Will 'Clipart Covers' Find Itself Staring Down The Barrel Of A Lawsuit?
from the next-idea?-using-clipart-to-recreate-iconic-stock-photos dept
Every time you think the internet has already covered every possible iteration of everything, up pops something new. The current frontrunner for the "Best New Internet Thing of the Immediate Future*" is Clipart Covers, which does exactly what it says on the tin: it recreates album covers using only clipart and, apparently, Comic Sans.*"Immediate future" defined as anywhere from 30 nanoseconds to one week.
Here are a couple of examples:
Très amusant, non? Just a little friendly derivative artwork with no greater purpose than a few lols. But is it actionable?
Good question. The site creator has even avoided the potentially litigious pitfall of hosting the original artwork for comparison and it would seem that the artwork here is transformative enough to avoid legal action and would definitely fall under most people's definition of "fair use." In fact, it would even fall under one legal interpretation of fair use, specifically Blanch vs. Koons, in which the court stated that Koons' use of a fashion photo "added something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message."
Which brings us to the handcrafted term "Maiseling"... As Techdirt readers will surely recall, a re-done album cover touched off an internet shit storm a few months ago. An 8-bit remake of the album cover for Miles Davis' "Kind of Blue" turned into a lose-lose situation for Waxy.org's Andy Baio, who settled with album cover photographer Jay Maisel rather than risking a much larger amount attempting to have a court recognize it for what it was: fair use.
It's entirely possible that the creator of Clipart Covers will never face legal action for
And I'm sure the critics will be (s)trolling through the comment threads soon enough, throwing around words like "ripoff" and "uncreative," and citing their unproven ability to create art in a vacuum. To them I say, if you want people to "respect" copyright, you need to treat it as a tool for the common good rather than a pecuniary weapon. You also need to realize that when people put together something like Clipart Covers, they're not doing it to flaunt copyright or disrepect the original artists. They're doing it to be part of a shared cultural experience, something aggressive copyright holders seem to actively disdain.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: album covers, clipart, copyright, covers, fair use, maisel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seems fair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fair Use Test?
I suppose as a safe test we could use public domain images, although I'm sure it would only be a matter of time before UMG starts sending out the DMCA takedown notices. ;)
Thoughts?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Fair Use Test?
I have no idea what it’s like to be on the receiving end of a lawsuit. But every experience I have read about (here on Techdirt and elsewhere) shows that it is basically a life-destroying experience. No wonder most reasonable people would rather give in than fight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Fair Use Test?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Fair Use Test?
Additionally, I have the unpleasant suspicion that if you had such a case and it got to where you might get a nice clear litmus test type ruling the other side would throw irresistible amounts of money at you to make you settle.
Copyright maximists would do anything to keep fair use obfuscated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just Trolling
/challengeaccepted
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
well clearly 'he' won't as the page clearly says it is by a woman!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]