Can A Company Keep An Employee's LinkedIn Account After They're No Longer Employed?
from the how-does-that-make-sense dept
Venkat Balasubramani has the story of a bizarre fight between a company, Sawabeh Information Services, and the founders of Edcomm, a company that Sawabeh bought in 2010. A few months later, the founders of Edcomm were fired, and the lawsuits commenced. There are a variety of issues here, and Venkat's post goes through most of them in detail, but I wanted to focus on just one: the fight over who gets to control Dr. Linda Eagle's LinkedIn account. Eagle was one of the founders of Edcomm and the key figure in this fight. Sawabeh claims that Eagle "misappropriated" her own LinkedIn account and the contacts associated with it, by continuing to use it after being fired.While I can kind of understand some of the legal fights over who gets to control Twitter accounts, the entire point of a LinkedIn account is to represent an individual and their job history. How would it possibly make sense for a company to control an ex-employee's LinkedIn account?
The company seems to think that the LinkedIn account was more like a rolodex. Because (for reasons that are beyond me), Eagle had let others in the company access and manage her account, as soon as she was fired, people at the company accessed her account and then changed her "name" and profile picture to someone else at the company. That would be pretty shocking for her connections, who might not know who the guy was at all. They also tried to do this with the account of one of the other fired founders, but they didn't have his password. Apparently the company asked LinkedIn to hand over the password, and LinkedIn, properly, told the company to get lost.
Either way, the court digs into the "misappropriation" question with the LinkedIn account and refuses to dismiss it out of hand (at this stage of the case), which seems too bad. However, there's an unclear issue of who "developed" the contacts in the account:
The Counterclaim Complaint expressly alleges that, with respect to the LinkedIn account connections and content, "Edcomm personnel, not Dr. Eagle, developed and maintained all connections and much of the content on the LinkedIn Account, actions that were taken solely at Edcomm’s expense and exclusively for its own benefit." ... While Plaintiff argues that Edcomm fails to allege facts that would show that it made a substantial investment of time, effort, and money into creating the cell phone number or LinkedIn account, Edcomm counters that its employees developed the accounts and maintained the connections, which are the route through which Edcomm contacts instructors and specific personnel within its clients. As these conflicting allegations create an issue of fact requiring further discovery, the Court must deny the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to the misappropriation counterclaim.Of course, I wonder if they're arguing about the wrong thing here. If the company developed the contacts, perhaps it has a right to ask for a copy of the contacts, but the account itself seems like it should belong to Eagle. Part of the problem here is the idea that contacts are some scarce resource. Both parties can have them, and the simplest thing would be, if there is a legitimate claim that the company developed those relationships, to require that their contact info be provided to the company -- but leave the account in the hands of Eagle.
Either way, the case should be a warning for any company that wants to control the LinkedIn accounts of its employees.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: contacts, linda eagle, ownership, social media
Companies: edcomm, linkedin, sawabeh information services, siscom
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Or, perhaps a little closer to the linked in example, many states have laws that will allow people to claim ownership over property (land, in this example) they have maintained for a certain period of time with the knowledge and (tacit?) approval of the property owner. I forget what the legal term is, but it does exist.
Common-law marriages, if still on the books in any states, are perhaps another example.
I believe there have also been court cases where a person sues a former housemate who allowed them to live in the house without a rental agreement due to a "relationship" getting a certain percentage of ownership awarded to them because they were able to show spending time and money maintaining/improving the property.
I guess my point is be careful of anything that may be interpreted as sharing or giving up ownership rights.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That will backfire both with the Judge and Likedin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Linkdin
There is no way to contact them as I've looked online so this type of behavior is not surprising. As to who owns the account now in question in the above story I'd say it still belongs to the original account owner, Dr. Eagle, Sawabeh has no right to that account or the information contained therein as it was created by Dr. Eagle BEFORE the company was bought out and the original founders fired. Their (Sawabeh) removing of her name and profile picture to be replaced with someone else from the company is nothing short of fraud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Linkdin
Yes. Well, we lost the spam war.
You should be able to blacklist LinkedIn at your inbox. If not, then just go whitelist-only. You really don't need email from strangers, do you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Linkdin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Linkdin
Then whitelist: Family, friends, work. The odds are that you have less than 400 people in your immediate contacts.
( If you have the right social circle, then the first, easiest cut is to /dev/null anything that isn't PGP/GPG or S/MIME. You need a select group of friends and cow-orkers for that, though. )
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Linkdin
If your spam rules aren't working it sounds like you need a new email provider.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Because corporations are now people, do all Sawabeh employees go to jail?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An unusual case
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An unusual case
"They also tried to do this with the account of one of the other fired founders, but they didn't have his password. Apparently the company asked LinkedIn to hand over the password, and LinkedIn, properly, told the company to get lost. "
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Introducing JobChangeAlert for LinkedIn iPhone app
Get to know when your connection gets promoted, starts their own company, joins a new company or retires from their job.
http://bit.ly/sYlzzN
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Introducing JobChangeAlert for LinkedIn iPhone app
I wish people like you and your "friends" at LinkedIn would all just dig a nice big hole next to an active volcano, climb in and pull the hole in after you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Former Employee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Former Employee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Former Employee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Another former employee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Another former employee
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]