EU Commissioner Kroes: Copyright Is 'A Tool To Punish And Withhold'; New Business Models, Not More Enforcement Needed
from the she-really-gets-it dept
Neelie Kroes is that rare thing: a politician who actually seems to understand digital technologies. Before she became the European Commissioner for Digital Agenda, her current post, she was European Commissioner for Competition, and in that capacity made a speech about open standards in 2008 that included the following interesting statements:It is simplistic to assume that because some intellectual property protection is good, that such protection should therefore be absolute in all circumstances.and
if we extend intellectual property protection for technology, then we should only do so when it is justified under intellectual property principles, i.e. on the basis of evidence that such extension will lead to more innovations and will therefore promote consumer welfare.Those comments were about problems with the patent system, and now Kroes has brought her frankness to bear on copyright:
let's ask ourselves, is the current copyright system the right and only tool to achieve our objectives? Not really, I'm afraid. We need to keep on fighting against piracy, but legal enforceability is becoming increasingly difficult; the millions of dollars invested trying to enforce copyright have not stemmed piracy. Meanwhile citizens increasingly hear the word copyright and hate what is behind it. Sadly, many see the current system as a tool to punish and withhold, not a tool to recognise and reward.That's pretty stunning stuff for an EU Commissioner to be saying, given the European Commission's whole-hearted support for ACTA, and its plans for IPRED 2. Kroes goes on:
We need to go back to basics and put the artist at the centre, not only of copyright law, but of our whole policy on culture and growth. In times of change, we need creativity, out-of-the-box thinking: creative art to overcome this difficult period and creative business models to monetise the art. And for this we need flexibility in the system, not the straitjacket of a single model. The platforms, channels and business models by which content is produced, distributed and used can be as varied and innovative as the content itself.Again, that focus on new business models rather than ever-more punitive copyright enforcement is a refreshing recognition by a very senior European politician of the real problem facing the creative industries: their failure to adapt to the vastly-different business landscape created by the Internet. Kroes picks up on that theme in her conclusion:
There are many new ideas out there – ideas, for example, like extended collective licensing as practised in Scandinavia, or other ideas that seek to both legitimise and monetise certain uses of works. Are these ideas the right ones to achieve our goals? I don't know. But too often we can't even try them out because of some old set of rules made for a different age – whether it is the Berne Convention, the legislation exceptions and limitations on the VAT Directive or some other current law. So new ideas which could benefit artists are killed before they can show their merit, dead on arrival. This needs to change.It's tremendously good news that Kroes has not only recognized these problems but is prepared to articulate them publicly. It suggests that at least someone within the European Commission gets it. Too bad, then, that Kroes seems to be as exceptional in that respect as in her grasp of the underlying digital technologies that are driving these huge changes.
I can't set out for you now what the model should be and indeed it's not the kind of model that should be developed from the centre. Rather we need to create a framework in which a model – or indeed several models – can develop organically, flexibly, in ways that support artists.
I see how some European stakeholders see with horror the arrival of Netflix, or the expansion of iTunes. We need to react, not to be paralysed by fear. Let's take chances. As Zygmunt Bauman put it, "the function of culture is not to satisfy existing needs, but to create new ones".
So that's my answer: it's not all about copyright. It is certainly important, but we need to stop obsessing about that. The life of an artist is tough: the crisis has made it tougher. Let's get back to basics, and deliver a system of recognition and reward that puts artists and creators at its heart.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, copyright, europe, neelie kroes, tools
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"According to her husband, Bram Peper, from 1993 to 2001 Kroes relied on astrologers and clairvoyants for personal and business advice. Until 2004 Kroes maintained an office in the castle of Jan-Dirk Paarlberg, a real estate mogul who was convicted to four and a half years in prison for money-laundering and extortion. One of the astrologers advising Kroes during that time was Lenie Drent, who had been providing business advice to Paarlberg for decades."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Solder of Orange
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
And they don't outsource a single thing!
America should learn from them!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
According to her EX-husband...
she occasionally frequented astrologers and clairvoyants.
(Did it work? Did she make money?)
She had an office in a building owned by a convicted money-launderer.
(I lived in a building owned by a drug dealer. And no, I didn't buy/sell/do drugs.)
The building's owner used one of the astrologers she used.
(And..."guilt by association" is back in fashion?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We're quick in with the Ad-Hominem's aren't we!
Got any real arguments?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If you can name a single film produced by a country where the main language is not English and having a population no bigger than that of the Netherlands then you might have the beginnings of a point.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Quick, name a country, anywhere, who's entire economy revolves around the film and music industries.
Oh wait. You can't. I believe the figure is somewhere less than 0.5% of the GDP for any given country.
G Thompson spells it out much more eloquently than I could here.
So in light of all that, what was your point again?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Quick, name a country, anywhere, who's entire economy revolves around the film and music industries.
Oh wait. You can't. I believe the figure is somewhere less than 0.5% of the GDP for any given country.
G Thompson spells it out much more eloquently than I could here.
So in light of all that, what was your point again?
Sorry, what percent of pirated content is Dutch? Something like .0000000001%?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Ahhh. I get what you are saying here, since the percentage of pirated content that is Dutch is low, they shouldn't get any say in the matter.
I don't agree with that at all, but let's carry that line of thinking out further.
Since the film and music industry only represent less than 1% GDP of the economy, their opinions on breaking the internet should be ignored and minimized also, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I suggest you try telling the Dutch anti-piracy outfit (Brein) not to bother then - because they obviously don't have anything worth protecting - so they can all go home. I'd be very happy if they took your advice - because they have been one of the most aggressive players in Europe in recent years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Damn... their goes my whole troll reputation... *grumbles*
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Oh yes of course.. 4.48% (US census data divided by 7 billion).
And of that only 0.4% is part of the Film/Television/Music Industry making a total (lets be generous) of 0.018% of the worlds actual output/value.
So Seeing as how the actual Industry you are trying to protect is really only a small subset of the actual FTM Industry (producing/recording sector) then well yes of course your protection you seek under these new laws and mindsets is ethically and morally just..
For an egotistical power hungry control freak who is in the last stages of it's death throws that is
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I didn't know Philips or Shell made any of those.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Envious much
I'll speak up for my country because you seem stunningly ignorant about us.
I'll have you know The Netherlands has a very nicely stable economy that is still showing some (small) growth, even in these difficult times. I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you're American. How high was your unemployment again? 9% and going up? In NL it's lower than 5%, we have a reasonably balanced state budget plus we have very good universal health care and unemployment benefits etc. Additionally you might want to check the Dutch stock exchange because you might recognise some names there.
So, please fix your own FFing country before dissing us because if anything is depressing our economy it's the mess YOU made. /Rant
On an interesting note: Kroes is actually considered quite right wing in the Dutch politacl spectrum ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Envious much
I also dislike those who want the US to be insanely imperialistic and force our laws upon the rest of the world. As you can tell from TechDirt, there are quite a few of us who try to fight it.
So again, sorry for the jerks of America and the messes they have caused around the world.
- A level headed American
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Envious much
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Envious much
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Envious much
I'll speak up for my country because you seem stunningly ignorant about us.
I'll have you know The Netherlands has a very nicely stable economy that is still showing some (small) growth, even in these difficult times. I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you're American. How high was your unemployment again? 9% and going up? In NL it's lower than 5%, we have a reasonably balanced state budget plus we have very good universal health care and unemployment benefits etc. Additionally you might want to check the Dutch stock exchange because you might recognise some names there.
So, please fix your own FFing country before dissing us because if anything is depressing our economy it's the mess YOU made. /Rant
On an interesting note: Kroes is actually considered quite right wing in the Dutch politacl spectrum ;-)
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Go surrender to Germany or something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We are the cheese-making, pot-smoking, windmilling, wooden shoe wearing tulip farmers.
btw, nice smear campaign there, who's paying you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
We are the cheese-making, pot-smoking, windmilling, wooden shoe wearing tulip farmers.
btw, nice smear campaign there, who's paying you?
Belgium..... Holland... pretty much the same thing. Insanely dull socialist states. Were it not for legal drugs and prostitution in Holland, it would enjoy the level of international recognition as Vanuatu.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
(See what I did there?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Doesn't that suggest they may have got something right?
Holland is insanely dull? I take it you don't travel much?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
and explain why believing in astrology & clairvoyancy is any different to any other faith/religion that either believes in some Invisible Space Zombie, or Flying Spagetti Monster.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Are you an idiot or a troll? Anti-copyright?
"...some intellectual property protection is good...We need to keep on fighting against piracy...We need to go back to basics and put the artist at the centre, not only of copyright law, but of our whole policy on culture and growth...[Copyright] is certainly important..."
And that was just from Techdirt's quotes, there may be more in her full text.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misquote in the Title
You titled your post to indicate that the politician said copywrite is a tool to punish and withold. When in fact the direct quote is, "Sadly, many see the current system as a tool to punish and withold..."
She is not agreeing with that belief, she is not saying that those are her beliefs. To the contrary, she specifically says that it is regretfull that some people feel that way.
D- Title Fail
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Misquote in the Title
She is not agreeing with that belief, she is not saying that those are her beliefs. To the contrary, she specifically says that it is regretfull that some people feel that way.
It's not clear that the source of her regret is the opinions of the "some people" or the actions of the authorities and copyright holders that have created those opinions, or simply that the situation has arisen. My reading is that it is one of the latter two.
Of course, given her current position as a European civil servant (not an elected politician) it would be improper for her to express her own opinions anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Misquote in the Title
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The *people* should be the center, not the artists
While I agree with the general principle that we shouldn't lock ourselves into the current IP model, I think the mess we have today with IP is a direct result of the hyper-focus on the artist over the interests of the population as a whole. The artist should not be at the center of any country's IP policy. Not only is it too easy for content industry to corrupt the system in the name of the artists, the system was not set up for the benefits of the artists. Benefiting the artists is a means to an end, not then end itself. Should we do our best to maximize justice for artists under any system? Sure, but this is a secondary goal, not central goal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Summary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Summary
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Idle talk
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lots of dutch music gets pirated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truth, and a glimmer of the big truth.
This shit's got to go, in the words of Jacque Fresco.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
These laws should not be to 'recognize and reward' they should be to promote the progress and serve a public good. They've turned into something else and I say we abolish them. ABOLISH IP!!!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]