Zenimax Files For Trademark On A Skyrim Internet Meme
from the arrow-to-the-knee dept
We are all aware of the aggressive nature of Bethesda parent company Zenimax when it comes to trademarks. We now learn that it is not only aggressive in defense of its trademarks but is also an aggressive filer of trademarks for things surrounding its properties. Fusible is reporting that Zenimax has recently filed 6 different trademark applications covering a variety of uses of the phrase "Fus Ro Dah".For those of you not in the know, "Fus Ro Dah" is a phrase spoken by characters in the Bethesda game Skyrim when casting a spell that sends a blast of energy knocking back anything in its path. For those Star Wars buffs out there, it is very similar to a Jedi Force Push. This spell has spawned its very own meme using both in game footage of the spell use and the use of the phrase just before real people fall on video, as can be seen here:
While we are not entirely sure of Zenimax's true intentions, we do know that due to the ownership culture we have in the US many companies want control over anything related or somewhat related to their properties. This protectionist attitude is probably the primary driver of this move. Zenimax most likely feels that since this meme is based on one of its properties, it should have sole control over its use.
Unfortunately, this move to trademark a meme can actually result in its premature death. Memes are born in the wild and are best able to grow and spread if left to the whims and wiles of those on the internet. Memes cannot be controlled or tamed. If Zenimax's trademark filing is approved, the moment it makes its first move toward control, such as sending a cease and desist or taking down a video, it will feel a backlash by fans of Skyrim. If Zenimax had anyone capable of rational thought running its operation, it would have left this meme be and sat back and enjoyed the free advertising it provides for one of its games.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: fus ro dah, games, meme, skyrim
Companies: bethesda, zenimax
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
More plausible explanation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More plausible explanation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: More plausible explanation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: More plausible explanation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: More plausible explanation
http://www.cafepress.com/+fus-ro-dah+t-shirts
Just one example. There are many many more out there.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can haz trademark?
Seems a little late. Memes are by their very nature short lived (Chuck Norris aside). But that's what happens when you feed your lawyers after midnight.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can haz trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: I can haz trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: I can haz trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I can haz trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I can haz trademark?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DL4vR3PB2oY
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
(I never had that many mead bottles in whiterun.. damn)
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/miracle-of-sound/5350-Nord-Mead-Skyrim
To the brotherhood! *hic*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yep, they did not create it.
In my spare time, I enjoy modding Fallout 3 and potentially I will do some modding for Skyrim too eventually.
But this makes us modders nervous. If I come out with some really good content, will they seek to trademark it out from under me? Even though I likely wouldn't make a dime, and never plan to - I would quit modding right away if they did that.
While I wouldn't be annoyed about any 'profit loss' - it suddenly puts me in a position legally, that I wouldn't want to be in.
Hmm, maybe I should find something else to do, huh?
But if not for us Modders - Oblivion, Fallout, and Skyrim's re-playability would be *significantly* lesser.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aawwww poor babies!
What's next they want to trademark Dragons too? or the use of "Nordich" themes in a game/movie/novel/whatever?
Though the memes for Skyrim cannot be stopped by some idiot country in one country trying to control what is a WORLDWIDE phenomenon that they just provided the original idea for.
Or are they also trying to tm the idea for "Force Balance Push" (What the words mean in the Dragon tongue of the game)
Maybe someone should create a meme that says "Zenimax - Fools R Dumb"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Skyrim
OK, I know this is not on topic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
There's your problem.. The water from the steam is making your fandanged electonical equipement emit sparks.
You need more coal!
(Ok.. hiding now)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's CLEARLY the reason. That's CLEARLY their intentions.
You guys are retarded.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
You know what's really really funny about that line of reasoning? There are over 200 Dragon commands in the game and this is the only one they are filing a trademark for. The only reason they are doing this is to control its use as a meme. Seriously, check out the 6 filings. Half of them are for merchandising. If that is not a mad dash to cash in on a meme, then nothing is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Probably not.
Let me explain my reasoning:
1) Fus Ro Da is in the Dragon Language which was created by ZeniMax.
2) Fus Ro Da is probably the only shout from which you remember in the game.
3) If you go up to someone and say "Feim Zii Gron," even if they're a gamer, they probably will have no idea what you are referencing unless they are REALLY into Skyrim. But suddenly you say "Fus Ro Dah!" and it is IMMEDIATELY understood as a reference to Skyrim.
About Scrolls:
I do not agree on ZeniMax with suing Mojang over this. I think it's pretty ridiculous myself. But the difference is that if Mojang WERE making a game called "Fus Ro Dah Dragons!" or anything with "Sky" or "Rim" together in it, it's clearly trademark infringement.
This is where fair use comes into play.
Fair Use, as described by Wikipedia includes, but not necessarily limited to: "commentary, criticism, news reporting, research, teaching, library archiving and scholarship."
1) Fus Ro Dah used is a part of either criticism, or if you don't agree with that, you can say easily see the parody aspect of it. Wikipedia also reporting: "it can be protected from claims by the copyright owner of the original work under the fair use doctrine."
2) Let's be honest. Who the f*** would you sue for an internet meme? The CheezBurger networks? Yeah right. They have enough money so that they can afford that lawsuit. 4chan? 4chan has CP on it half of the time, so they can deal with THAT problem first, and then claim DMCA protections.
3) None of these things are being used for profit. Nobody is trying to sell Skyrim illegally and saying it's completely legal. If they are, they're retarded too. If I came out with a shirt that said "Fus Ro Dah!", then ZeniMax has a COMPLETELY reasonable reason to sue me! I am USING THEIR WORK THAT THEY CREATED WITHOUT THEIR PERMISSION. That is COPYRIGHT or TRADEMARK infringement.
What you freaks are calling for is the total abolishment of copyright and trademark in general, when actually it IS used to support the Industry. Is the law abused? Of COURSE it is. I would never argue that, because that is DEFINITELY clear to all parties of every side and opinion.
This website is a disgrace to reporting news because:
1) Extremely biased. TechDirt is like the Fox News of web blogs. I think that goes without saying.
2) Too in-depth reasoning. Mike could say that Apple is a terrible company because they filed a copyright for a new logo, and then claim that this is a CLEAR attack on the public domain because god forbid Apple have rights over their logo, and Apple, being associated with computer products.
3) It twists the facts. While there MAY be more general music being produced, most of this music is NOT created for professional use. Most professional musicians out there aren't doing too well. At all. I know, because I AM a musician and I know how it feels to be broke for that past 3 years. While music sales may have increased, you'll notice they'ved only increased for the top artists out there. By "Top" I mean a broad range of musician in every field. Read into it as you will, it means the same thing.
Another thing.
ZeniMax, from the understanding of this article, hasn't sued anyone, hasn't taken down any websites, hasn't stopped the sales of any goods, or any legal action at all so far. They've simply filed a Trademark. God forbid someone file a Trademark? When they start making actions, THAT'S when a story like this needs to be reported. It is not only speculative, it is paranoia and stupidity that reports a story that is almost as bad as spying on someone. "They looked up information on the AK-47 and Nitroglycerin! THEY MUST BE A TERRORIST!" is that kind of reasoning.
You guys are ridiculous fanatics chasing a lost goal that doesn't even make sense. Half of you support the Pirate Party platform because you want to pirate music and movies. That's REALLY what this whole argument is about. People want permission to do whatever they want and not get caught. Unfortunately, that's not possible. Don't pretend it's not true, because I was like you once, and came to my senses. Come to your minds, people. You're pathetic.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I don't play Skyrim, so no, I don't understand it.
>What you freaks are calling for is the total abolishment of copyright and trademark in general, when actually it IS used to support the Industry. Is the law abused? Of COURSE it is. I would never argue that, because that is DEFINITELY clear to all parties of every side and opinion.
The article has claimed that ZeniMax's intentions are unclear, and mentions that trademark HAS been abused to silence stuff that would be considered fair use. Where are the claims for abolishing trademark law?
>This website is a disgrace to reporting news because:
You agree that the law has been abused, then insult the site? Convincing.
>1) Extremely biased. TechDirt is like the Fox News of web blogs. I think that goes without saying.
And the MPAA's blog, which has insulted TechDirt and Ars Technica for pointing out their failures, is the epitome of honesty, truth and objectivity.
>2) Too in-depth reasoning. Mike could say that Apple is a terrible company because they filed a copyright for a new logo, and then claim that this is a CLEAR attack on the public domain because god forbid Apple have rights over their logo, and Apple, being associated with computer products.
So we should make passing remarks with less reasoning, then?
>3) It twists the facts. While there MAY be more general music being produced, most of this music is NOT created for professional use. Most professional musicians out there aren't doing too well. At all. I know, because I AM a musician and I know how it feels to be broke for that past 3 years. While music sales may have increased, you'll notice they'ved only increased for the top artists out there. By "Top" I mean a broad range of musician in every field. Read into it as you will, it means the same thing.
The general point is that more music is produced. Whether you make money from it or not is, frankly, none of anyone's concern. It's not something we would wish upon anyone, but the statement that more music is being made is only a response to the RIAA that piracy is preventing music from being made, by their metrics. It's not. You've acknowledged this much.
>They've simply filed a Trademark.
And the article has pointed it out. However, should ZeniMax choose to antagonise anyone over this there WILL be consequences. Who's threatening ZeniMax from filing the trademark?
>You guys are ridiculous fanatics chasing a lost goal that doesn't even make sense. Half of you support the Pirate Party platform because you want to pirate music and movies.
Right, so you think that fair use is a bad idea, and that suing everyone for your meal ticket is sensible.
>Don't pretend it's not true, because I was like you once, and came to my senses. Come to your minds, people. You're pathetic.
So you came to your senses to fail at reading comprehension and insult people? Yeah, good luck with that sort of argumentation skill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
So why are you commenting on something you don't even understand?
>The article has claimed that ZeniMax's intentions are unclear, and mentions that trademark HAS been abused to silence stuff that would be considered fair use. Where are the claims for abolishing trademark law?
Several places on this site, it mentions a possibility and an ideal world without it.
>You agree that the law has been abused, then insult the site? Convincing.
Yes. I think everyone can agree that and also say this site twists the facts and tries to show everything through a paranoid light.
>And the MPAA's blog, which has insulted TechDirt and Ars Technica for pointing out their failures, is the epitome of honesty, truth and objectivity.
I don't have a problem pointing out the faults of both Ars Technica, Techdirt, and MPAA in the same sentence.
>So we should make passing remarks with less reasoning, then?
We should read into simple things like this. Saying someone is going to murder everyone just because we bought a gun is too in-depth reasoning. I have the absolute right to own a gun in my area, because if a criminal broke in, I would have the right to self-defense. A Patent, Copyright, or Trademark is the same thing.
>The general point is that more music is produced. Whether you make money from it or not is, frankly, none of anyone's concern. It's not something we would wish upon anyone, but the statement that more music is being made is only a response to the RIAA that piracy is preventing music from being made, by their metrics. It's not. You've acknowledged this much.
The RIAA takes an extreme stance on piracy and economics, I agree. But the RIAA supports professional musicians. And the easiest way to define a professional musician, whether you like or not, is to see who is on subsidiary labels. That's just a fact. And those are the musicians they obtain data from, and that's why their facts are different than ours. Frankly, those facts mean more to me, because I feel that when 10,000 new artist each produced a CD that sold only 100 copies raises $1,000,000 for the Industry, it really doesn't help anyone because none of them are making enough money to actually make a living off of it.
>And the article has pointed it out. However, should ZeniMax choose to antagonise anyone over this there WILL be consequences. Who's threatening ZeniMax from filing the trademark?
Nobody is threatening ZeniMax about anything. And something ZeniMax isn't threatening anything either. They are just filing a Trademark to protect their intellectual property in which they have complete fair rights over because they created it. I don't see what the problem is. Techdirt is already assuming that because you filed a Trademark that you're going to sue someone. That's not always the case.
>Right, so you think that fair use is a bad idea, and that suing everyone for your meal ticket is sensible.
Uhhh... I'm pretty sure I pointed out my views on Fair Use. Should ZeniMax choose to sue or send out a DMCA takedown notice to every site that spread the meme, I think I would clealy not support that.
>So you came to your senses to fail at reading comprehension and insult people? Yeah, good luck with that sort of argumentation skill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The same can be said of a lot of people who visit this site. By your statement none of us are lawyers so we have no grounds in criticising the application of law. My point being that your point of the universal, immediate association of the phrase to the game is not proven as not everyone plays the game.
>Several places on this site, it mentions a possibility and an ideal world without it.
If you want to criticise that then respond in those articles when the topic is actually brought up.
>Yes. I think everyone can agree that and also say this site twists the facts and tries to show everything through a paranoid light.
So go on, then. Debunk what's been shown on the site. If the facts have been twisted surely you can show how they've been twisted.
>I don't have a problem pointing out the faults of both Ars Technica, Techdirt, and MPAA in the same sentence.
So you'd rather take the MPAA's word over Techdirt, then. Comforting.
>But the RIAA supports professional musicians. And the easiest way to define a professional musician, whether you like or not, is to see who is on subsidiary labels. That's just a fact.
Wow, really? You'd rather pay attention to organisations that have been known to rip the artist off in their accounting? What about cases where artists have to sue their big-name labels; that's supposed to be better than more music being made?
>Techdirt is already assuming that because you filed a Trademark that you're going to sue someone. That's not always the case.
You're refusing to see the point. The article has stated that if ZeniMax chooses to go this route there will be consequences. The article has NOT stated that ZeniMax MUST be filing for trademark for the sole purpose of going after the meme. You're the one who's assuming and twisting facts to villainise the site for allegedly villainising ZeniMax.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
> The same can be said of a lot of people who visit this site. By your statement none of us are lawyers so we have no grounds in criticizing the application of law. My point being that your point of the universal, immediate association of the phrase to the game is not proven as not everyone plays the game.
No. You're right, none of us are lawyers, unless any of us are. Really, none of us should try to put in our "professional opinion" to something in which we don't completely understand. In which, Mike should also not be even making comments about the application of the law. MY point is that, no, you don't even understand what the trademark is from and the relevance of it to ONLY the game. Also, let me show you the applications of the trademark use:
1) Computer game software for use with computers and video game consoles; downloadable computer game software offered via the internet and wireless devices; cell phone cases; downloadable cell phone ringtones; digital tablet cases; smart phone cases; mouse pads; eyeglass cases; head phones.
I.e.: Only Bethesda can make use of the phrase in a game or other software in the software's content, in a ringtone, smart phone cases, eyeglass case, head phones, or cell phone case. In other words: We created it, so if it's going to be used for profit, we're going to be notified and we're going to earn something for it.
2) Computer and video game user instruction manuals; magazines, books, and pamphlets concerning video games; computer and video game strategy guide books and magazines; trading cards, maps, posters, advertisement boards of paper or cardboard, art prints if it's outside the jurisdiction of fair use.
I.e.: Only we can use it in guide books and strategy games. Unless we give permission, you have no right to using it in a printed product such as a magazine, trading card, map, posters, advertisement, or art print. In other words: If you print something with this phrase on it, we have are completely reasonable in that we can sue you if it's outside the jurisdiction of fair use.
3) Bags, namely, backpacks, duffel bags, knapsacks, book bags, athletic bags, and cosmetic bags, sold empty.
Any bag "sold empty" (filled bags don't apply? Kinda confused here as well)
I.e.: You make something with a trademark of ours on it outside of fair use, than we can sue you. Again, completely reasonable.
4) Clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, fleece pullovers; headwear, namely, hats
I.e.: Exact same thing as above.
5) Toys and action figures; playing cards, dice, and board games; bobble-head dolls; sporting equipment.
Same thing. AGAIN.
6) Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line interactive computer games and providing information relating to electronic computer games via the internet.
This one is important. Why? Because, as you should be notified of, ZeniMax is in the production of an MMO associated with The Elder Scrolls, which might be used in online entertainment. Likewise, if they have a service that is used in their gaming or such with "Fus Ro Da" included in it, they have an absolute right to sue, because, HEY! It's their product, it's associated ONLY with them and nowhere else (please, entertain me and find me a place where it's NOT associated with Skyrim or a Dragon Shout or a force shove, and I might give in a LITTLE).
> If you want to criticise that then respond in those articles when the topic is actually brought up.
I do.
An article right now which is twisting the facts is this one. ZeniMax, in fact, did NOT trademark a meme. The meme existed after the fact, therefore technically belongs to the trademark registrar if they registered it. Second, the "meme" isn't even thought of as a meme. When I think of "Fus Ro Da" I think of Skyrim, and the force push dragon shout. Not of the internet meme. Third, the above patents don't apply to the internet meme. We can argue over this, but seeing as we're both not lawyers, it won't get anywhere. Regardless, I shall show my view on it:
Unless you can prove that a meme is regarded as an "entertainment service," "computer game software," "computer and video game instruction manual," "clothing," or "toy/action figure," than you have no applicable patent to the picture of something that says "Fus Ro Da" that is spread on the internet (via fair use, for one, and second, that the patent doesn't apply).
> So go on, then. Debunk what's been shown on the site. If the facts have been twisted surely you can show how they've been twisted.
> So you'd rather take the MPAA's word over Techdirt, then. Comforting.
Who's word I take is none of your business and really has nothing to do with discussion.
> Wow, really? You'd rather pay attention to organisations that have been known to rip the artist off in their accounting? What about cases where artists have to sue their big-name labels; that's supposed to be better than more music being made?
While I agree with you, I really don't see how it's relevant to the discussion.
> You're refusing to see the point. The article has stated that if ZeniMax chooses to go this route there will be consequences. The article has NOT stated that ZeniMax MUST be filing for trademark for the sole purpose of going after the meme. You're the one who's assuming and twisting facts to villainise the site for allegedly villainising ZeniMax.
This article is villainising ZeniMax for filing a trademark that is completely reasonable. That, my friend, is bad news reporting. At least try to make it a little straightforward. Mike doesn't even understand the meme's origins, or the use of it in the game properly, it sounds. If he does, he's SERIOUSLY trying to villainise ANYONE filing a trademark.
Second, ZeniMax MUST have a reason to trademark the phrase "Fus Ro Da!" because they probably want to make some money off of it. Namely action figures, t-shirts, and use of it in other software. Again, this is all they have jurisdiction over with their trademark. I fail to see how this is unreasonable. If it is, then you have a serious misunderstanding of intellectual property, the law, and capitalism. And capitalism, my friend, is the law, whether you agree with it or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
> The same can be said of a lot of people who visit this site. By your statement none of us are lawyers so we have no grounds in criticizing the application of law. My point being that your point of the universal, immediate association of the phrase to the game is not proven as not everyone plays the game.
No. You're right, none of us are lawyers, unless any of us are. Really, none of us should try to put in our "professional opinion" to something in which we don't completely understand. In which, Mike should also not be even making comments about the application of the law. MY point is that, no, you don't even understand what the trademark is from and the relevance of it to ONLY the game. Also, let me show you the applications of the trademark use:
1) Computer game software for use with computers and video game consoles; downloadable computer game software offered via the internet and wireless devices; cell phone cases; downloadable cell phone ringtones; digital tablet cases; smart phone cases; mouse pads; eyeglass cases; head phones.
I.e.: Only Bethesda can make use of the phrase in a game or other software in the software's content, in a ringtone, smart phone cases, eyeglass case, head phones, or cell phone case. In other words: We created it, so if it's going to be used for profit, we're going to be notified and we're going to earn something for it.
2) Computer and video game user instruction manuals; magazines, books, and pamphlets concerning video games; computer and video game strategy guide books and magazines; trading cards, maps, posters, advertisement boards of paper or cardboard, art prints if it's outside the jurisdiction of fair use.
I.e.: Only we can use it in guide books and strategy games. Unless we give permission, you have no right to using it in a printed product such as a magazine, trading card, map, posters, advertisement, or art print. In other words: If you print something with this phrase on it, we have are completely reasonable in that we can sue you if it's outside the jurisdiction of fair use.
3) Bags, namely, backpacks, duffel bags, knapsacks, book bags, athletic bags, and cosmetic bags, sold empty.
Any bag "sold empty" (filled bags don't apply? Kinda confused here as well)
I.e.: You make something with a trademark of ours on it outside of fair use, than we can sue you. Again, completely reasonable.
4) Clothing, namely, T-shirts, shirts, sweatshirts, fleece pullovers; headwear, namely, hats
I.e.: Exact same thing as above.
5) Toys and action figures; playing cards, dice, and board games; bobble-head dolls; sporting equipment.
Same thing. AGAIN.
6) Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line interactive computer games and providing information relating to electronic computer games via the internet.
This one is important. Why? Because, as you should be notified of, ZeniMax is in the production of an MMO associated with The Elder Scrolls, which might be used in online entertainment. Likewise, if they have a service that is used in their gaming or such with "Fus Ro Da" included in it, they have an absolute right to sue, because, HEY! It's their product, it's associated ONLY with them and nowhere else (please, entertain me and find me a place where it's NOT associated with Skyrim or a Dragon Shout or a force shove, and I might give in a LITTLE).
> If you want to criticise that then respond in those articles when the topic is actually brought up.
I do.
An article right now which is twisting the facts is this one. ZeniMax, in fact, did NOT trademark a meme. The meme existed after the fact, therefore technically belongs to the trademark registrar if they registered it. Second, the "meme" isn't even thought of as a meme. When I think of "Fus Ro Da" I think of Skyrim, and the force push dragon shout. Not of the internet meme. Third, the above patents don't apply to the internet meme. We can argue over this, but seeing as we're both not lawyers, it won't get anywhere. Regardless, I shall show my view on it:
Unless you can prove that a meme is regarded as an "entertainment service," "computer game software," "computer and video game instruction manual," "clothing," or "toy/action figure," than you have no applicable patent to the picture of something that says "Fus Ro Da" that is spread on the internet (via fair use, for one, and second, that the patent doesn't apply).
> So go on, then. Debunk what's been shown on the site. If the facts have been twisted surely you can show how they've been twisted.
> So you'd rather take the MPAA's word over Techdirt, then. Comforting.
Who's word I take is none of your business and really has nothing to do with discussion.
> Wow, really? You'd rather pay attention to organisations that have been known to rip the artist off in their accounting? What about cases where artists have to sue their big-name labels; that's supposed to be better than more music being made?
While I agree with you, I really don't see how it's relevant to the discussion.
> You're refusing to see the point. The article has stated that if ZeniMax chooses to go this route there will be consequences. The article has NOT stated that ZeniMax MUST be filing for trademark for the sole purpose of going after the meme. You're the one who's assuming and twisting facts to villainise the site for allegedly villainising ZeniMax.
This article is villainising ZeniMax for filing a trademark that is completely reasonable. That, my friend, is bad news reporting. At least try to make it a little straightforward. Mike doesn't even understand the meme's origins, or the use of it in the game properly, it sounds. If he does, he's SERIOUSLY trying to villainise ANYONE filing a trademark.
Second, ZeniMax MUST have a reason to trademark the phrase "Fus Ro Da!" because they probably want to make some money off of it. Namely action figures, t-shirts, and use of it in other software. Again, this is all they have jurisdiction over with their trademark. I fail to see how this is unreasonable. If it is, then you have a serious misunderstanding of intellectual property, the law, and capitalism. And capitalism, my friend, is the law, whether you agree with it or not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
nice try
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
http://www.etsy.com/search/handmade?search_submit=&q=skyrim&view_type=gallery& ;ship_to=US
If they were smart, they'd create a marketplace on their own site for handmade Skyrim goods, and take a 1% cut on all goods sold. They'd make a tiny profit, but FREE ADVERTISING!!
Game companies need to realize, just like music and movie companies, that fans mashing, mixing, and reworking your IP, is what keeps your product alive in the minds of fans. You release it, they build upon it, and it keeps the train rolling until your next release.
There is a whole culture around Skyrim, and it's fun browsing through http://reddit.com/r/skyrim looking at all the stuff people come up with because they love the game. None of this hurts the game, it only makes it better.
(Skyrim player, 109 hours playing, just started main quest a day ago)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.338825-Skyrim-mod-turns-dragon-into-giant-fire -breathing-Fluttershy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AWWWWW YEAAAAAAA I'm right here Zenimax come and get it.
It's how I'm going to start greeting everyone instead of a simple hello. I think I'm going to quit my job to go work at Wal-Mart as a greeter.
Hello welcome to Fus Ro Dah!
Can you imagine the epicness of yelling Fus Ro Dah! all day!
Hey Zenimax guess what? Fus Ro Dah!
PS if you're thinking of taking me to court don't try I will Fus Ro Dah you in the mouth with a rusty Fus Ro Dah till you're begging for a C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
As for "cashing in on the meme", isn't that what every one else is doing, on something that isn't theirs to begin with?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
If they had truly valued this as a brand they could monetize, they would have done so 4 months ago when it was created. Not today after it has already been established in the marketplace by people who recognized its value four months ago.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I mean come on, shouting people across the room/off mountains/into traps... that never gets old.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sexy Skyrim
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
{Skyrim Dragon Shouts}
[ link to this | view in chronology ]