Pfizer Dinged For Antitrust Activities In Trying To Block Generic Drug Competition In Italy
from the ah,-patents dept
Italy only established patents for pharmaceuticals in 1978. Prior to that, it had a thriving pharmaceutical business with a ton of companies. The country was a net exporter of drugs. While many of the firms there did focus on making generics, there was significant drug discovery and R&D happening in Italy at the time as well. However, due in large part to pressure from the big international pharmaceutical firms, Italy eventually established patent protection for drugs as well. Following that, there was massive consolidation in the Italian pharmaceutical market. The country went from being a leader to just another player, and the big international pharma companies took over and to this day dominate the Italian market.That's a bit of interesting background for the fact that the Italian antitrust authority recently found drug giant Pfizer guilty of abusing antitrust law in the country to try to delay or block competition from generic drugs. According to the report linked here, Pfizer was specifically called out on two points:
1. the artificial extension of the Xalatan patent in Italy by means of: a) the application of a divisional patent; b) the validation of the divisional patent in Italy; c) the application for an SPC in Italy; d) the application for pediatric extension; andPfizer is expected to appeal, and the blog post linked here (from law firm DLA Piper) suggests that it has a decent chance of having the original ruling reversed. But, really, that's quite a change in just a few decades. From being a leader in the market -- often by building on the ability to produce generics -- to one where cheaper generics (which help keep people healthy in a more affordable way) are aggressively blocked from the market by activities of giant multinational pharma companies.
2. the start of litigations aimed at discouraging or increasing the costs for the marketing of latanoprost generic products in Italy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: antitrust, italy, pharmaceutical
Companies: pfizer
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Big pharma is evil!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big pharma is evil!
Really, one could use this an example as to WHY copyright and patents need to be scaled back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big pharma is evil!
Then where would our leaders get jobs once they leave office? They're mostly too dumb to legitimately get jobs, no one would hire them, so they must rely on the revolving door. Think of the poor politicians!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Big pharma is evil!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now you've just given them all this monopoly money to play with. So the next thing they do is use it to remove the limitations on the monopoly. How is that not piracy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After all, it's not as simple as giving people access to medicine, is it?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But, But, Patents!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
He's got Chris Dodd for that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Virginia Air
[ link to this | view in chronology ]