There have been some wonderful music made in just the last year but the pop music tends to be a one hit wonder or just bad.
What confuses me is that, almost everyone I know buys music (Mostly off iTunes instead of a Wallmart, etc.) and that should be making someone happy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2010/01/overall-music-purchases-hit-an-alltime-hig h-in-2009.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]