SGI Back From The Dead (Again) And Suing Tons Of Companies For Patent Infringement

from the troll-troll-troll-troll dept

Back when I moved to Silicon Valley, Silicon Graphics Inc., (SGI) was still a hot place to work. They were still pumping out cool machines and had a reputation for a fun corporate culture. Of course, that collapsed pretty quickly over the next few years, as SGI totally misjudged the market trends and fell victim to the innovator's dilemma. Basically, SGI never could come to terms with the fact that its premium products were going to be increasingly undercut as cheaper commodity technology improved. Back in 2006, we noted that what remained of SGI had indicated that it planned to resurrect the company by going patent troll. However, we thought we'd avoided that ignoble result when SGI sold most of its assets to Rackable for a mere $25 million three years ago. Silly us for assuming those patents would just go away.

While Rackable changed its name to Silicon Graphics International... the original company actually retained the patents, and renamed itself Graphics Properties Holdings... and over the last few years has been suing lots of companies for patent infringement. In the last year alone it has sued Apple, HTC, LG, RIM, Samsung, Sony, Acer, ASUS, Panasonic, Sharp, Toshiba, Vizio and Motorola Mobility.

As the link above notes, while some of GPH's patents are relatively early, it appears that lots of similar inventions predated key patents. However, the early date may make those patents look stronger, and give GPH much more leverage in getting companies to pay up -- or risk losing the ability to produce devices with nice graphics capabilities.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: patent troll, silicon valley
Companies: acer, apple, asus, htc, lg, motorola mobility, panasonic, rim, samsung, sgi, sharp, sony, toshiba, vizio


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Pixelation, 8 May 2012 @ 11:21pm

    Dear Representatives,

    Our current IP legislation is a JOKE. Why, you ask? Let's start with patent lawsuits. We don't need that sort of broken thinking. We can compete with anyone without your screwed up intervention. Please clean up your mess and get out of the way.

    Thank you,

    A Hard Working American

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 May 2012 @ 11:24pm

    Does anybody else remember when American companies actually made something besides lawsuits and advertising right here in America?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Keii (profile), 9 May 2012 @ 7:17am

      Re:

      Wait... wait... I think you might have inspired me to make something...
      Yes! I've got it! Advertising rights to lawsuits! Brilliant!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Baldaur Regis (profile), 9 May 2012 @ 8:07am

      Re:

      Some bean-counter at one of these NPEs will eventually figure out that lawyers are cheaper in (say) Burma. And another proud American industry will be outsourced.

      On the bright side, surplus US lawyers make excellent artificial reefs when dumped offshore in sufficient quantities.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2012 @ 8:40am

      Re:

      Pepperidge Farm remembers

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Rapnel (profile), 9 May 2012 @ 12:08pm

      Re:

      Bullets! .. ? Lots and lots of bullets .. ? And we're all buying them - only we don't get to shoot them.. apparently. Wait.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Hoby (profile), 9 May 2012 @ 12:19am

    What a sad end to such a once-brilliant company.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 May 2012 @ 3:45am

    Those who can innovate.
    Those who can't litigate.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    abc gum, 9 May 2012 @ 4:47am

    Looks to be just another get rich quick scheme whose days are numbered. Reminds me of a nature show where the vultures are so busy fighting over the carcass they do not realize it is being consumed by other scavengers.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gregg Butler, 9 May 2012 @ 5:46am

    IP's, Patents and Trolls....

    I say that if a company makes a patent, then they have 5 years to use it or loose it. The rest of the world can't wait forever for them to use it. Especially with in the IT world. It's not like anyone else hasn't thought of it yet. Why should the whole world suffer and wait for a product sitting on the shelf protected by the law, when people can use them. And frankly, these law suites are clogging up the court rooms. Believe it or not, it hits our tax dollars in the end!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • icon
    Overcast (profile), 10 May 2012 @ 3:27pm

    More like a zombie than back from the dead - lumbering, brainless, with no ideas - they only seek to leech off of the living.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Austin, 14 May 2012 @ 11:49am

    Except the Kitchen Sink

    The really telling thing here is that a company that was founded on the production of Graphics Cards sued a bunch of system makers - but chose to omit both NVidia and ATI. Many will claim that SGI had/has a lot of innovation. What does it say that they cannot make a case worth filing against either of the 2 primary companies in their primary field? Seems like a pretty blatant lack of innovation to me.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.