Protip: Make Sure Your Facebook Photos Don't Contradict Your Statements In Court...
from the just-saying dept
In my long-running series of litigants saying one thing in court and another when talking to their friends online, consider this from a worker's comp case after a refrigerator fell on Clement:The first issue Clement raises in his brief is whether pictures of him that appeared on Facebook and MySpace should have been admitted into evidence. He complains that the pictures �are a disgrace to the dignity of the workers' compensation proceedings and the legal system� and have nothing to do with his medical treatment....
We find no abuse of discretion in the allowance of the photographs. Clement contended that he was in excruciating pain, but these pictures show him drinking and partying. Certainly these pictures could have a bearing on Clement's credibility, albeit a negative effect that Clement might not wish to be demonstrated to the ALJ or the Commission. We hold that there was not an abuse of discretion in allowing the photographs.
Now that Facebook can do facial recognition, it should next develop a tool to detect photos depicting alcoholic drinks and give users a way to automatically opt-out of those photos!
Prior blog posts in this series:
* YouTube Video Impeaches Witness' Credibility--Ensign Yacht v. Arrigoni
* Facebook Entries Negate Car Crash Victims' Physical Injury Claims
* Contrary MySpace Evidence Strikes a Litigant Again--HAC, Inc. v. Box
* MySpace Postings Foil Another Litigant--Sedie v. U.S.
* Disturbingly Humorous MySpace Posts Used as Impeaching Evidence in Spousal Abuse Case--Embry v. State
* Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. Franco
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: contradictions, photos, social networks
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I am speaking from experience.
Not go away completely, but less, bearable. Guess we can all work while inebriated now.
Cheers!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/01/24/bc-facebook-icbc.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6979042/3D_Printable_Chris_Dodd_with_AACS_Encryption_Key
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jerkwads
Thanks for fucking that one up Facebook. Jerkwads.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
We all know that the US Government LOVES Facebook.
Facebook + Stupid Cow People = Information and control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Too easy to abuse
Unless he was lifting the keg??
I mean, if he can't do any strenuous physical work and a doctor backs him up, admitting those pictures is a dick move that proves nothing and serves only to influence a judge through innuendo rather than actual evidence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Too easy to abuse
For example, if I were to be laid up in bed, for whatever reason, but I was capable of moving one arm to use a computer, I would probably spend the time updating my social network, making WoW videos, etc.
Since I didn't RTFA, if the pics were taken prior to the injury, and he used the time off to upload the pics, then I don't see how they could be used.
Plus, they aren't counting the fact that sometimes you can feel well enough to be at work, and the DR won't release you yet. They do this as a means to not get a malpractice suit against them....and you can get in trouble if you do go to work.
I remember a friend that had gotten in a bike wreck that did get taken to a party by his friends. He was bruised up, arm in a cast, sitting on the couch being fed drinks. He was in no way, shape or form, able to go to work, if anything because of the pain medication.....(why my dumb friends fed him alcohol, I'll never know....I wasn't there..he's lucky he didn't have a reaction...)
I remember after my hysterectomy that I forced myself to go to my kids school event. I made it a whole 30 min, before I had to be carried out to the car, because I was in so much pain and the stiches started bleeding.
However, if someone would have snapped a pic of the whole classroom with me there, I'm sure it would have looked bad to others. I ended up having to go back to the DR the next day, because I had no business being out and about. My kids were 4 and 5, and they were so excited about this event, I had to go.
There is a fine line between being capable of doing some tasks, and putting in a full 8 hrs at work.
2 weeks after getting home from the hospital after an aortic aneurysm, my mom was up trying to do laundry. We immediately grabbed her and stuffed her back into bed. Where is that fine line between "you need to get up and about to get back to health vs omg you are jimmying the system"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't lie
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When the pain started getting bad, she took a pain management workshop and was given the advice that she shouldn't stop doing things she loves b/c she's in pain. She'll be in pain either way, so she might as well do things she likes so that she'll have some joy in life. Good advice if you ask me.
This case is basically saying the opposite of that. If you are in pain, do not go out and enjoy yourself b/c then people will think you're not in pain and you can lose your compensation. Why should someone wallow in pain that leads to depression only b/c if heaven forbid they go out and enjoy themselves someone might post a picture on Facebook and it could come back and bite them later.
I feel that's unacceptable. People who live in pain every day need to come to terms with it and move past it. Doing nothing doesn't make the pain go away, but it can make you depressed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I don't think your example is relevant. She's not claiming she's too sick to work and then going to a party, she's told to keep living her life as close to normal as she can. Which would presumably include working. It's just not the same situation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He just needs a better lawyer...
"these pictures show him drinking and partying"
Exactly, this just further proves my client's case that he is unable to have enjoyment in most situations. And requires continual medication to alleviate and dampen the constant pain. Be that medication prescription, or alcohol, a chemical known to the medical community to function as a pain inhibitor.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
On the whole people are too obsessive about the social nets. That disturbs me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]