DailyDirt: To The Moon, Alice!

from the urls-we-dig-up dept

The Earth's moon seems like a nice place to visit, but there are a surprising number of people who seem to want to go there permanently. Manned spaceflight has seen better days, but is it really time to invest in a moon colony now? The land is pretty cheap up there, and no one's making any more of it... but there's a tiny problem of getting there. Here are just a few more links about manned trips to the moon. By the way, StumbleUpon can also recommend some good Techdirt articles, too.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: apollo, lunar base, manned spaceflight, moon, newt gingrich, orion, space
Companies: nasa


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 5:12pm

    BEtter question

    What would NASA have accomplished if it had never had the space shuttle program?! NASA could have established a moon base already if it hadn't been distracted by nonsense re-usable spacecraft.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    abc gum, 31 Jan 2012 @ 5:15pm

    Ignoring the financial disencentives .... there are many technical problems associated with establishing a permanent base upon the moon.

    Solar Flare - lack of a large electromagnetic field can be detrimental to ones health.

    Incoming - What does one do when an asteroid is heading in your general direction? Keep in mind that a direct hit is not necessary in order to ruin your day, and there is no atmosphere to slow it down.

    Dust - pesky little bits of rock get into everything and cause a real mess.

    Resupply - the bare essentials will not last long, what does one do when, not if, the resupply is delayed.

    I'm sure there are many more ....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Pixelation, 31 Jan 2012 @ 5:16pm

    "Experts say Gingrich moon base dreams not lunacy"

    We could send the entertainment industry execs up there where no one can pirate from them. Win/win!

    Hopefully a massive explosion will knock it out of orbit into deep space!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    abc gum, 31 Jan 2012 @ 5:19pm

    Re: BEtter question

    "nonsense re-usable spacecraft."

    Not sure what you mean by nonsense. Perhaps you should review what was accomplished by that program.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 5:49pm

    Without Patents

    I wonder where they would be if patents hadn't existed?

    Or, an alternate question, what difficulties did they encounter because of patents?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 7:18pm

    Are you so sure the Apollo program really made it to the moon?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    WulfTheSaxon (profile), 31 Jan 2012 @ 7:54pm

    If anybody’s interested in more about our return to beyond low earth orbit, I highly recommend this site: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/news/constellation/

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 8:32pm

    I really wish someone would focus on building a space elevator.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    Josh (profile), 31 Jan 2012 @ 8:33pm

    Returning to the moon is a horrible idea. Haven't you seen Apollo 18?

    What we should do is build a space elevator.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 10:15pm

    Re:

    "Incoming - What does one do when an asteroid is heading in your general direction? Keep in mind that a direct hit is not necessary in order to ruin your day, and there is no atmosphere to slow it down."

    Conversely, there's no atmosphere to carry a shock wave or create a "nuclear winter" dust cloud around the moon.
    Only a direct or near-direct (within 5 miles or so) impact would affect a moonbase.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jan 2012 @ 10:17pm

    Re:

    "I really wish someone would focus on building a space elevator."

    Progressively-more violent weather conditions make such a project unfeasible with current tech.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    Joseph B, 31 Jan 2012 @ 10:21pm

    Moon Technology

    Here's a scary thought - your iPhone has more computer power than the Apollo spacecraft that flew to the moon and back.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. identicon
    cg15, 31 Jan 2012 @ 10:38pm

    Moving on Moon

    Moving on Moon sounds wonderful,but the technology can't permit yet~

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 1 Feb 2012 @ 12:01am

    Re: Re: BEtter question

    Hmm. The shuttle program was pretty cool, but other than showing off that it could be useful in satellite repairwork (eg. the Hubble repair missions) -- I'm not sure what the shuttle program did that a non-reusable rocket system couldn't have done. (And the shuttle wasn't really that reusable since it needed to have its entire heat shield rebuilt after every mission!)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Feb 2012 @ 2:54am

    Space colony

    Wouldn't an orbital space colony be a better idea than a moon base? A Bernal sphere, or possibly an O'Neill cylinder?

    A space colony would have zero-gravity manufacturing capability, and provide an Earth-like environment.
    A moon base would have neither of those advantages. Everyone who lived there would atrophy from the constant low gravity.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    abc gum, 1 Feb 2012 @ 4:31am

    Re: Re: Re: BEtter question

    That may or may not be a valid point, however use of the word nonsense is in this case nonsense.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    abc gum, 1 Feb 2012 @ 4:39am

    Re: Re:

    "Only a direct or near-direct (within 5 miles or so) impact would affect a moonbase."

    Shock waves travel quite nicely through the ground, and the moon is not immune to the adverse affects of ejecta.

    Your five mile number is based upon what size of object, and made up of what type of material? This can make a difference. Regardless, what would one do - jump in the moon buggy and high tail it outta there? Based upon our present day capabilities, one would get very little notice prior to impact. Maybe enough time to kiss your ass goodbye.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. identicon
    abc gum, 1 Feb 2012 @ 4:52am

    Re: Without Patents

    Abstract Ideas Can’t Be Patented. Or Can They?
    http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/abstract-ideas-cant-be-patented-or-can-they/

    Procedure for generating operational ballistic capture transfer
    http://www.google.com/patents/US6278946

    Free return lunar flyby transfer method for geosynchronous satellites
    http://www.google.com/patents/US6116545

    There are more .......

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    Wolfy, 1 Feb 2012 @ 5:07am

    If The Soviet Union would have made it ti the Moon first,WE WOULD ALL BE SPEAKING RUSSIAN. Period.

    No two ways about it. If the Soviets had "the high ground", they would have used the military advantage to subjugate the rest of the world.

    They could have just thrown lunar boulders at any country that defied them. The result of such impacts would be similar to an asteroidal impact. It wouldn't take any more technology to do that, than they would have already developed to get there.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  20. icon
    wildcomputerwife (profile), 1 Feb 2012 @ 5:15am

    mooning ...

    "does not compute ... DANGER! WILL ROBERTSON! DANGER! it's Newt Gingrich"

    link to this | view in thread ]

  21. identicon
    alan smithee, 1 Feb 2012 @ 5:40am

    Re: Re: Re: BEtter question

    Michael,
    I believe that many of the shuttle parts were refurbed after every mission, but the "entire heat shield" was not rebuilt. It was inspected.

    Every individual tile was examined for any damage and suspect tiles were replaced as well as any gap fillers or parts designed to be replaced. Certainly a tedious process, but not the same as rebuilding the entire underside of the shuttle.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  22. icon
    Gene Cavanaugh (profile), 1 Feb 2012 @ 9:01am

    When you consider the expense ....

    So long as the money supply of the middle class continues to be siphoned away in the "No New Taxes" (aka Welfare for the Wealthy) programs, spending that much money on a "grand gesture" (which, by the way, likely gains votes in Florida, where the space program is centered) IS lunacy, no matter what space program advocates say.
    Increase the money supply for the middle class, by bringing the money back from the one percent, and then we can consider it (though I believe it would still be a bad idea).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  23. icon
    Michael Ho (profile), 1 Feb 2012 @ 12:45pm

    Re: Re: Re: Re: BEtter question

    okay, "rebuilt" is a bit more extreme than "inspected and refurbished" -- but if anyone has the cost comparisons for the refurbish process versus building a new Soyuz system (or an expendable rocket), it'd be interesting to see how much the shuttle's refurbs could have reallocated to build expendable launch systems.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Space_Shuttle_program

    link to this | view in thread ]

  24. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Feb 2012 @ 2:49pm

    Re:

    And if the British had won the Revolutionary War, WE WOULD ALL BE SPEAKING ENGLISH. Period.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  25. identicon
    abc gum, 1 Feb 2012 @ 4:12pm

    Re:

    LOL - Wut ???

    This is funny, regardless of sincerity.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  26. identicon
    Anonymous Anonymous Coward, 1 Feb 2012 @ 7:30pm

    Re:

    Of course. Mythbusters proved it. What more could you ask?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  27. identicon
    nihs, 16 Apr 2012 @ 2:56am

    Recently i have heard about James Koehler. As i have never heard about him. I have gone through his site that was just too good. He has done just amazing impressive work. Its really good job of him. Everyone can inspire from him. 10k training

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.